DarkLordOfOptics
Politics • Science & Tech • Sports
SunwayFoto TL3240CS-Q Tripod
Catchy name...
November 10, 2022
post photo preview

As I have mentioned a little while back, SunwayFoto has introduced (and is continuing to introduce) a series of products aimed at the shooting and hunting market.

I was curious, so I got my hands on a few and have been using them.  This particualr tripod is the first of the reviews that I am publishing.  The video will be out in a week or so.

The tripod in question is TL3240CS-Q (doesn't that just roll off the toungue?) and it has spent some time on the range:

and some time in the field:

This particular tripod is very new, so I have not yet seen it at any of the retailers.  Here is a link to it on SunwayFoto's website.

A similar tripod with collar locks on the legs does seem to be available from a few retaielrs like Adorama: https://adorama.rfvk.net/Ea3q2n, but if you decide to buy it directly from SunwaFoto and use code "DLO", it will get you 5% off.

The choice between collar locks and lever lock is sorta individual.  For heavy duty applications, collar locks are probably a little more robust.  Personally, all else being equal, I prefer lever locks since they give me immediate visual confirmation on whether the leg segments are locked or not.

The tripod comes nicely packaged with 1/4-20 and M-lok ARCA plates, spike feet and all the appropriate allen wrenches.  The machining quality on everything looks quite good.  I tried the ARCA plates with a variety of clamps I have here and nothing looks to be out of spec.  Carbon fiber legs do not have any obvious manufacturing defects that I can see.

The tripod itself is an interesting design.  It has a 38mm ball head, but the non-removable ball head is integrated into the tripod so that it sits very low.  That greatly aids stability.  If you imagine a convergence point (where the axis of each tripod leg would end up), it is right where the ARCA clamp is.  Is it as stable as my heavy duty bowl top tripods? probably not.  It is more stable than I expected it to be though.  It is also light enough to take to the field with me.  This is a hunting tripod, not a longe range competition one.  SunwayFoto does have heavier duty tripods, but I was looking for somehting light enough to comfortably strap to m pack.  The tripod weighs in right around 4lbs and at that weight I am quite impressed with the stability.  The downside of setting up the ballhead that way, of course, is that you loose some range of motion.  You still get about 35 degreed in any direction from center.  That is sufficeint for my purposes.  The Arca clamp has a couple of levels integrated into it on opposite sides of each other, so you have an indicator of tilt.  Some sort of a tipping angle indicator could be good as well, in principle, but tilt is more importnat here.

There is no center column, so height adjustment is done with the legs, which is one of the reasons I like the levers.  Locking the ballhead down is also done via a lever.  Lever operation is nicely smooth.  My preferred way to set it up for shooting is with the lever on the opposite side of the tripod from me:

Most people prefer to operate the lever with their thumbs, but I like to keep my hand a little higher, so this is how I use it.

When I first received it, I went to the range and the clamp starting flopping around under recoil.  I said some uncompimentary things abotu the design that turned out to be premature.  Whoever assembled it at the factory installed the clamp onto the spline coming out of the ballhead incorrectly.  See all that air under the clamp? You are not supposed to see that.

It was installed 90 degrees off:

Once I got it properly lined up, the spline was at 90 degrees to the recoil direction which is how you want this stuff to be.

Even when installed correctly, there was a touch of extra space that I ended up shimming with some aluminum tape.  It is a common problem with most tripods out there, especially with manufacturers that come into this from the photography side of things.  Recoil does introduce considerations that do not exist in photo/video applications.  That spline should really be mated via a tapered interface to avoid a potential tolerance stack up.  Still, once I stopped exercising my vocabulary, I got it to work properly in a matter of a few minutes.  Thanks to the thin shims and a little blue loctite, nothing loosened up afterwards.

I've spent a fair bit of time shooting off of the tripod at the range and a LOT of time glassing in the field.

With a low binocular adaptor, glassing standing was slightly uncomfortable.  I am six foot tall and the tripod was just a hair too low:

Most of the glassing I did was sitting down, however, so that was not an issue.  For glassing, a center column comes in helpful for small adjustments, but for shooting it would not be good for stability.   I think this tripopd's configuration is a good compromise of size, flexibility and stability.

The legs can be opened very wide to get low and increase stability.  I played with it at the range, but in the field, I had to get above tall grass, so I could not get that low.  

I was a little concerned that I could get a spring-like effect with the legs, but 32mm carbon fiber tubes are pretty stiff.  No issues there.  Each leg can be set up at three different angles, but given the terrain I really did not exercise that very much.

Note, that in most of these pictures I am using the rifle adapter from Spartan Precision since that is how the two rifles we've been huntin with this season are set up.  That places the gun a little higher than it would be if I were going direct to a weapon mounted arca plate.

Also, keep in mind that the tripod I have came with an Arca clamp.  However, SunwayFoto does make a clamp that can attach to both Arca and picatinny rails: https://adorama.rfvk.net/ORj1xN I might get one and swap it out on this tripod.  I assume it should work fine, but I'll doublecheck. 

Edited to add: They do offer it with the dual clamp now as well.

What are my conclusions so far?

Overall, mostly positive.  Nothing failed on me in the field.  Build quality is good.  I would prefer to see a combined Arca/Picatinny clamp on this tripod.  Given the application, it would give it a little more flexibility, but with Arca being so ubiquitous what I have is a good setup.

The low mounted ballhead is an unusual and rather effective re-interpretation of a traditional tripod head.  I'll keep using it and post any updates if I uncover anything new.

 

community logo
Join the DarkLordOfOptics Community
To read more articles like this, sign up and join my community today
6
What else you may like…
Videos
Posts
Articles
PA GLx 2x Final Resting Place

Here is a final, likely, wrap up of where I think the GLx 2x from Primary Arms belongs.
It is likely the best general purpose optic for AKs and ARs I have seen in a while for shooting inside of $200. Definitely the best for the money and per ounce.
Now, when I say "inside of 200 yards" I do not mean trying to shave a hair of of a mosquito's left testicle. Assume shooting at typical subjects the size of a human torso, or a hog's vital zone.
Most of the time, I have the GLx sitting on a 300BLK pistol. I used it to teach one of my kids to shoot and it was a very easy and forgiving optic to use for a 7 year old. It is equally easy and forgiving for adults as well. It is just that easy to get behind and moderate magnification helps with the ease of use tremendously.
Now that pistol braces are verbotten, the GLx ended up on a 7.62x39 AK (a somewhat tricked out WASR-10) and I think it is going to stay there permanently.
https://alnk.to/ge40PLW
The ACSS reticle on this one is done just ...

00:12:30
SwampFox Sentinel red dot sight

This one is a very simple review:
-it is small
-it is robust
-it works they way it is supposed to
-it does not cost a huge amount of money
-the Ironside shield is a good idea
-RMSc footprint is a good idea

I messed up on price in the video. It is about $50 less than I thought at Brownells: https://alnk.to/a41u5D4

Ironsides stainless steel shield adds $40 to it: https://alnk.to/hDo4gJf

00:07:04
Kicking things off with 5x prismatics: SwampFox and Vortex

I plan to examine a few more prismatics as I go along, but here is the first installment that discusses SwampFox Saber 5x36 and Vortex Spitfire Gen2 5x25.
The interesting part is how little they have in common and how they do compromises differently.
Saber used a large CR123 battery, for example, but the housing gets in the way of a conventional offset red dots or irons should you choose to use one. However, the red dot mounted on the body of the sight, I think, works better.
Vortex, unlike the SwampFox comes with two different mount heights, so I was able to use it on both AK and AR platforms. It is more at home on a lightweight AR though.
The approaches to FOV, reticles, packaging and mounting are very different, which makes it all interesting to me.
The next video on 5x prismatics will talk about the Element Immersive 5x30 and Primary Arms SLx 5x Micro in some length.

00:24:28
May 16, 2024

Hey ILya, for a short range 16" 308 AR, would you go with a LPVO or something like the Helos 2-12x and an offset red dot?

May 15, 2024

Meopta Meostar R and/or Optika5?

I am building up a backup and/or “loaner” all-round hunting rifle… the basis of this build is a gently used Sauer 100 in .308 that I procured for a deal.

I am considering a basic 2-10x40ish or 3-15 ish, prefer quality and reliability over other considerations…

The Meoptas have peaked my interest (again).

The MeoSport R 3-15x50 seems to have a lot of features (PA/illum) and dialable (locking, no stop) turrets for a reasonable price. https://alnk.to/fHlyBbE

The Optika 5 in 2-10x42 or 3-15x44 also seem to have good (yet few) reviews. I would prefer PA, but that is not universal across the line.
https://alnk.to/e76JLQ0

Some inherent tradeoffs - weight is a bit higher than others, and the MeoSport allegedly has slightly degraded low-light performance vs the Optika5. All claim to be “assembled” in the Czech Republic.

I would let one any feedback or comparison on these scopes… or other options/brands worth considering ($600 ish).

Many thanks!

Shooting Tripod question:
One OEM guy was visiting my office yesterday and they were talking about OEM tripod products for Sig, assuming trying to compete against Athlon's in the more budget price range.
I was told that the one made for rifle shooting has a CF tube diameter of 46mm which I thought was really bigger than usual.
What is the minimal tube diameter for shooting a tripod in your opinion?

Element Immersive 5x30 Reticle Dimensions

The question of the reticle dimensions comes up occasionally.  I have shared them here and there, but figured I should post them in a more searchable post.  The scopes are available from Opticsplanet https://shrsl.com/4j1i0 and a few other places here and there https://alnk.to/3ngwfAT

There are two reticles LPR-1D MRAD and LPR-1D BDC

The mrad reticle is more of a general purpose design.

The BDC/MOA reticle is calibrated for 62gr SS109 ammo out of a 16" barrel and 200 yard zero.  It can be adapted to other loads with small modifications in zeroing process.

If you need help figuring out how either reticles works with a particular ammo/load you are working with, let me know.

They are designed to look veyr similar to each other when you have to quickly acquire the target: horseshoe is of very similar size, as is the primary aiming point.

If you have a chance to slow down and aim varefully, there are wind and lead holds in both designs.

I did a livestream on these when production samples first showed up here:

 

Read full Article
Non-magnifying Optic Parallax Error
A Dose Of Reality

The discussion of how much parallax red dot sights have pops up all the time.  It gets very emotionally charged.  Measured parallax error gets converted to MOA.  Everyone knows that MOA is right around one inch.  Large parallax error in MOA at close distances looks like a huge problem.
What is frequently forgotten is that 1MOA is exactly one inch at only one distance: ~95.5 yards.
At closer distances, it is a lot less than an inch.


Here is a table that calculates linear parallax error at different distances for a given angular error in MOA:

One of the problems is that most manufacturers of red dot sights claim their sights are parallax free.  What they really mean by that is that they are parallax free in the sweetspot (some center region) at one particular distance (usually 40 or 50 yards).

EoTech, apparently and to their credit, actually posted some numbers that are about right based on what I have seen:

The only othe rhologrpahic sight on the market, Vortex UH-1 is slightly better than that at the edges.  However, with both EOTech and UH-1, I can only see parallax error fairly close to the edges.  Most of the center portion of the window has sufficiently low parallax error that the natural dispersion of my shooting completely conceals it.  

Suppose you are doing a CQB drill and go really fast.  You end up taking a shot where the aiming point is somewhere toward the edge of the window of the sight.  Worst case, you are picking up about 10MOA of error from the optic.  That is 1.5 inches at 10 yards.  Does that constitue a problem for a CQB scenario?  Not in the slightest.  The only time I can think of when it might be an issue is a hostage-type drill, but every time I have done it, there was enough time to roughly center the aiming point in the sigh tpicture.  That brings parallax error down to zilch and you get to concentrate on dealign with gun wobble, accelerated heart rate and general stress (and that assumes noone is shooting back at you).

As the distances increase, so does the magnitude of linear parallax error, assumign a fairly constant angular error.  However, I am rapidly getting past the point where I should be taking shots at anything much beyond two hundred yards without magnification (I will be hunting deer with an iron sight muzzleloader in the fall, so I will test this out in preparation).

If I am shooting at something 100+ yards away, chances are I will have an extra second to center the aiming point.

Now, none of this means that we should not check for parallax with our holographics and red dot sights.  However, what I care about the most is the size of the sweetspot: the center area of the sight picture where parallax is negligible.  As long as it is not too small, I do not get too hung up on the parallax performance at the edges.

Read full Article
HET8: Top Level Summary

Since I am pathologically late on everything, I figured I should release at least a summary as I try to put the final video content together.  I plan to do a livestream as a wrap up as soon as I organize all the data.  Below is a run down of a few categories.  Let me know if I missed something and I will add more detail.

Only for Supporters
To read the rest of this article and access other paid content, you must be a supporter
Read full Article
Available on mobile and TV devices
google store google store app store app store
google store google store app tv store app tv store amazon store amazon store roku store roku store
Powered by Locals