Here is another nicely written question I got in a private message. A couple of small details in the phrasing are changed for privacy reasons, but it is verbatim otherwise.
I am saving to buy a TT 3-15 M or LRH. As no one around this town, that I know of has a TT, what would be your advice as for reticle? I shoot steel up to 520 yards, that the futhest in town and hunt with the rifle. It is a 6.5MM Creedmoor. Is the Gen 2 Mil Dot cross visible on 4-6 power when hunting? Or the Gen 2XR better. also how good, if there is a need to use it, the illumination?
Another choice is the LRH MRAD reticle. I am not getting any younger and my eyesight is not so good.
I like how much information he gives me here. All I have to do is double check a couple of things with a ballistic claculator and we are off to he races.
Gen 2 Mildot is a little more visible on low power than Gen2 XR. LRH Mrad is more visible than the Gen2 MilDot. Gen2 XR on lwo power sorta looks like a thin plex. In fading light, I definitely have to turn on the illumination to see it, even though my corrected eyesight is pretty good.
It sorta comes down to how you shoot. If the most important application is hunting, I would lean toward the TT315H model with the LRH Mrad reticle.
Now, that means for long range shooting, you will mostly be dialing. Given that 520yards is not terribly far for the cartridge of choice (6.5CM) and for the scope in question, your best bet for distance will be to dial elevation and hold for wind. LRH reticle gives you up to about 3.5mrad of wind holds, which is a bit over 40mph at 500 yards. If there is no wind, there is also enough holdover in the reticle for 6.5CM inside of ~600 yards, depending on which load you use. That should be plenty for most reasonable conditions.
Also, keep in mind that TT315H turrets are not going to accidentally slip on you in the field. To be fair, I have had exactly zero issues with TT315M turrets, but still, it is a bit of extra piece of mind.
Gen2XR was really developed to be a precision shooting reticle where the tree is fairly sparse. With that reticle, the idea is to mostly dial and use the tree for holds when you have to. I do both with my TT315M and I am very happy with the results. It is, however, a fairly thin crosshair, so I end up using the illumination a fair bit when on low power. It is very well sorted out illumination, of course, so I have no complaints there.
Gen2 MilDot predated the Gen2 XR. For all practical purposes, it is just a mil dot reticle with half mil hashes added to it. The lines are notably thicker (more than double) than on Gen2 XR, but there is no tree for wind holds. Gen2 Mil-Dot gives you 5 mrad of hold on both sides of the small cross that serves as the primary aiming point. That means that regardless of magnification, the opening between thick bars is 10mrad. That is very convenient for ranging with the reticle, but it is a little wider than I generally like for a hunting reticle.
That's where LRH MRAD comes in. It is essentially a "narrower" version of Gen2 MilDot with slightly thicker center lines. Thick bars are slightly tapered near the center to draw your eye toward it and the opening is 7mrad. It is a better low light reticle. Illumination is also done a little differently, so the illuminated portion is a little bigger for low light use. I am not sure which illumination scheme I like more, but probably the on in LRH MRAD and Gen2 XR. I used to prefer just the illuminated dot, but for hunting use, I am sorta beginning to like the illuminated scheme like that in the LRH. That way, I can run the illumination, so that is very dim. That does not mess with my eye adaptation, but I still have some means to correct for distance and wind. It does not make as much difference with modern flat shooting cartridges, but when I was hunting elk with a muzzleloader last winter, I could have used something like this. It would have made my life a little easier.