DarkLordOfOptics
Politics • Science & Tech • Sports
Guns, Optics, 2nd Amendment and resisting the Left in everything they touch.
Interested? Want to learn more about the community?

Learn more first
Happy New Year!

As 2022 comes to a close, I am surrounded by dreary skies and drizzling rain. I somehow ended up coming to California for a family visit and running into rain. In Southern California. The land of eternal bloody sunshine.

Either way, in the grand scheme of thing, the end of one year and a start of another is a somewhat arbitrary date on the calendar.

It took a little time for the Western World to settle on January 1st as the start of the New Year and many other cultures do it differently. For Jews (although we are generally happy to celebrate anything festive), the New Year is essentially a harvest holiday, so new year starts in the fall. It is right around the autumnal equinox when day and night are about the same length in the fall. Chinese New Year is sort of a "start of the spring" thing that is typically around the end of January, but they have a complicated lunisolar calendar that I have not looked into in any detail. I glanced at it briefly and it looks like the New Year is either 3rd of 4th new moon after the winter solstice. I'll be damned if I know why. I made a note to do some research, but if you have any insight, please enlighten me. Our New Year, the way we know it, started in the early days of the Roman empire even before the foundation of the republic. As I understand it, the date did not really stick originally and it moved back and forth a few times between January 1st and March 25th or, roughly, between just after winter solstice when the day is shortest and vernal equinox when the day and the night are of the same duration in the spring.
January 1st became somewhat more official in the days of Julius Caesar a few decades BCE when the Julian calendar was introduced. It lasted for about 500 years until the fall of the Roman Empire. After that, most Christian countries reverted back to either December 25th or March 25th as the celebration of the New Year. During the 16th Century when Gregorian calendar was introduced to fix a few issues with the Julian day keeping, Catholic nations switched to it almost immediately. Non-catholic Western nations took a bit longer. Britain and its colonies, for example, went Gregorian in mid-18th century.

Russia, naturally, adopted the most bass-ackwards approach yet (with a possible exception of the Chinese approach that I have not yet figured out). Technically, Eastern Orthodox church counts its adherence to the Julian calendar from the council of Nicea, although the split between different branches of Christianity we have today had not yet happened. Russia, allegedly, adopted Christianity in 988 and the Julian calendar with it... except they celebrated the New Year on March 1st. I am not especially sure why, perhaps because that is around the time when, in Russia's heartland, you are so tired of the bloody winter that you need something to look forward to. That's just my theory though. I am sure there was a good explanation, but as far as the official documents were concerned, September 1st was the start of the New Year, while as far as getting hammered was concerned, March 1st was it. In the middle of the 15th century, even the Russians got tired of this nonsense and September 1st became the general purpose New Year, until Peter The Great came to power in late 17th century, spent a few years in Europe and discovered that Gregorian calendar seems to work pretty well without any extra days or other unnatural exertions. He switched the New Year to January 1st, primarily for business reasons to match his European trading partners. Russian Orthodox church, however, viewed the Gregorian calendar as a secret plot by those damn catholics to subvert the purity of the orthodox religious experience, so they stayed with a version of the Julian calendar. Russia was still out of sync with Europe, but in a less screwy way. They were only off by a couple of weeks which is "practically on time" by russian standards.
In 1918, a couple of months after the Communists came to power, they noted that the world-wide revolution might not happen on time if the calendars do not match. Communists took an equally dim view of both Catholic and Eastern Orthodox churches, but changing the calendar in the rest of the world was a little far fetched even for them. With that in mind, in 1918, they informed the enlightened citizens of the Soviet Union
that January 31st (old style) is to be followed by February 14th (new style). The enlightened did not mind and the unenlightened did not care enough about those two lost weeks to risk getting shot. Eastern Orthodox church was suppressed, but not dead, so it assumed that the whole Gregorian calendar thing is a plot by both Catholics and Communists and stuck to their own significant dates, except very quietly and without attracting unwanted attention from the Commissariat.
To date, Russian Christmas is about a week after the New Year. I am sure there is a good reason for it, but I am not even going to try to reason what it is.
I am equally happy to celebrate the New Year, Rosh Hashanah and Christmas whenever they happen to fall. They are pretty festive holidays and I like the joyous spirit. Rosh Hashanah has some measure of religious significance for me, while January 1st is the New Year I grew up with. However, this is one of those rare cases where I truly do not discriminate.

Why is any of this important? It isn't. I just find this whole historical calendar mess amusing and I promised to not talk about politics until the new year. This way, I can take a dig at Russia without getting political.

May you all have a Happy New Year! Let's hope and pray that 2023 is a less screwy year for all of us than 2022 was on both micro and macro scales.

Interested? Want to learn more about the community?

Learn more first
What else you may like…
Videos
Posts
Articles
Blast From The Past: Millett ZoomDot RDS

I dug this thing up purely by accident. It has been a long time since I used it for anything, but I am thinking I should, especially as I work on a magnifier video.

MIllet's ZoomDot was a unique red dot sight that had auto brightness and variable dot size from 1MOA to 10MOA.

Early ones, like mine, were made in the US. Millett had some aspirations of selling these to the US military.

I do not think they got very far, then the company was bought by Bushnell and essentially shut down after a little bit. At some point, the manufacturing for the ZoomDot moved to China and it was not really the same.

00:05:44
Scout Scopes: Burris 2.75x20

Scout scopes are almost like a forgotten art form these days. There is an occasional discussion either on how they are the greatest thing since sliced bread because 1) THE colonel said so 2) if you do not think they are, refer to rule number 1.
Alternatively, the prevailing thought is that they are completely useless and if LPVOs existed in Jeff Cooper's time, there would never be such a thing as scout scopes.
The truth, as is usually the case, resides somewhere in the middle.
Scout scopes do have their place, but they are definitely a niche product. It is, however, an interesting niche.
Scout scope pickings are relatively slim in terms of what's on offer.
Leupold makes a 1.5-4x28 https://alnk.to/gKSibYj
Burris makes a 2-7x32 and 2.75x20
Vortex has a 2-7x32 in the Crossfire line
There are also a few out there from UTG, Aimsports, etc.

I strongly lean toward compact fixed power designs, so Burris 2.75x20 https://alnk.to/cSJCBQx is probably my favourite and is the subject of this ...

00:11:58
Integrix M1 MRAD Reticle in the 3-18x44

Wind was really making things difficult, but at least this gives you a look at the reticle.
It is a respectable design that is conceptually closer to SKMR reticles than to the ones I usually gravitate to. They also have an M2 that is, I think, a little better.
In the grand scheme of things, the M1 did not take me long to get used to and it is not giving me any real issues.
https://alnk.to/9TaI2kH

00:06:33
Integrix 3-18x44 Tracking Follow-up

I reached out to Leapers to relay the issues I found with reticle sizing and tracking in the 3-18x44 scope they sent me.

They confirmed that the scope I have here is an engineering model. They also talked to engineering and, apparently, they found the same issues I did with the mrad model and fixed them for the production run.

The MOA model (https://alnk.to/eZIJo9a) is, according to them, spot on. The issues were only present in pre-production mrad scopes.

Once they get production scopes going, I plan to re-visit them. I think the first one to become available will be the 4.5-27x model with the M2 Mrad reticle. I saw it during SHOT and I think it will be more up my alley than the M1, though the latter is still serviceable.

This is strange but once in my lifetime I felt fortunate to be not smart enogh to be in Harvard University...

Memorial Day Sales

I am beginning to see some early Memorial Day Sale emails in my inbox.
If I see anything interesting, I'll add it to this post which will be pinned to the top, rather than inundate you with incessant "it's a sale!" emails. Better keep it all in one spot.

The first one I see is from Opticsplanet. https://alnk.to/cwU58u8
They have all sorts of stuff rom Burris and Steiner discounted including the recently introduced Burris XTR PS 5.5-30x56 for $2199 https://alnk.to/d3Em4Su and the rather unusual Steiner T6Xi 3-18x56 https://alnk.to/ge7ZJBN
Eliminator 6 gets you $400 of bonus bucks to use on something else. https://alnk.to/flycPy8

Tract Optics will be running a 10% storewide sale starting Thursday with the discount code "REMEMBRANCE". While I generally like their products, the one that is really agreeing with me the most is the new 2.5-15x44 with MRAD Eagleman reticle. https://tractoptics.com/toric-uhd-30mm-2-5-15x44-ffp-illuminated-mrad-eagleman-long-range-hunting-rifle-scope/
I am sure ...

First PRS Match is behind me
High Noon at Del Norte

My first PRS match is officially behind me.  It was, I think an officially sanctioned regional PRS match at the shooting range called Del Norte about an hour from me (just east of Rio Rancho).
As I discussed previously, rather than using the rifle I originally prepared for it, I ended up having to change gears at the last moment and slapping a 5-25x56 Tangent on my daughter's 6ARC MiniFIx.  A lightweight 16" Proof barreled 6ARC is not an ideal set up for PRS competition, but, in the grand scheme of things, the rifle did hot hold me back at all.  I had a couple of weights that fit the Q-cert handguard, so I slapped them on there as well, which got the rifle to right around 12lbs.  The balance point was almost where I want it, but not quite.  In all other ways, this was a very handy rifle to shoot.  I am actually thinking of getting a couple more weights that I can stack on it (Sawtooth weights are stackable), so that I can shoot some future local matches with it.  It shoots Hornady's Black 105gr ammo very well (it also shoots 108gr ELD-M and 103gr ELD-X well, but I had a larger supply of Hornady Black ammo on hand).

It chrono'ed pretty consistently for factory ammo.  Here are the measurements for a 20 shot group.

If I were to take out the fastest shot, SD drops down to 8fps.  

In terms of wind performance, it is a 5mph rifle, so slightly better than the 308 ammo I was going to use originally, but not as good as the 6.5CM that was my intended match rifle for this year (we make plans, but then life happens).

I do have to admit that I really enjoyed shooting the match with the MiniFix.  So much so, that I am seriously thinking of building another one for myself, since this rifle is technically my daughter's.

The closest shot we had was a bit over a couple of hundred yards.  The furthest was around 1150.  That was a bit challenging for the 16" barreled 6ARC, especially since the terrain there is tricky and wind is doing strange things.  Morning was relatively quiet wind-wise, but then the wind becamse gusty with changing directions.

It was a one day match with about 30 shooters (six squads) and ten stages.  The 17 year old kid who won the match was in my squad with his dad.  Apparently he is on the US team, so it should not be surrpising that he won.  He was very good.

Overall level of the shooters in the match was quite good.  I really was not sure what to expect.  Somewhat paradoxically, the only matches that I have shot in so far are the much larger two day NRL Hunter matches.  In those, I am just out of the bottom third in terms of skill level.  In this match, it was pretty much in the same spot, I think.  

The terrain was a little bit like Cameo, I think (I have been there, but not shot there), with some angle changes and sufficient vegetation to make getting on target occasionally troublesome. 

Only for Supporters
To read the rest of this article and access other paid content, you must be a supporter
Read full Article
post photo preview
Updates
Getting back on the horse, little by little

My original plan was to do a livestream on Thursday of this week, but I think I'll push it out to next week.  A few days at home is doing wonders for my recovery, but my voice is still not quite there.  I do not think any of you are looking to listen to me cough for two hours straight.

Also, I am going to try to shoot that local PRS match this coming Saturday, so doign a livestream next week after the match is likely to be more productive.  It is my first one, so I fully expect that I will screw it all up.  It should be a good learning experience.  I do not have a dedicated PRS rifle and I am not looking to set one up jsut yet.  If I like it, I'll put something together, but as far as competition goes, my focus is really on UKD matches like NRL Hunter, Competition Dynamics, etc.  My 6.5CM is not back yet, so I'll just shoot it with my 308 FIx.  It is not ideal, but it will do just fine for my purposes.  I am in no danger of winning anything either way and this will stress my ability to read wind.  A secondary purpse here is that I am not 100% certain what rifle I will take on a mule deer hunt with later this year, but it will be either something new to test or this 308.  Now that I think about it, the 308 is going with me regardless either as a primary rifle or as backup.  The rifle shoots, so if I miss, I know it is on me.

For the match, I have Burris XTR PS 5.5-30x56 scope on the 308 Fix.  I think the way they did the heads up display in these is a meaningful improvement over conventional riflescopes.

https://alnk.to/d3EjPHC or https://alnk.to/8iVRlGN

Optically, I think XTR Pro is a little better, but the EO integration in the XTR PS is, I think, in advantage.

In parallel, I am looking at the replacement AAC ammo (they replaced the faulty ammo and I have chrono results on it) and testing the optics of the 40mm scopes in parallel.

 

Only for Supporters
To read the rest of this article and access other paid content, you must be a supporter
Read full Article
A first look at Steiner H6Xi 2-12x42
MPVOs are finally getting some attention

Here are some initial thoughts on the Steiner H6Xi 2-12x42.

I finally had a chance to shoot with it both supported and unsupported, which is an important part of figuring out how usable an optic is.

I found what looks to be more accurate specifications in the manual that came with the H6Xi, so the spec table is now updated:

To re-iterate from an earlier post, Eurooptic is selling the H6Xi 2-12x42 for $1350 and at that price, it is easily the best deal going in this category: https://alnk.to/90ALO3C

Only for Supporters
To read the rest of this article and access other paid content, you must be a supporter
Read full Article
Available on mobile and TV devices
google store google store app store app store
google store google store app tv store app tv store amazon store amazon store roku store roku store
Powered by Locals