Journalisming about guns on movie sets
It has been a few days since I talked about the whole business of Alec Baldwin shooting and killing a cinematographer on set of a movie he was producing and starring in. The official reconstruction of the event by the police is not yet out, but enough information has been floating about for me to wrap up with this issues and move on. As a recap, I had to look into it carefully because a Russian-language TV/internet news program based in New York asked me to chime in. I would have looked into anyway, but that made me spend some serious time on it.
Here is a brief recap of what happened: the on-set armorer (Hannah Guttierez Reed), the assistant director who took the guns from her and handed the to the actor (David Halls) and the actor (Alec Baldwin) f-ed up. The f-ed up badly enough that a person dies. The media is full of character studies on the armorer and the assistant director, while Alec Baldwin is, naturally, getting a pass. Somehow, the guy who pulled the trigger is almost treated as an innocent victim. I suppose that's what wealth and a fancy PR person get you. Everyone in that chain of custody of the firearm used in the shooting is at fault. There were all supposed to check what's in the gun. None of them did. It really is that simple. The revolver has a drum. The drum of a 45LC single action revolver used on set can have as many as 6 rounds. Every one of those rounds had to be checked to make sure it is not a live round. They were not. That's it. It is as simple as that. Everyone in that chain of custody of the revolver used in the shooting was negligent.
I went and looked at most of the coverage of the event by the lamestream corporate media and virtually none of them can tell their ass from an elbow as far as guns, ammo and guns safety are concerned.
More agile on-line media outlets, aside from the 2nd Amendment people, by and large, are not any better.
Not a single bloody one that I was able to find understands the difference between the terms bullet, case, cartridge and ammunition.
They have no understanding of the rules of guns safety.
I suppose what used to be called "investigative journalism" where you dig deep, work hard to understand the subject and then write a well reasoned article has been replaced with "throw some nice sounding words together and assume your audience is as illiterate as you are".