DarkLordOfOptics
Politics • Science & Tech • Sports
Guns, Optics, 2nd Amendment and resisting the Left in everything they touch.
Interested? Want to learn more about the community?

Learn more first
Magnification and slings

Here is an interesting question I received on one of the forums:
"I searched the forum for answers to no avail.
I am not a PRS shooter.
In my context, I prefer to shoot standing, kneeling, sitting, and prone using sling-supported positions i.e. no bipods or tripods etc.
Taking my context into account, I am wondering if you would have any thoughts on what the maximum magnification a scope could have, while being employed from sling-supported shooting positions, without being so powerful as to make shooting impossible due to image wobble?
For example, I am confident I could use a 9x from a sling-supported standing position, but a 12x or higher I do not know.
Does my question make sense?"

This is a little bit out of the left field since comparatively few people these days shoot with support slings. It so happens that I do, but I have to admit that most of the time I shoot with a support sling uses something that is more similar to a Ching sling than to a traditional loop sling. I do have one proper 1903 sling, but it is attached to a rifle that has dual aperture iron sights on it. That particular one is a biothane sling from Turners. It is a pretty respectable shooting sling and an even better tourniquet.

Most of the sling I use come from Mr Rifleslinger: https://rifle-craft.com/

I believe these to be the best general purpose two point slings on the market today and of the four models he has produced over the years I have at least a couple of each.

The gentleman behind this company is the same guy who wrote what is likely one of the most extensive series of articles on shooting with a sling, practical shooting accuracy, shooting quickly with a boltgun and a bunch of other things. He stopped updating his blog, but for now it is still up and it is a very worthwhile read: https://artoftherifle.com/

Now onto the question at hand: how much magnification can you use when shooting with a support sling? The answer, unsurprisingly, is a resounding "it depends".

The wobble you see in the sight picture really does not depend on the magnification. The magnification makes it look a little different, but in terms of actual POA wobble, all things being equal, it will be exactly the same on any magnification. The natural question is then why not just put the scope on the highest magnification, then? Well, because all things are not equal. Not all shooters are equal. Not all guns are equal. Not all scopes are equal. Not all shooting positions are equal.

There is a nasty trick that our bodies tend to play on us when we are aiming: when we see a wobble in the sight picture, we start subconsciously trying to correct it which only increases the wobble zone. That is one of the primary reasons to to not go too high up in magnification. A lot of that can be trained for and some people (not me) are better at it than others. There is really no way to predict how exactly that will pan out for each individual shooter. Personally, I tend to use the lowest magnification that allows me to see the target clearly enough. Naturally, if you happen to be shooting at something comparatively small, a little more magnification will go a long way.
It so happens that I have done a lot of shooting with a support sling and a 3-15x50 scope (TT315M). The way it usually works out for me is that 15x is perfectly usable when shooting prone, but for everything else I am a little more accurate with less magnification. I can't suppress my brain's subconscious attempts to correct things well enough. Perhaps, I am not good enough at finding my NPA, but to be honest, I do shoot reasonably well with a sling. I have had a lot of practice.
Fair disclaimer: with a sling I mostly shoot prone, sitting and a few version of kneeling. A lot of people seem to like the squatting position, but I am a bit too old and fat for that one. When shooting standing, the sling might provide some psychological help, but I do not think it actually stabilizes anything. I have tried it a few times and I actually shoot worse if I try to use the sling while standing. I do tend to drive the gun while shooting standing rather than try to settle into a wobble zone. It seems to work a little better for me.
Another factor to consider is that your eye position with respect to the scope is going to be a little different in different shooting positions. In practical terms, that means I will set the scope up so that it is perfectly located for shooting slung and prone. When transitioning to other shooting position, there usually isn't enough eyebox to use the same high magnification without weirdly contorting my neck even if I wanted to. In order to keep my neck relatively unstressed, I HAVE to drop the magnification a bit.
It does vary from person to person, so the only way to really figure this out is to experiment. I have done exactly that. When prone, I seem to end up around 12x most of the time whether shooting slung or off a bipod. When shooting offhand, I shoot best with the scope around 3x. Sitting position is somewhere in between and it sorta depends on how forgiving the eyepiece of the scope is.

Interested? Want to learn more about the community?

Learn more first
What else you may like…
Videos
Posts
Articles
Vortex Defender XL Green

This is the second time Vortex' Defender XL crosses my path. I was very impressed with the original red dot version, so I was curious to see how the one with the green dot works for my eyes.
To get the details, see the attached video.
The cliff's notes version is that I am just as impressed with this one. In terms of collimation quality and parallax control, it is quite exceptional.
https://alnk.to/881BEV1

00:10:20
Primary Arms HTX-1 US Made red dot sight

I've had this RDS for a bit over two months now and I am beyond pleased with it.
Despite some spirited abuse, it keeps soldiering on.
https://alnk.to/1C9z5dw
It is a very nice RDS and being fully made in the US does not hurt either.

00:13:03
Delta Stryker 3.5-21x44 Wrap-up

This scope comes up a lot since I really like the configuration. It is time to do a final wrap-up of it.

It is one of my favourite scopes on the market today, especially for the money, since I naturally lean toward general purpose-ish designs. Still, while the 3.5-21x44 Stryker is relatively compact and light, it still clearly leans toward the precision side of things, which suites me very well.

https://annexdefense.com/optics-and-optic-accessories/delta-optics/

00:10:25
Something to consider

I had an interesting conversation earlier today that made me think. I was approached by a company called TourHero.

Apparently what they do is organize various tours, trips, etc in partnership with different influencers.

The influencer does the marketing, i.e. convince his/her audience to buy this customized tour, while the company does all of the logistics.

The idea is that they get several people to pay extra for a tour package which pays for the influencer in question to come along and, apparently, make some money on top of it, depending on how much the influencer is able to get out of his/her followers.

How I got on their radar is very unclear since they are very focused on the Instagram crowd and I have a very small Instagram channel. https://www.instagram.com/darklordofoptics/

My best guess is that they saw the picture of my daughter and me after her antelope hunt and made some sort of an incorrect conclusion. Frankly, the types of the things that they push require levels of narcissism that I ...

Uncooled Thermal with a little bit of history

There is, as always, an entertaining discussion happening in the Hide, but I do not feel like getting into another protracted argument about comparative merits of different uncooled cores with people who do not know a whole lot about them. I mentioned that BAE is getting out of the uncooled core business. The responses were interesting.

Still, I thought some of the background on uncooled cores is worth rehashing since I was around for most of it and involved in some of it. Hopefully, you'll find it informative. If not, this post will fade like many others before it.

Here is a little history on uncooled cores from an eyewitness.

I was working at Raytheon when it was starting out and one of my first projects over there was trying to figure out how to calibrate early uncooled cores for a military project that eventually ended up going into ENVG.

The uncooled technology was first developed by Honeywell and after a while they licensed it to a bunch of people. Honeywell developed the technology, but did not ...

Another G&A Article

For the few of you who still pay attention to print magazines, I have an article in the latest Precision Rifle Shooter, called "Optics For NRL Hunter". For those of you who have been following my stumbling and bumbling match shooting exploits, there isn't going to be anything new there. You know what I think on the subject.
However, I still get some sort of a weird nostalgic kick out of seeing something I write printed on paper.
When I was growing up in the Soviet Union, my room doubled as a family library. I think it is some latent aftereffect of spending my childhood with books. Gen-Xers have a reputation of spending their childhood outdoors doing whatever mischief came to mind and that is true in my case, to some extent.
However, that is largely because at some point my mother got sick and tired of seeing me in the apartment with my nose stuck in the book. Every once in a while she would just search me for hidden books then kick me out of the house to go do something active. It ...

post photo preview
Well, that was a doozy...

My original plan was to try to set up a hunt where my daughter will have her first memorable hunting experience without working too hard.

The choice of the pronghorn hunt was largely based off of my experience in that same area last year.

The way it went last year was quite straightforward.  We drove around until we saw a large pronghorn buck.  It was a solitary animal that decided to lie down in an open area to relax.  We made a short stock, crawled the last hundred yards or so, found a good spot about 350 yards away from the pronghorn and made the shot.

https://darklordofoptics.locals.com/post/6034347/well-that-was-a-nice-morning

This year, when I decided to take my daugher on the same pronghorn hunt on the day of her 14th birthday, I figured it will be somewhere along those same lines.  It kinda was, but not quite.

Still, it worked out nicely.

In the pciture:

Q Mini-Fix with 6ARC 16" Proof Research carbon fiber barrel

Q Jumbo Shrimp supressor

Gunwerks Elevate 2.0 bipod

Telson Toxin 3-18x50 riflescope

Leica Geovid Pro AB+ LRF binoculars

Pint-sized sticky Gamechanger bag

Unnamed pronghorn buck.  It will likely get a name once it's skull is euro-ed and is hanging on the wall.

Only for Supporters
To read the rest of this article and access other paid content, you must be a supporter
Read full Article
Arming The Children
A couple of very specific children that is

In case you were wondering, no, I am not starting an underage militia.

I do have two kids though and I am teaching them to shoot.

Only for Supporters
To read the rest of this article and access other paid content, you must be a supporter
Read full Article
post photo preview
Steiner C35 Gen2 Mount
from Annex Defense

The production version of the Annex Defense's mount for the Steiner C35 Gen2 thermal Clip-on is finally here.  At $1600 (when this is published), the clip-on is an absolute steal.

I've had it for a few days, but, me being the good old paranoid me, I spent some time shooting with it before posting anything.  I had a couple of days with it prior to last weekend's match in Montana and a couple of days after.  Another to pop it on and off a few times and get a couple of hundred rounds of 6.5Grendel through the gun to see if anything shakes loose.  So far so good.

The C35 Gen2 clip-on is sitting on my 6.5Grendel AR as a part of a long running "Only One" project that I have.  It pairs perfectly with the Steiner H6Xi 2-12x42 scope.

Here is what comes in the box from Annex Defense:

The order in which the whole thing comes togethe is pretty stragihtforward:

-slide the thermal washer onto the threaded interface extending out of the back of the clip-on

-spin the mount itself onto the threaded interface (the mount is threaded on the inside) until it can go no further

-rotate the mount so that the clip-on is properly lined up to the picatinny clamp

-once you are happy with the alignment, use the three nylon tipped set screws (you'll need an allen wrench for that) to lock in the position of the clip-on in the mount.  You need very little torque on the set screws.  They are there for one reason and one reason only: to keep the mount from spinning when you tighten the timing nut in the next step

-spin the timing nut onto the threaded interface of the clip-on to lock the mount in place.  You should not need the timing nut wrench, but one is in there just in case.

Here are the pieces laid out in the order in which you will need them.

When you are done, it should look like this:

Note that the mount normaly comes with two T20 screws.  I am using two thumbscrews instead, since I am popping the mount on and off all the time.  It seems to be staying put with the thumbscrews just fine.  I am hoping Annex will offer the thumbscrews as an option.

It is not quite an equivalent of a QD mount, but we needed something with an extremely low profile clamp to fit under scopes with fairly large objectives.  As is, the mount works with most scope that have objective lens diameter of 50mm or less.

I am using with with Steiner H6Xi 2-12x42 and the two work together exceedingly well.

Read full Article
Available on mobile and TV devices
google store google store app store app store
google store google store app tv store app tv store amazon store amazon store roku store roku store
Powered by Locals