DarkLordOfOptics
Politics • Science & Tech • Sports
Guns, Optics, 2nd Amendment and resisting the Left in everything they touch.
Interested? Want to learn more about the community?

Learn more first
The AK of ARs

This thought experiment is courtesy of an interesting discussion with @Wolfward and @TheMarksman
How would I put together a semi-basic AR that goes on a rack to be used by a broad range of people for a variety of basic AR tasks.
Let's say a major earthquake just took half of California underwater, while at the same time two simultaneous hurricanes half drowned the bulk of the Eastern seaboard. Basic services and utilities are going to be out for at least a couple of weeks or more. Eventually, civilized life is going to be restored, but in the meantime, the dregs of society will make their presence known.
You get together with your neighbors and find a way to keep your neighborhood reasonably protected. Chances are, this will not descend into outright civil war, but armed patrols by groups of two to four people might be in order.
I need to build five general purpose ARs for that. They will be carried a lot and shot very little. However, if they end up needing to be used... they REALLY need to work well.
As you round up your neighbors, some have good firearms experience. Others have only seen a gun in the movies. Most are somewhere in between.
How do you put together an AR that will work for all of them?
That's why I called this article "The AK of ARs". An AK is a basic tool that's easy to use for almost everyone, yet it can do a lot in the right hands.
Mind you, for this exercise, I am not trying to control costs too much. There is nothing extravagant here, but I am not going to go cheap either.

I went onto Faxon website to look at barrel because I was planning to do this build around either their Gunner or Pencil barrel profiles and realized that they have a fully built AR that is almost identical to what I would choose, the Sentry model:
https://faxonfirearms.com/faxon-sentry-16-5-56-rifle/

It is right at 6lbs without optics, which is very good. It comes with ambi controls, collapsible stock (important for fitting people of very different sizes), Gunner barrel, long handguard that covers the and protects gas block and gas tube, decent general purpose grip:
16" 556 Gunner Profile Barrel - Nitride Coated
Enhanced Forged Receiver Set w/ Tensioning Screw
Nitrided M16 BCG w/ Superfinish
15" M-LOK Aluminum Handguard
Hiperfire EDTDM Single Stage Trigger
Ambi Charging Handle
Radian Talon Ambi 45/90 Degree Safety Selector
Magpul MOE SL® Carbine Stock or similar
Magpul MOE® Grip or similar
Faxon MUZZLOK® Muzzle Device
Mid Length Gas System
Rifle Weight: 6.1 lbs
They also have a lighter weight Ion rifle, but that adds a few things that might compromise reliability and durability, like carbon fiber handguards and lightened reciprocating parts.

Honestly, when I was going to configure a rifle out of pieces, I was planning to do an almost identical build, except with a Reptilia Recc-E stock:
https://alnk.to/gVJ2rgV
I discovered that stock somewhat recently and it has become my favourite.
I also prefer the MCMR handguard from Bravo Company: https://alnk.to/dAkDOEi
I find that slim handguard with mlok slots everywhere gives me very good options for hanging lights and other stuff on it should I want to.

With optics, I am going to stick to my guns. For this application, Primary Arms GLx 2x is the best currently available option: https://alnk.to/fHjJzZq
At 11 ounces, it is not terribly heavy. It requires no manipulation except for turning on illumination should you be so inclined. It has proven to be very robust. It has very flexible eyerelief which makes it easy to get behind for a very broad range of people. The reticle illumination adjusts from night vision compatible to daybright. In other words, if you want to do more with this optic, you can.
If you put the rifle back on the rack without turning illumination off, it has a motion sensor, so it shuts off on its own. For shooting within a couple of hundred yards, it is plenty of magnification without slowing you down too much. Unlike red dots, it works with nearly all eyes.
While GLx has proven to be remarkably robust, my paranoia demands a supplementary sighting system, preferably something that does not rely on batteries.
For that there are a couple of options and the one I really like comes from XS Sights in the form of their offset XTI2 sights. While they have a tritium version available, I am partial to the less expensive model with huge orange dot up front: https://alnk.to/8PCbkiW
Beyond that, a flashlight is a good idea. They vary tremendously in price and quality. I am not a flashlight snob, but one thing I know is that if I am setting something up for general purpose use, I prefer to not have wires running all over the place. From an ease of use and weight standpoint, I'll lean toward Inforce WMLx: https://alnk.to/cwQ5VuU

As configured, the rifle comes from Faxon for around $1150. The scope is $370. Offset sights are $125. The light is $170.
We have a well equipped rifle for under $1900. Five of these will cost almost $10k...

I did say that it was something of a budget build....

With cheap rifles and cheap red dots, you can get five guns well under $5k.
For example, if I were seriously looking to do something like this, I would just wait for a good sales and pick up five rifles like this one from Palmetto for $500 each: https://alnk.to/7fnmv7n
Pop five of the these PA red dot sights on them: https://alnk.to/hDo4nhY since they have Autolive, the practical battery life should not be a concern.
On two out of five, I would throw on a compact 3x magnifiers: https://alnk.to/7fnmvba also at $200 each.
It forgoes some niceties, but now I am only $3900 plus tax and shipping in, instead of $9k.
The big question is whether I am sacrificing reliability with a cheap AR. I probably am, but that is a bit of an open question. These days, even cheap ARs are fairly robust and I know how to make them run if I get a chance to test them.
The one remaining point that was brought up is that after some amount of rapid fire, aluminum handguarrds get hot.
For $45 I can get one of those Hot Pocket rail wraps that mitigate the heat.

The nice thing with going with a mid-range rifle like the one from Faxon or something built around a Ballistic advantage Hanson profile barrel (https://bit.ly/43gCH8O) is that you are very likely to end up with pretty accurate rifle that can be coerced into an SPR role with nothing more than an optic change.

Interested? Want to learn more about the community?

Learn more first
What else you may like…
Videos
Posts
Articles
Gideon Mediator RDS

The overall trend with red dot sights is toward the enclosed design variety. We can have a nice discussion on whether that trend is counterproductive or not and I can argue both for an against it.
Overall, I think enclosed red dot sights do have an edge, but making them well and on a budget cane get a little tricky. It is much easier to make compact high quality open emitter red dot sights with a relatively large window.
The most undeniable advantage of enclosed red dot sights is their performance during inclement weather. They are much easier to keep running in snow, rain, mud, etc.
Gideon's enclosed RDS is called the Mediator.
https://alnk.to/8iUBbdn
It has been very capable during the time I have had it.
After moving it from gun to gun quite a bit, I decided to set it up as an offset optic on a DMR-ish rifle where Delta Stryker 1-10x28 is the primary optic. It works very nicely in that role.

00:07:03
Swampfox Raider 1x Prismatic

Continuing with the overview of compact 1x prismatic sights, here is the rundown on the Raider from Swampfox optics.
https://alnk.to/dAnkrFp

The look and feel are really very similar between the Raider and the Advocate from Gideon, but the reticles are different and there are slight differences in FOV.

Overall, it is a very competent optic and the choice, increasingly, comes down to which reticle you prefer. It is really a function of which sight picture appeals to you the most.

00:12:46
Gideon Advocate 1x Prismatic

As I work through the different 1x prismatics I have on hand, the first thing that comes to mind is how mature this category has become and how rapidly that happened.
I have four 1x prismatics here and while they are not identical, they are all very capable. To a good degree, the choice between them might simply come down to personal preference and how you plan to use the optic.
As a red dot replacement, Gideon Advocate is definitely one of the better options on the strength of good image quality and simple reticle.
https://alnk.to/2FCl7M7
For $230, you could do a lot worse.

00:05:47
October 30, 2024

Hey ILya, what are your thoughts on the S+B MT II turrets vs. the DT II+ turrets and CCW vs. CW turrets?

October 28, 2024

Some good deals on March scopes for one day. 20% off when in the cart. Too bad no 10-60x but the 5-42x is tempting but I already have three...........

https://bulletcentral.com/optics/?sort=featured&limit=12&mode=4&_bc_fsnf=1&in_stock=1&mc_cid=7fe35db7c1&mc_eid=d7bcc58269&brand=153

October 26, 2024

Had some J-walkers on the way to the range this AM:

NRL Hunter Planning
Rifle Configurations

As I have mentioned previously, I am looking to shoot in a couple of NRL Hunter competitions in 2025.  I have many reasons for that: preparation for the Team Challenge, leading by example (trying to get my kids interested) and simply having fun are all contributing factors.  The "trying to get my kids interested" is what usually gets me a hall pass from my wife, so that one is an integratl part of the reasoning.

One aspect of this whole decision process that needs to be addressed is the almost inevitable paralysis by analysis that every gear junkie is bound to develop when looking at the options.

Given my comparative inexperience and relatively limited shooting skills, I think my best bet is to not overthink it.  Just set up a rifle for the Open Heavy class and go practice.  I intend to shoot 6.5CM, hopefully with factory ammo.  Given that, a ltitle extra weight for controlling recoil and having good information for the second shot after I miss the first one, should be beneficial. 

On the other hand, since there are many ways to win the race for the last place, I could not help myself and tentatively configured rifles (on paper for now) for both Open Heavy and Open Light.  I plan to build them all up exactly as described below and figure out how contorted of a shooting position my aging joints can tolerate with each one.

The idea, for now, was to simply look at what I have and play with different configurations.

Only for Supporters
To read the rest of this article and access other paid content, you must be a supporter
Read full Article
SeeAll Sights
A solution looking for a problem

I was at the range again...

It appears that I start many of my posts with that phrase.  I should probably stop making that disclaimer.  At this point it should be abundantly apparent that I spend a lot of time at the range.

I always have a good reason.  I cleaned the barrel of my muzzleloader yesterday and needed to make a couple of fouling shots before I go hunting tomorrow.  Since I was there anyway, I figured I should do some tripod shooting practice, so I brought one of my ARs with me.  It is an unusual AR since it has a very unique AlSiC wrapped barrel.  AlSiC (Aluminum Silicon Carbide) is an interesting material that can be tuned to perfectly match thermal expansion of whatever it is wrapped around.  It has an incredibly high thermal conductivity coefficient, so it absorbs heat very fast and sheds it equally quickly.  There was a company looking to make barrels where isntead of carbon fiber, a thin steel barrel is wrapped in AlSiC.  The project did not pan out (they vanished on me at some point), but they did make me one barrel.  It has an intereting property in that it seems to exhibit very little POI shift with heat.  It is not the most accurate barrel I have, but it is accurate enough and it is consistent.  It runs a little on the slow side, but it works.  Somehow this rifle ended up being the test bed for the Delta Stryker 3.5-21x44, which happens to be one of my favourite precision gas gun scopes, so I shoot this rifle a lot.  So much so that I think I am going to go swap out the Bootleg Camlock handguard currently on it for the 12" Q Honey Badger handguard I have.  For what it is worth, while I really like the adjustable bolt carriers from Bootleg, their Camlock handguard is a wobbly, bendy, slidy piece of crap.

There are many excellent handguards on the market.  I tend to default to the ones from Q more often than not, but I have several I like from BMC, Aero, MI, etc.  They are all good.  They all work.  Bootleg's Camlock does not stay put.  The engagement of the handguard to the barrel nut is poorly designed.

Moving on...  after hitting the 220 yard plate a couple of times with the iron sighted muzzleloader, I decreed it "good enough to take a shot at a mule deer on an off chance I see one" and switched to the AR-15.

With cheap 55gr ammo, I keep my practice to within 450 yards or so.  The range where I shoot has conveniently placed a bunch of plates at ~430 yards for me to practice on.  I verified zero from the bench (I move stuff around so much, that it is good practice) and transitioned to shooting off of a tripod.

For some reason, I have a very hard time taking a good picture of this reticle handheld.  I'll have to get my fixtures out.  Either way, the above pictuer was taken on 21x and the hangers you see at the bottom left quadrant are at !430 yards.  The illumination is on max setting and is visible but not nuclear on a bright New Mexico day.  Only the main stadia are illuminated, which I like.

Part of routine practice is to shoot offhand using both the primary optic (on low power) and secondary optic.  That's when it dawned on me that I have never really talked much about the SeeAll Sight that I use for redunduncy on a few guns.

https://www.seeallsights.com/

It is a weird looking thing that sorta straddles the gap between iron sights and red dot sights.  It found its home somewhere in that "no mand's land".  It works and it is probably a better option than irons, especially under challenging light conditions.  However, modern red dot sights walk all over it.  Still, I have several of these, which brings up an obvious question: why?

There is really one main reason: they are cheap.  If you check on them through the year and have a little patience, you wil stumble onto some sort of a half off sale.  If that happens late at night after you have been exploring some of the finer qualities of your bourbon collection, you might end up with half a dozen of them.  Ask me how I know.

The sight is very simple.  It is, essentially, a block of greenish edge glow material, a reticle etched on it and a simple lens to project that reticle to your eye.  Some also have tritium for night time use.  They have a couple of picatinny mount versions and a couple of direct mount versions (RMR and RMS).  I have a tleast one of each.  Keeping them properly mounted seems to require a good amount of loctite, but once everything is set up, they stay put and stay zeroed.

The one you are looking at is the RMR base one sitting on Swampfox' rather excellent offset mount.  

Here are the strenghts and weakness of this thing in a nutshell.

 

Strengths:

-small, light, cheap

-focus on the target, not on the aiming point (like on a red dot)

-no batteries

-forgiving of eye astigmatism

 

Weaknesses:

-open design that does not do great in inclement weather

-you bisect the target with the top edge of the sight, so the bottom half of the sight picture is blocked

-eye position is not terribly forgiving (kinda like the irons)

-accuracy with these is tricky

 

If you are setting up an offset optic to use as a primary sight at close range, this is not a good option for you.  

If this is mostly something to get you a little redunduncy, it is not a bad option.  In practical terms, I struggle shooting with this thing beyond 100 yards and I am much happier with it inside of 50.  I can shoot it relatively quickly, but it is distinctly slower than the red dot.  I do not see any speed advantage with this thing over irons unless it is pitch black.  If there is enough light to see the target, there is enough light for the irons and for the SeeAll sight.

Now, if your eyes have a hard time focusing on the front sight, the SeeAll Sight might work a lot better for you. 

Before you all rush out to buy one of these, do keep in mind that you can pick up RS-15 from Primary Arms for $120 right now.  https://alnk.to/9buj4aU  RS-15 is a vastly superior sight to the SeeAll.

However, if you stumble onto a sale where SeeAll sights are going for a $100 or so around Black Friday, it might not be a bad idea to pick one up.  Perhaps, it will agree nicely with your eyes.

Taking a photo of a proper sight picture with this thing turned out to be pretty difficult:

They do have a couple of decent picture with the two available reticle on their website.  

Once I get some of my fixturing set up, I'll take a couple of better pictures and update this post. 

Either way, I know that my take on these sights is a little bipolar.  On one hand, in the grand scheme of things, I am really not a fan.  The way I shoot offhand, I like to drive the gun onto the target and that works very well with red dot sights and not very well with irons or the SeeAll sight.  On the other hand, I have a lot of guns. I like having backup optics on them.  SeeAll Sights do work.  They are wonky, but they work.

 

 

Read full Article
Getting ready...
Muzzleloaders, iron sights and scout scopes

This weekend is my last "tag" hunt of the year.  4th choice deer hunt in a place that is unlikely to have any deer.  

On top of that, it is a muzzleloader only hunt and muzzleloaders in New Mexico are now "iron sights only".


I plan to head out Friday and return no later than Sunday night.  Technically, I have five days for this hunt.  Practically, I rather like being married, so a weekend is all I get.  The unit where I'll be hunting is mostly private land.  After significant amount of e-scouting, I think I converged on an area that looks like it will be my best bet.  Temperatures will get into the mid-to-high 80s this weekend, so snake gaters it is.  I suspect all self-respecting deer will be taking a nap somewhere during the day, so my best bet is to do a lot of glassing around dusk and dawn and look for water.

Only for Supporters
To read the rest of this article and access other paid content, you must be a supporter
Read full Article
Available on mobile and TV devices
google store google store app store app store
google store google store app tv store app tv store amazon store amazon store roku store roku store
Powered by Locals