This came out of a discussion I have been having with one of the supporters here behind the scenes.
I have been pretty clear that with most situations I consider FFP riflescope to be the more flexible solution especially when distances open up beyond MPBR.
However, with LPVOs that go on 5.56 chambered AR-15s, the vast majority of shooting happens within 300 yards or so and many people only use the on 1x and 6x (or whatever happens to be the highest magnification). I am reasonably on board with that approach when we are talking about 1-4x, 1-5x and 1-6x scopes. I still use intermediate magnification quite a bit, and I prefer to have the subtensions be accurate across the board, but that is personal preference. When top end magnification gets here than 6x, I really strongly prefer FFP, because I end up a little below max magnification most of the time.
That introduces a budget problem because good quality FFP LPVOs are expensive. The Vortex Razor Gen3 I like so much is $2k https://bit.ly/3kX0dEE and dual focal plane March Shorty 1-10x24 is another $500 more https://bit.ly/30UbVsL
If you stick to good quality SFP 1-6x designs, you end up with somewhat reduced capability at distance, but superb 1x performance for a good bit less money.
If I were in the market, for such a scope, I'd just buy Delta Stryker 1-6x24 and be done with it. https://annexdefense.com/delta-stryker-hd-1-6x24-rifle-scope-do-2520-dsmr-reticle/
I think it is the best bang for the buck right now. There are better SFP scopes out there from a few manufacturers, but they cost more and I am not sure if the difference is worth the price premium.
That having been said, while looking things up for this article I stumbled onto the original Vortex Razor Gen2 1-6x24 for $900 with JM-1 reticle. That's the original heavier version, but if you can put up with a few extra ounces, it is damn near bullet proof and as close to a red dot speed as you are going to get with an LPVO (that's the scope SOF wanted when the solicitations started) https://bit.ly/3HJx8WW
The newer Gen2E version is extra $500, so if you want that Razor eyepiece, I'd give it some though and see how many ounces $500 translates into.
If you look at other high quality 1-6x24 scopes, there are a few good options out there: Leupold VX-6HD, Meopta Meostar R2 and Kahles K16i. They are all quite competent. Kahles is probably the only one that is easy to get behind as the Razor, but at around $2k, I'd just get the FFP Razor Gen3 for more flexibility. To me, a SFP LPVO, given all the things I like to do with ARs, are just not worth $2k, but your mileage vary.
As we go down in price, I can sorta justify the $1300-$1400 Razor Gen2E 1-6x24 given the eyepiece design (really easy to get behind) and the track record. However, if I can get the original Gen2 or Delta Stryker for under $1k, I'd just lean that way.
Also worth mentioning: Vortex PST Gen2 1-6x24 is a really competent scope for $600 https://bit.ly/3r6N3ZD and less if you do some searching.
What about all the other options out there from Athlon, Burris, Hawke, etc? Honestly, most are quite good. However, I really want that day bright reticle illumination on 1x and to get that reliably, I lean toward that bright fiber dot of the Stryker, Razor Gen2 and PST Gen2.