For several years now I have been saying that I should look at hunting scopes a bit more carefully. I always get distracted, but not entirely.
Just got my hands onto the re-designed Burris Fullfield 3-12x56.
Just received the 3-12x56 Fullfield with #4 reticle and illuminated dot.
Optically, it looks quite nice. I was not sure if they would be able to pull off a 56mm lens on a scope this short at this price, but it looks like they did. It seems to be very nicely corrected.
Eye relief is pretty consistent. It looks to be a hair over 3 inches on 12x. Once I got it set up on12x, I did not have to make any adjustments to my head position at other magnifications.
On lower power, there is enough eyerelief flexibility to accommodate sitting and standing shooting positions. I do not have to crane my neck when shooting sitting or standing.
The turrets have surprisingly decent feel, but I plan to keep them covered once the scope is sighted in.
The reticle is very visible and the illuminated dot is not overly bright. There are 11 illumination settings and the lower ones are quite low. It is very unlikely to screw up your eye's night adaptation.
https://alnk.to/6mRr9rp
For the time being, I decided to set it up on the Franken Mosin, although the stock on that gun is a touch longer than I'd want for this scope (can't move the scope back easily because the objective bell interferes with the rail). As shown the rifle weighs exactly ten pounds, so it will not stress the durability of the optic with too much recoil. Still, it will beat it up a little.
My original plan was to set it up on the 300WSM Browning BLR, but there a different problem there: it would have to be mounted much higher because of the rear sight clearance, while the stock on the BLR is not intended for tall scope mounts.
The way this scope is set up, it is clearly aimed at MPBR use, with a simple #4 reticle and covered turrets. However, Burris is introducing interchangeable turrets for its Fullfield line so, in principle, I could set it up for dialing in the future. It has over 90MOA of adjustment range.
I do not have current plans to do that, but I will spend some time investigating the depth of field (it is a fixed parallax design) and tracking consistency to get an idea on whether that is a viable option.