DarkLordOfOptics
Politics • Science & Tech • Sports
Guns, Optics, 2nd Amendment and resisting the Left in everything they touch.
Interested? Want to learn more about the community?

Learn more first
Wrapping up with 2021

As another year comes to a close, I can't help but sit back and reflect a little bit. In terms of politics, you sorta know where I stand. There is no real mystery there and not all that much left to discuss. The scary sounding omicron variant of COVID is proving to be a non-issue just like sane people predicted when it first popped up. It will not stop the corporate media talking heads and booger eating morons in Washington from losing what little is left from their ever-loving minds, but there is nothing I can do about that.

I am, yet again, sitting in an airport waiting for my flight. I do a preposterous proportion of my writing while at the airport or on the plane. I can't say I am happy about it, but that's my life, I suppose. All this time spent travelling really cuts into how much time I can dedicate to recording videos. I really hope to rectify that in the coming year.

As we get into the holiday season, I will somewhat detach myself from current events assuming that even our erstwhile political leaders will be elsewhere pre-occupied over the holidays (i.e. they won't bungle up anything new), but you never know. If something interesting pops up, I'll post it, but I sure hope not. Then again, every time I go on a political sabbatical, however short, thinking that there is no possible way for something even stupider than the current nonsense to happen, I get unpleasantly surprised.

There are several semi-philosophical essays I want to finish (along the veins of "Beware of the Experts" that I published a while back). The first one will probably be on wisdom as a concept. Wisdom is one of the least used, most misused and sorely needed words in our modern vocabulary. It will, again, be an adaptation of something I wrote three years ago when I had an inkling to publish a collection of essays. I think it needs a lot of refinement though. We are going on a family trip to Idaho next week and I plan to finish it while there.

In terms of guns and optics, my plate is absolutely overflowing with reviews I am looking to finish and there are several I really want to get done with before SHOT. Wish me luck.

At the end of every year, I try to look back and see what was truly memorable in terms of the development of sporting optics. It varies from year to year, but in 2021, the most memorable thing was probably a litany of supply chain issues that started in 2020 and barely abated in 2021. Many companies struggled to introduce anything new, but a few interesting things did happen.

Unsurprisingly, Vortex' introduction of Razor HD-LHT 4.5-22x50 riflescope is at the top of my list. There is nothing revolutionary about this design except it is a new take on optical compromises. It is as perfect of a crossover hunting/precision riflescope as exists today because of how competent it is without being heavy. I have talked about it incessantly for the majority of the year and I have no intention of stopping. It absolutely kicks ass on my 308 Fix and I had the honor of being the first person to take it hunting and take an animal with it (aoudad sheep in April for those who are new to this community). I have the MRAD version: https://bit.ly/3mbUNGs
Keep in mind, given what I do here, that I can get my hands on any scope in any price range and this is the one that sits on my favourite rifle.

With LPVOs, I can't help but point out that March's dual focal plane 1-10x24 Shorty (https://bit.ly/3qpHF1N) is probably the first successful dual focal plane reticle design with magnification going down to 1x. I'll have a review up on the latest version with a tree reticle shortly, but, as it stands, with its side focus and excellent reticle visibility, this is likely the best general purpose AR-15 scope on the market today. More on that later, but I am quite impressed with what I am seeing so far. If I was forced to choose just one LPVO to use for everything this would be it. The way March designed the objective, mounting this scope is not ideal, but it is workable. Optomechanically, it is excellent and its versatility is really unmatched, at least among the scopes that are available to civilians.

With heavy precision scopes, everything I have seen this year has been somewhat evolutionary in nature. The whole market segment has become increasingly competent, but I expect things to get a lot more interesting after SHOT.

With thermal and night vision devices, interesting things have been happening. Not so much with night vision, to be honest, but there has definitely been a lot of movement with commercial thermal devices. All of a sudden, increasingly competent thermal scopes, clip-ons and monoculars can be had in $3k to $5k range. I started looking at a few and I will probably end up with a fairly complete market overview by summer 2022. So far, Leica's handheld monocular and Burris' clip-on (I have the 50mm version: https://bit.ly/3E1bb2w) seem to stand out to me, but there is a lot more to look at. I am going to set-up another hog hunt, likely in March, and use that as a platform to look at a bunch of thermal devices. All of the $5k and under thermal products out there mostly use various Chinese uncooled imaging cores and the big thing for me is how competent these are becoming. In terms of pure imaging performance, N-Vision and Trijicon using BAE cores still have an edge, I think. If I were forced to choose one general purpose thermal scope to settle on, I would still spend the money and pick up N-Vision Nox35 (https://bit.ly/3qa1XMk) or Halo-XRF (https://bit.ly/3sckPgt), most likely. However, the gap is narrowing and it is worth investigating. It is an occasionally confusing incestuous market segment, so I have my work cut out for me.

With conventional night vision devices (i.e. image intensifiers), we have several very mature products and I do not see any major changes happening. Arguably the most interesting thing, and this is more of a professional interest for me, is that several manufacturers have made good progress in making fairly high resolution SPAD image sensors. SPAD stands for "Single Photon Avalanche Diode". In a SPAD image sensor, each pixel is able to significantly amplify single levels for superior low light imaging. Canon is commercializing a 3.2MP SPAD image sensor. They are obviously not doing it for anything weapon related and it is still not sensitive enough to replace IITs, but it can make what we call "digital night vision" truly useful. It is on my list to figure out how much it is projected to cost when it is out next year. Then again, twenty years ago when I first started working with these things, everyone was convinced that digital night vision will displace traditional IITs any moment now and I am still waiting.

Now that I think about it, I realize that I promised to make a couple of educational videos on thermal and night vision devices a while back. I should really get on it...

Interested? Want to learn more about the community?

Learn more first
What else you may like…
Videos
Posts
Articles
5x Prismatic Wrap-up

This is not the end of my commentary on 5x prismatics, but it is a wrap for an unintentionally very long term project I had. I spent an unhealthy amount of time evaluating these four prismatic riflescopes:
Element Immersive 5x30 https://alnk.to/gzXEPUr
Swampfox Sabre 5x36 https://alnk.to/aAPTubq
Vortex Spitfire Gen2 5x https://alnk.to/3co4hVD
Primary Arms SLx 5x https://alnk.to/2jOhnT7

Two are large prism designs. Two are small prism designs.

The order in which I list them above corresponds to the image quality, from best to worst, although there isn't a ton of difference between SLx and Spitfire Gen2. Purely on the merits of resolution, Sabre is comparable to them as well, but much wider FOV and forgiving eyebox does put it a step above in terms of performance (at the expense of about a pound of weight). Element Immersive 5x30 is a different beast optically and it should be at a higher price at which it sells. It resolves better, has higher contrast and widest FOV of the bunch. Side-focus adds ...

00:16:40
Blast From The Past: Millett ZoomDot RDS

I dug this thing up purely by accident. It has been a long time since I used it for anything, but I am thinking I should, especially as I work on a magnifier video.

MIllet's ZoomDot was a unique red dot sight that had auto brightness and variable dot size from 1MOA to 10MOA.

Early ones, like mine, were made in the US. Millett had some aspirations of selling these to the US military.

I do not think they got very far, then the company was bought by Bushnell and essentially shut down after a little bit. At some point, the manufacturing for the ZoomDot moved to China and it was not really the same.

00:05:44
Scout Scopes: Burris 2.75x20

Scout scopes are almost like a forgotten art form these days. There is an occasional discussion either on how they are the greatest thing since sliced bread because 1) THE colonel said so 2) if you do not think they are, refer to rule number 1.
Alternatively, the prevailing thought is that they are completely useless and if LPVOs existed in Jeff Cooper's time, there would never be such a thing as scout scopes.
The truth, as is usually the case, resides somewhere in the middle.
Scout scopes do have their place, but they are definitely a niche product. It is, however, an interesting niche.
Scout scope pickings are relatively slim in terms of what's on offer.
Leupold makes a 1.5-4x28 https://alnk.to/gKSibYj
Burris makes a 2-7x32 and 2.75x20
Vortex has a 2-7x32 in the Crossfire line
There are also a few out there from UTG, Aimsports, etc.

I strongly lean toward compact fixed power designs, so Burris 2.75x20 https://alnk.to/cSJCBQx is probably my favourite and is the subject of this ...

00:11:58

Hi Ilya,

For many years I have been looking for a new spotting scope that has an FFP mil reticle for accurately calling corrections.  I have the angled version Kowa TSN-883 with 20-60 eyepiece that is great except it doesn’t have a reticle so the correction calls are not as precise or as fast as they could/should be. An ideal reticle would have a crosshair or L with a grid off of center but a simple crosshair, L or a tree would be sufficient.

I really like dual focus (can settle for single focus) that uses the small knobs that rotate very easily/smoothly so the scope can be focused on a v-bag while staying on target when it's impractical or a hassle to use a tripod. 

I also like an angled eye piece because it’s easier to establish a comfortable position in many situations as compared to straight eyepiece where you need to be directly behind the scope.  

I haven’t found anything with these attributes with max magnification and glass quality at least “good enough” for clear ...

Is it possible to integrate functions of impact 4000 into/with a scope cam system with a ocular side display, without running into patent issue?

Hey Ilya,
This may be a dumb question but is the quality control of leica binoculars and other sport optics are expectably worse compared to their photography counterparts?
I’m only asking since I have lots of excellent cameras and lenses from them and had never had any complaints for the 3 shelves of lenses I owned but the first and only binoculars I got from them seems to have a sizeable imperfection in the case of my Geovid AB+ It’s a wonderful piece of equipment throughout its range of utility and optical clarity.
However, I’m not sure if I’m cherry picking like with photography and cinematography gears but I can’t help to notice there’s a tiny hair/ crack/ glue flake in the edge of the 10 O’clock area in the right tube and it appears to be around 5mm when looking down the binos.
In photography world inperfections like this probably warrant a trip back to the factory; but I assume that similar imperfections in sporting optics doesn’t prevent it from fulfilling its ...

A morning with a chronograph

When I tell people that I am using Hornady's factory ammo for matches, I get occasionally surprised looks.  Occasionally.  Most of the time, I get fairly condescending looks from handloaders who would not let a factory round pollute the chambers of their precision rifles if their lives depended on it.

To be fair, if I had the time, I might be reloading as well.  I might be able to do better than modern factory ammo, but the truth is that I am not a quarter MOA shooter, so a lot of that would be lost on me.  The UKD matches I fidn most interesting can be done by a competent shooter with a 1MOA gun.  I am working on that first part.  I reload when I have to, but if I can get factory ammo that's not outrageously expensive and that shoots well, I will go with that every time.

I looked around and realized that I have about 600 rounds of Hornady 147gr 6.5CM factory ammo from two lots.  400 rounds from one that I will use during the match later this month.  The remainder I will likely use up practicing prior to that.

I woke up early and snuck out to the range while my family was still asleep earlier today.

I set up in the 100 yard tunnel we have.  I took my four shots to zero with the lot I plan to use for the match.  Then I fired a six shot ~0.7MOA group.  That's accurate enough for my purposes.

Here are the chronograph results:

It is slow, but accurate and consistent.

Then I shot a five round group of Hornady 147gr ammo from the other lot.

Both of those lots are not too shabby for factory ammo.  POI was within 0.2mrad between the two lots, all laterally.  

 

I had some other ammo on hand, so I fired two five shot groups with Berger 144gr hybrid target ammo and Sako TRG 136gr.

Here is what I got for five rounds of Berger:

That's not a ton of statistics, but it is a data point.  The group was ~1.1MOA

 

Here the data for the Sako TRG 136gr ammo:

This ammo showed some mild pressure signs, but not too significant.  

Again, this is not a ton of data, but Hornady is looking pretty decent here.

I'll repeat the zero retention and consistency tests a couple more times between now and June 18th when we head to Wyoming.

I might pick up a couple more boxes of Hornady 147gr from a different lot to get some more data.

More to come.

 

Read full Article
First PRS Match is behind me
High Noon at Del Norte

My first PRS match is officially behind me.  It was, I think an officially sanctioned regional PRS match at the shooting range called Del Norte about an hour from me (just east of Rio Rancho).
As I discussed previously, rather than using the rifle I originally prepared for it, I ended up having to change gears at the last moment and slapping a 5-25x56 Tangent on my daughter's 6ARC MiniFIx.  A lightweight 16" Proof barreled 6ARC is not an ideal set up for PRS competition, but, in the grand scheme of things, the rifle did hot hold me back at all.  I had a couple of weights that fit the Q-cert handguard, so I slapped them on there as well, which got the rifle to right around 12lbs.  The balance point was almost where I want it, but not quite.  In all other ways, this was a very handy rifle to shoot.  I am actually thinking of getting a couple more weights that I can stack on it (Sawtooth weights are stackable), so that I can shoot some future local matches with it.  It shoots Hornady's Black 105gr ammo very well (it also shoots 108gr ELD-M and 103gr ELD-X well, but I had a larger supply of Hornady Black ammo on hand).

It chrono'ed pretty consistently for factory ammo.  Here are the measurements for a 20 shot group.

If I were to take out the fastest shot, SD drops down to 8fps.  

In terms of wind performance, it is a 5mph rifle, so slightly better than the 308 ammo I was going to use originally, but not as good as the 6.5CM that was my intended match rifle for this year (we make plans, but then life happens).

I do have to admit that I really enjoyed shooting the match with the MiniFix.  So much so, that I am seriously thinking of building another one for myself, since this rifle is technically my daughter's.

The closest shot we had was a bit over a couple of hundred yards.  The furthest was around 1150.  That was a bit challenging for the 16" barreled 6ARC, especially since the terrain there is tricky and wind is doing strange things.  Morning was relatively quiet wind-wise, but then the wind becamse gusty with changing directions.

It was a one day match with about 30 shooters (six squads) and ten stages.  The 17 year old kid who won the match was in my squad with his dad.  Apparently he is on the US team, so it should not be surrpising that he won.  He was very good.

Overall level of the shooters in the match was quite good.  I really was not sure what to expect.  Somewhat paradoxically, the only matches that I have shot in so far are the much larger two day NRL Hunter matches.  In those, I am just out of the bottom third in terms of skill level.  In this match, it was pretty much in the same spot, I think.  

The terrain was a little bit like Cameo, I think (I have been there, but not shot there), with some angle changes and sufficient vegetation to make getting on target occasionally troublesome. 

Only for Supporters
To read the rest of this article and access other paid content, you must be a supporter
Read full Article
post photo preview
Updates
Getting back on the horse, little by little

My original plan was to do a livestream on Thursday of this week, but I think I'll push it out to next week.  A few days at home is doing wonders for my recovery, but my voice is still not quite there.  I do not think any of you are looking to listen to me cough for two hours straight.

Also, I am going to try to shoot that local PRS match this coming Saturday, so doign a livestream next week after the match is likely to be more productive.  It is my first one, so I fully expect that I will screw it all up.  It should be a good learning experience.  I do not have a dedicated PRS rifle and I am not looking to set one up jsut yet.  If I like it, I'll put something together, but as far as competition goes, my focus is really on UKD matches like NRL Hunter, Competition Dynamics, etc.  My 6.5CM is not back yet, so I'll just shoot it with my 308 FIx.  It is not ideal, but it will do just fine for my purposes.  I am in no danger of winning anything either way and this will stress my ability to read wind.  A secondary purpse here is that I am not 100% certain what rifle I will take on a mule deer hunt with later this year, but it will be either something new to test or this 308.  Now that I think about it, the 308 is going with me regardless either as a primary rifle or as backup.  The rifle shoots, so if I miss, I know it is on me.

For the match, I have Burris XTR PS 5.5-30x56 scope on the 308 Fix.  I think the way they did the heads up display in these is a meaningful improvement over conventional riflescopes.

https://alnk.to/d3EjPHC or https://alnk.to/8iVRlGN

Optically, I think XTR Pro is a little better, but the EO integration in the XTR PS is, I think, in advantage.

In parallel, I am looking at the replacement AAC ammo (they replaced the faulty ammo and I have chrono results on it) and testing the optics of the 40mm scopes in parallel.

 

Only for Supporters
To read the rest of this article and access other paid content, you must be a supporter
Read full Article
Available on mobile and TV devices
google store google store app store app store
google store google store app tv store app tv store amazon store amazon store roku store roku store
Powered by Locals