DarkLordOfOptics
Politics • Science & Tech • Sports
Guns, Optics, 2nd Amendment and resisting the Left in everything they touch.
Interested? Want to learn more about the community?

Learn more first
Uncooled Thermal with a little bit of history

There is, as always, an entertaining discussion happening in the Hide, but I do not feel like getting into another protracted argument about comparative merits of different uncooled cores with people who do not know a whole lot about them. I mentioned that BAE is getting out of the uncooled core business. The responses were interesting.

Still, I thought some of the background on uncooled cores is worth rehashing since I was around for most of it and involved in some of it. Hopefully, you'll find it informative. If not, this post will fade like many others before it.

Here is a little history on uncooled cores from an eyewitness.

I was working at Raytheon when it was starting out and one of my first projects over there was trying to figure out how to calibrate early uncooled cores for a military project that eventually ended up going into ENVG.

The uncooled technology was first developed by Honeywell and after a while they licensed it to a bunch of people. Honeywell developed the technology, but did not do anything with it. Eventually, most of patent protections expired, but it is still a very specialized and expensive process to get into. Printing MEMS structures is not for the faint of heart and recooping the investment requires some serious volumes.

After some jockeying around between different companies and a few consolidations, an interesting situation developed with most of the market coalescing around several relatively large volume applications. Thermal riflescopes and clip-ons, in terms of volume, are roughly the size of a mosquito bite on the left testicle of an elephant, compared to what the manufacturers are looking for.

Originally, all uncooled cores still had thermoelectric coolers with the idea being that it is much easier to get this thing to work if the sensor temperature is stable. They were called uncooled because they were not cryogenically cooled to liquid nitrogen temperatures. There were still kinda cooled, but very mildly. Temperature stabilized was probably a better way of saying this. However, most of the volume applications cared about cost more than about image quality (within reason), so most manufacturers yanked the TECs out. BAE did it a bit later and when comparing BAE's temperature stabilized cores with everyone else's BAE had the advantage. Also, unlike almost everyone else, BAE was willing to sell imaging cores in low volumes, which is how Oasys and a bunch of other small players ended up using BAE cores. DRS could not be bothered. Raytheon was not set up for any of this stuff either, so they just signed a contract with Seek to deal with the non-military market and eventually ignored most of the uncooled world entirely. Ulis in France (which later merged with Sofradir, which later became Lynred), like BAE, was relatively easier to deal with for small companies, which is how we ended up with Pulsar making thermal scopes in Europe around Lynred cores. SCD makes them in Israel, but they aim at somewhat different stuff. There is some new stuff happening too in the US and Taiwan.

Ulis originally used amorphous silicon (aSi) for their uncooled detectors, while most of the US companies leaned toward Vanadium Oxid (VOX). aSI had better uniformity, while VOX had better sensitivity. The whole uncooled imaging business was such a radical departure from all other types of imaging technology that it took a serious learning curve to get it worked out. The military paid for that learning curve and provided some volumes to make the whole worthwhile. Then, other applications started coming up in the civilian world. None of them were particularly large in volume until the prices dropped enough for the automotive market to get interested, but that's a story for another day.

FLIR was an odd duck in that they liked civilian market, but did not want to do anything with gunstuff, until the first Armasight went and built a business using FLIR cores.

As an aside, technically, the whole FLIR uncooled business started as a different company called Indigo (it was across the street from Raytheon Vision Systems in Goleta where I worked). They were working on the whole uncooled thing in parallel with us and were acquired by FLIR. That's how FLIR ended up in the uncooled business.

What is even funnier is that a lot of the infrared camera stuff started in Santa Barbara because of Hughes Aircraft and Bill Parish. Back in the 1950s, Hughes Aircraft pissed off one of their more entrepreneurial employees, who left and started Santa Barbara Research Center with other former Hughes employees. SBRC bounced around for a little while, but ended up being acquired by Hughes Aircraft in the 1970s (I think). They were happily making missiles of all sorts. Missiles needed sensors. The bulk of the early technical stuff on the subject was done in Santa Barbara by three entities: SBRC (Santa Barbara Research Center), SBRS (Santa Barbara Remote Sensing) and later SBFP (Santa Barbara Focal Plane). The origin of Infrared imaging goes back to these three. SBRC was doing weapons related things. SBRS was more about space. Both of these were acquired by Hughes Aircraft, which was alter acquired by Raytheon. I briefly worked at SBRC that was eventually renamed Raytheon Vision. Systems. SBFP started a little later and was eventually acquired by Lockheed.
Goleta, just north of Santa Barbara, was the northern side of what we humorously called the "Infrared Valley". The southern side was Rockwell Science Center (RSC) in Thousand Oaks. I worked at RSC before Raytheon. A bit after I left, RSC was purchased by Teledyne. FLIR was also purchased by Teledyne, but much more recently. Infrared imaging cores, cooled and uncooled, are a big deal, so larger aerospace companies have bee buying smaller companies who develop these things.
To get these kinds of companies going, you need people with relevant expertise, which is where the whole Infrared Valley comes in. Small companies pop up in the same general area with good regularity because they can draw on a pool of people from large existing companies. Then, the get purchased by a larger company. After some lockout time, the founders go off and start something else. The latest such thing happened last week when Safran purchased Atollo Engineering. The two guys behind Atollo had a company before hand int he same general area that they sold to FLIR. The turned around, started Atollo and now sold that too. I know one of them relatively well and he is a very capable guy.
Still, they are all sorta following in the footsteps of Dr Bill Parish. He started a company called Amber Engineering to make infrared imaging marginally affordable (by government efforts) and his company was bought by Raytheon. After hanging around for a little while, he started another company called Indigo, that focused on uncooled imaging. That one was purchased by FLIR. He hung around for a little bit and then started Seek Thermal, which licensed the whole uncooled thing from Raytheon. He is still around, but not longer young. I did not know him well, but we crossed paths a few times. Brilliant guy.

Going back tot he original story... the guys who started Armasight were originally at ATN, but broke off and decided to do their own thing. They were sufficiently successful for FLIR to notice and decide that they want to play. FLIR bought Armasight and relatively quickly got in trouble over some export issues. The details are not germane to this story, but FLIR paid a very large fine and canned the whole "thermal scopes for civilians thing". The did have quite a lot of inventory on hand though which did eventually end up in the market by very odd means.

The important part here is that none of the large thermal core manufacturers ever gave a rat's behind about civilian weapon sight applications (not enough volume and not enough margin) unless someone else did the hard work in the beginning.

The high volume applications, kept pushing the market toward cheaper thermal cores which required digital readouts, wafer level packaging and a variety of other niceties. None of those things helped image quality. Sometimes, image quality got worse. The price did go down by quite a lot.

BAE did not do any of that. They kept making the same cores with analog readouts and occasional changes in pixel pitch. They got the image quality up to a very high standard, but could not compete on price in large volume applications. All of their competitors who invested into newer technologies eventually got the image quality back up without getting the price back up.

Newer military programs kept on going to DRS. Civilian market alone is not enough to keep making thermal cores. BAE announced that they will be getting out of this business. For a little while the government tried to keep BAE uncooled in business by splitting programs, but it looks like BAE decided they can't make money in this business any more.

In parallel, the Chinese government got the manufacturing of uncooled cores up and running. It started with a couple of entities. One copied FLIR architecture and kept on tweaking it. The other copied ULIS/Sofradir/Lynred and kept on tweaking it. Initially, I think the French went and helped them set it up (for a lot of money). China was trying to compete militarily with the US, which means you need pretty high performing infrared imagers for missile seekers (or missile guidance systems if you prefer that terminology). US slapped all of this stuff with export controls, which made other companies developed homegrown manufacturers. Cryogenically cooled infrared was beyond Chinese capabilities, but uncooled infrared technology could be bought or stolen more easily. CCP invested heavily in it. They got a couple of huge facilities running. When you mass produce these things, there is statistical variation in performance. Only 2-3% of what they made in China was good enough for missile seekers. The rest, rather than being discarded, was offered to the civilian market.
That's how we ended up with inexpensive uncooled thermal. Modern chinese cores have rather good image quality at a decent price. FLIR, Dalsa, Seek, DRS got their prices down into something reasonable too. BAE has good image quality, but did not invest into their cost structure. That's why they are getting out of the uncooled business.

PS. It is late and I am shooting a match tomorrow. I apologize for the speling and grammar errors. I'll proofread it all tomorrow when I get home.

Interested? Want to learn more about the community?

Learn more first
What else you may like…
Videos
Posts
Articles
Primary Arms PLx Compact High Power Scopes: First Look

It was a busy weekend, or at least that is my excuse.
I did finally make it out to the range for a quick side-by-side with the new PLxC scopes and some initial impressions.
Generally speaking, I have been quite impressed with how PA has been moving forward with their decidedly upmarket PLxC scopes.
It is now a very complete product line with 1-8x24 LPVO, 1.5-12x36 MPVO, 2.5-20x48 Crossover and 4.5-36x56 Precision scopes.

The latter two are the subject of this First Look video.

Equally importantly, Primary Arms is listening to market feedback and DEKA G2 reticle that is in both of the scopes I have is a perfectly modern precision reticle

https://alnk.to/et1cgmd

00:13:09
Are bipods obsolete? Strong Hand by Dialed Designs

Bipods are not obsolete, but I kinda have to admit that ever since tripods and gamechanger shooting bags came about, I have been using bipods increasingly less.
I did use my triple pull in its fully extended configuration during last match on one stage (you had to use a shaky stick as a support, so I used it as a rear support kneeling) and actually hit a target 500-ish yards away, but in retrospect, I could have used the tripod instead just as well.
Since I spent most of this year unable to shoot prone without pain, I shot off of the tripod as much as possible. I got a lot better at that, but it is still a single point of support. How well I can shoot with the rifle clipped into the tripod (or off a bag sitting on top of a tripod table) seems to have a pretty strong dependence on the weight of the rifle. It is markedly easier with a 16lbs rifle than with a 12lbs one. It is a LOT easier with a 20lbs gun (assuming all three are shooting the same 6.5CM cartridge). I did connect on a plate 1446yards ...

00:02:34
Vortex Veil 400 Thermal Monocular

After a lengthier silence than I anticipated, here is the first of several reviews on thermal optics that I plan to release.

While my normal predilection is to decidedly lean toward the very high end of what's available, with this one I decided to look at something relatively affordable. I was shocked how much I liked it.

It has respectable image quality overall, very convenient form factor and the best thought out controls I have seen on any thermal monocular to date.

Most places have it for around $1500. Opticsplanet has it listed at $1269, but out of stock. https://alnk.to/hszMNe8

Midway has it in stock and their 1776VTX26 coupon code seems to work on the Veil400 for now. That brings the price down to $1234 https://alnk.to/faFW2Ff
That's likely the best deal going right now.

Veil400 comes with a decent carry case, but I have to admit it spent most of its time with me either in my cargo pocket or clipped to the binocular harness.

Veil400, despite being an inexpensive by ...

00:19:27
25 years

Today is the 25th anniversary of 9/11.

It seems like it was just yesterday, but about 30% of current population of the Untied States was born during these 25 years.

To them, 9/11 is ancient and frequently unimportant history.

Our education system has no interest in teaching our kids history, recent or otherwise.

It falls on us to make sure we remember and that our kids understand.

Here is a short piece I wrote on the subject for my Substack:
https://darklordofoptics.substack.com/p/25?r=y4q3j&utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=web&showWelcomeOnShare=true

On a separate note, tonight is the start of the Jewish New Year, the holiday or Rosh HaShanah that kicks of the High Holy days.

Shana Tovah, Y'all!

For a couple of thousand years, Jews all over the world, as they celebrate the New Year and the High Holy Days culminating in Yom Kippur, the Day of Atonement, would tell each other L’shanah haba’ah b’Yerushalayim which literally means "next year in Jerusalem"

Funnily enough, this year, I ...

Continuing with Labor Day: Tract Optics

Labor Day weekend is already half way over and I just now noticed that Tract has $100 off on their products as their Call To Fall promotion.

The discount code is TORIC100, so I assume it is on Toric product line.

Tract is another company that does not do sales and promotion a whole lot, so it is worthwhile if you are looking for something.

I generally like their product line quite a bit.

The two products that I have the most mileage with are their Toric LRF 10x42 binocular https://tractoptics.com/toric-10x42-eagle-ballistics-laser-rangefinding-binocular/?ref=ILYAKOSHKIN that we discussed rather extensively during the last livestream and the 2.5-15x44 riflescope with Eagleman reticle https://tractoptics.com/toric-uhd-30mm-2-5-15x44-ffp-illuminated-mrad-eagleman-long-range-hunting-rifle-scope/?ref=ILYAKOSHKIN

Their cooperation with James Eagleman seems to be increasingly more fruitful. I like the reticle he made for them and I like what they did in the LRF bino collaboration.

In terms of ...

post photo preview
Labor Day Sale: Telson Optics

This Labor Day, I decided to utilize a different strategy and rather than stuff all of the different holiday sales and discounts I find into one long email, to do multiple shorter ones on the premise that they are going to be more searchable. That does, however, pollute your mailbox a bit more, so let me know if this annoys you. I can go back to the original approach next time.

I talk about Telson Optics quite a lot. A big part of that is that I helped them with several reticle designs and I like the people behind the company. That makes me not entirely unbiased since the reticles, to a good degree, were designed to be something I like. On the other hand, the people who have bought these scopes per my recommendation have been pretty happy, so Telson is doing something right.

For Labor Day this year they have 10% off and it is stackable with my DLO15 discount code, so something like Telson Toxin 3-18x50 ends costing you $1285. That's a good price.
...

Spartan's CP Brace: Initial Impressions
In pursuit of stability

It has been a little time since I talked about Spartan Precision bipods and tripods.  That is largely due to my preoccupation with precision shooting during the last year and a half or so. 

I have two pieces of gear from Spartan: Ascent tripod https://alnk.to/28VEg3S and Javelin bipod https://alnk.to/gVPiEBd Both are very well made and rather quick to deploy, but they are not quite stable enough for the competition oriented endeavors I have been focusing on.  

For competition, it has been predominantly large diameter inverted leg tripods, like Zeiss' Max Duty kit and Triple Pull Ckyepod.  Inverted leg tripods are measurably faster to deploy and adjust when on the clock.  Triple Pull Ckyepod gives me the flexibility to shoot prone, sitting or kneeling in a pinch.

For hunting, however, I have been using the Spartan gear I listed above because it is light, easy to pack, fast to deploy and exceedingly well made.  It also really helps that the legs of the Ascent tripod come off for easier packing and for use as hiking sticks (that is highly useful when packing meat out and I like the idea of not needing to carry around separate walking sticks.

Most of my hunting rifles that I am not willing to attach a bipod to on a mostly permanent basis are set up for Spartan's Magnaswitch adapter.   It is slick, unobtrusive and can be used to snap either a bipod or tripod in.  It is not quite as stable at distance as a proper large diameter match tripod, but it is very fast to deploy and stable enough for my hunting purposes.

In the last few years, tripods have become an indespensible tool precision shooting when terrain is not conducive to shooting prone.  We use tripods for observation and target ID with binoculars and then immediately switch to using them for shooting support.  That is where things start to diverge a bit.

Some people clip the rifle into the Arca head of the tripod (that's what I have been doing lately).

Some keep a tripod table clipped in and do both glassing and shooting off of a bag sitting on top of the tripod table (that's what I started out with originally, but managing extra gear took too long.  I am more efficient now, so it might be time to re-visit this).

Some of the top competitors use two tripods for front and rear support (that's more gear manipulation than I am comfortable with).

When there is a front support, whether a tall bipod or a prop of some sort or just a convenient terrain feature, tripods are routinely used as a rear support to stabilize the butstock of the rifle.  That is what's commonly referred to as "tripod rear".

I have been trying to keep things simple and mostly just shot with the rifle clipped into the tripod.  I got quite competent at it when shooting at the range, but it has been a bit of a struggle in the last two matches (I also had some health issue in parallel, but I suspect that it had more to do with me screwing things up under time pressure than health concerns).

Still, while I continue to practice shooting with the rifle clipped into the tripod, both standing and kneeling, it was time to expand my horizons and try to master various variants of "tripod rear" support.

That is when I stumbled onto Spartan's CP Brace that offers a completely different approach to using a tripod for two point rifle support.

 It is a very clever idea.  They are, essentially, creating a bridge betweeh two legs of the tripod that has a compact tripod head attached to it.  That is the front support.  The rear support is the tripod's third leg where, similarly to the conventional "tripod rear" setup, you use your support hand to anchor the buttstock of the rifle to the leg of the tripod.

Like everythign Spartan makes, CP Brace is not cheap, so I figured I should take one for the team, do some experimentation and let you know what I find.

Only for Supporters
To read the rest of this article and access other paid content, you must be a supporter
Read full Article
Will HICAR and 6.5CM+Peak kill the M7 and 6.8x51?
One part of my hopes that it will. On the other hand, I hope that it will not.


Either way, it is going to continue to be a mess.

Last month, powers that be issued a solicitation for the HICAR program:
https://sam.gov/workspace/contract/opp/b1a57529aa574e8ba220e0311434733e/view

HICAR stands for "Hypervelocity Improved Capability Assault Rifle"

The solicitation is specific to SOCOM, rather than the larger branches of the military.  However, I strongly suspect that it is a harbinger of smarter things to come than the general issue of anything chambered for the 6.8x51 (aka as 277 Fury in the civilian world).

Only for Supporters
To read the rest of this article and access other paid content, you must be a supporter
Read full Article
post photo preview
Visiting with TacomHQ

This week was my kids' spring break, so we ended up going on a road trip of sorts.  We flew to Houston, rented a car, visited the Space Center, checked out Galveston, then drove up to Dallas.  My dayjob is in Dallas and I need to visit the office occasionally.  Truthfully, I need to visit the office more often than I currently do, but given my family situation that is a little tricky.

My kids are very good travel companions, so we decided to drive back to Albuquerque instead of flying.  The way the timing worked out, we had a day to make a detour and drive up to Arkansas to visit John Baker and his Tacom HQ operation.

I've known John for a few years.  He has visited with me about three years ago to talk about his their reticle idea and a few other things  

I think the reticle idea is sound and we should see a version of it in a scope soon enough.  I'll do a thorough coverage at that point.

This time around, the reticle was not the main reason behind my visit.  John is a creative guy and they do several interesting things there.  Everything they do is clever and outside the box.  For example, to the best of my knowledge, they were the first to come up with different ways to shift the POI for ELR shooting with their TARAC devices.  Alpha and Bravo TARAC devices use prisms to shift the zero of the optic, but a predetermined angle.  I have a flip-up Alpha TARAC set up to help with my subsonic ELR pursuits.  Bravo TARAC attaches the prism to the objective of the riflescope which works beter with large objective designs.  Since Tacom came up with it, the idea has been pirated by a couple of people, most prominently by Nightforce.  Technically, Tacom has a patent on it, but this appears to be a situation where a large company (Nightforce) shamelessly muscled a small company (TacomHQ) out of their IP, knowing fully well that they have more money for lawyers.  To be fair, John does not talk about it too much, so this is just a guess on my part (although I am sure I am going to get a nastygram from Nightforce lawyers for posting this.  They seem to really enjoy pushing small independent guys around).

Charlie Tarac uses a periscope instead of a prism to optically add slope for ELR shooting.  Delta Tarac does mostly the same things except it also offsets the line of sight laterally to avoid the mirage from the barrel.

The new thing with TARAC devices for this year seems to be an adjustable version of the Charlie.  There is a large side wheel that allows you to dial up to 900MOA of extra slope.

The reason I wanted to spend a little time with Tacom was the structured barrel.  I first ran into this concept a few years ago and thought it was an interesting idea.

Initially, my plan was to pick an appropriate action and have John make me a 300NM structured barrel for an ELR bolt action rifle.  I still want a 300NM and I might put one together eventually.  However, I never quite pulled the trigger on that for a few reasons.  One is that I simply have very limited use for such a gun.  I still want one, but I do not have easy access to a place wehre I can really stretch the legs of a caliber with that kind of capability.  The reason I wanted to put one together with a structured barrel is that they are are getting very good lifetime out of these and they are very easy to get to shoot properly.  

They have several version of the structured barrel design, but fundamentally they start with a 1.5" diameter barrel blank and mill out a bunch of material.  The most disinctive features are deep longitudinal cylindrical channels drilled parallel to the bore.  The start at the muzzle and go back toward the chamber.  They do not make it all the way to the chamber.  On the outer surface of the barrel, there are additional featuers designed for eliminating vibrational nodes and increasing surface area for better heat exchange.  There is quite a lot of technical informaiton on their website: https://tacomhq.com/structured-barrels/

Structured barrels look very beefy because they start out from large diameter blanks and they are decidedly not light-weight barrels.  However, by the standards of typical match barrels they are on the lighter side of things because of how much material has been removed.  Given their impressive vibration dampening advantages, a few months ago I shifted gears and started leaning toward putting together a large frame AR around Tacom's structured barrel.

With the precisely calculated mechancial structure, these barrels acomplish two very complicated things simultaneously: they are harmonically dead and they do not get hot.

During my visit, we shot two guns with structured barrels: a 6.5CM AR-10 and a 300NM bolt gun.

We did not do mag dumps or anything that silly.  However, after 10 rounds of rather rapidly fired 6.5CM, the barrel was warm, but not hot.  Temperature distribution was arguably the most remarkable part.  Using an infrared thermometer, it was easy to show that the warmest part of the barrel was around the middle (near the gas block on the semi-auto),  The breech end of the barrel was cooler to the touch and measure at a lower temperature.  Basically, the barrel never got very hot and whatever heat it accumulated was shed very rapidly.

The feel of the recoil impulse is really odd in that it is completely muted and there was no muzzle rise to speal off.  I suspect a part of the was the muzzle brake, but this lack of discernible resonant frequencies made the recoil cycle extremely gentle.  I was shooting an IPSC at 350 yards and the recoil impulse never moved the reticle off the plate.  I fired the last four shots as rapidly as I could pull the trigger.  Everything was on the plate.  The rifle was not light at right around 14lbs with the scope, but I expected a lot more movement out of it even with the muzzlebrake.  Most gas guns have this slight "pitchiness" to them and I saw none of that.

The 300NM boltgun was slightly heavier, but with the much more powerful round the recoil did move the reticle off of the target, but not by much. 

I never lost sight of the target during the reocil impulse and the feel was, again, very muted and controllable.  I am not sure how heavy the boltgun was, but definitely less than 20lbs.  I would guess it was around 17lbs, but I'll check with John.

While both guns were very impressive, the semi-auto shot unlike any other gas gun I have ever pulled the trigger on.  No gas gun ever has a truly free floated barrel, since there is a gas block attached to it.  However, the combination of the structured barrel with a unque way that John has of putting the upper together, is the closest I have seen to date.

He bonds the barrel extension to the upper receiver and then screws a shouldered barrel into that.  The upper receiver is the Aero M5E1 Enhanced since the beefy upper receiver extension helps decouple the handguard from the barrel.  Also, the rather beefy structured barrel needs a large diameter handguard which this is.  The gas block they make is a custom affair that is probably better described as "tunable" rather than adjustable.  It is not designed for making frequent adjustments.  The idea is to tune your gas system for perfromance and reliability, then leave it alone.  I plan to do exactly that.

Since I was heading this way, I brought the necessary pieces with me for John to put together a 6.5CM upper for me.   Originally, I was thinking of doing it in 6XC for local PRS matches, but now that I shot with it, I want to try using it for NRL Hunter as well.  I think I can make weight without too much trouble.  I'll stick with 6.5CM in order to make power factor for Hunter matches.

Saying that I was impressed would be a gross understatement.  The feel of this gun is absolutely unique and it has recoil control behavior of a 25lbs gun in a 14lbs package.  It is quite remarkable.  Now, in the grand scheme of things, with my nearly 300lbs bulk backing up the gun, recoil control is a relatively straightforward affair.  Since my kids were there with me, I had both of them shoot both guns and watched the recoil cycle very carefully.  The guns barely moved even with a much smaller human behind them.

I know it sounds like magic, but it isn't.  I am not a mechanical engineer, but I spent a good amounf of time going over the materials and thinking through what they are doing with these barrels.  The science behind it is pretty solid.  I am not seeing any obvious holes in their foundational reasoning.  The execution is difficult and the barrels are not cheap.  Aside from good ideas, it takes a lot of skill and know-how to make these.  There is a good chance I will make a permanent switch to these barrels on what I consider my "heavy" precision guns while sticking with the Fix as lighter guns they way they were originally intended to be.  When I say heavy, I mean sub-20lbs with everything and light is sub-13lbs with everything (scope, suppressor, bipod).

Before I wrap up, let's get back to the heat management argument for a moment.  The 300NM I shot was significantly accurate and it is at a bit over 2800 rounds.  That sounds outlandish given that is nearly triple of I would expect out of this caliber.  However, if the chamber never gets very hot, it is possible.  I really want to know how long the 6.5CM John is building for me will last.  I have high hopes.

 

 

Read full Article
Available on mobile and TV devices
google store google store app store app store
google store google store app tv store app tv store amazon store amazon store roku store roku store
Powered by Locals