DarkLordOfOptics
Politics • Science & Tech • Sports
Scope Mounts: Griffin SPRM
January 03, 2024

Continuing with the overview of the mounts I have on hand...

To date, I have talked abotu a good number of different single piece mounts.  I really liked Reptilia AUS and Area 419 mounts.  Badger Unimount is probably my choice if you want to be under $200.  Someone told me they are discontinued, but there are still a few out there (OpticsPlanet, Inc - 4355).  Seekins MXM and its Vortex equivalent have been very solid in my practice.  There are a couple of simple inexpensive mounts out there from Brownells and SwampFox that work surprisingly well, but I have to admit I have not tried them with precision scopes.  Going back to the higher end of things, I have a 34mm Era-tac Adjustable slope mount that will be a subejct of a future article.  I also have an M-Brace mount from ARC.  It is generally a good mount, but I naturally have a couple of reservations.  I will cover that in the future as well.  Another mount that I have not talked about a lot is Wanre Precision MSR.  I am reasonably happy with it though on balance, I think I like Reptilia a little more.

My original favourite was the Aadmount and in terms of the clamp design I think it is still the best (Seekins is somewhat similar conceptually, I think).  Unfortunately, they are not made any more.  I hope they will come back eventually.

If there are other mounts out there I should be looking at, please let me know.  Once I am done with these, I'll be ready to explore something else.

The subject of this article is Griffin's SPRM mount.   I am sure the name of the mount is not accidental.  The version I have is the one specifically intended for the S&B Ultra Short 5-20x50.  That scope does not have much of a maintube to work with and the original version had the illumination knob right in front of the eyepiece.  Normally, SPRM mount has six screws on both rings.  This version has six screws up front and four in the back because there was not enough space.  I no longer have the S&B I got the mount for, but the very short March 1.5-15x42 is back here, so I used the mildly pornographic SPRM mount with it.

The plan is to put this scope onto my 8.6Blackout Fix.  It should be a good match there.  For all the subsonic shooting I do, it would be better to have a mount with slope, but it will do in the short term.  March has 40mrad of adjsutment and a tree reticle, so it will take my subsonic 8.6 loads a bit past 500 yards.  

Eventually, I'll replace it with something lighter.  For this application, I am not hugely concnerned with accessory mounting.

The SPRM mount is, by modern standards, comparatively inexpensive at $200 for the base mount https://bit.ly/4aF7jpr

It is machined out of 6061 aluminum.  All the different cross sections seem fairly stiff.  In terms of ring half stiffness, it is not bad.  The ring gaps on two sides are offset in order to allow additional accessory mounting points.  That means on one side the screws are pointing up and on the other, they are pointing down.  It is a little bit of a pain in the ass, since there is some interference with the screws on the clamp.

It is generally a somewhat awkward mount to set up.  The picatinny clamp is a long sinle piece, which I do not like.  There are four cross screws that also serve as recoil lugs.  The clamp screws are not recessed, which is also a somewhat odd decision.  You have to be a little careful with how you tighten the clamp or you will have a wondering zero.

The accessory mounting depends on the friction between the accessory rail and the mounting area.  Two 8-40 screws hold the accessory plates in place.  It is not a great way to go.  You want interface geometry to define all the positoning, not surface friction.  There are quite a few different availabel itnerface plates.  I have the offset picatinny and RMR plates.They work well enough until they shake themselves loose.  A little sleeve-type (green?) loctite would probably help keep them in place.  In other words, I do not think it is the cleverest mounting interface in the world, but that is resolvable.  Area 419 and M-Brace use much better approaches, but cost a lot more.

Despite being fairly solid, the mount is not terribly heavy.  Still, I can shave off three ounces if I switch to the Reptilia or something like that.

If you pay attention and tighten everythign carefully and evenly (and with a torque wrench), it seems to stay zeroed.  It does not return to zero all that great in my experience and I suspect it has something to do with the geometry of the clamping bar.  Still, once set up, it stays that way.  All fasteners are T15 which makes for reasonable convenience.

I am also not crazy about six screw rings.  Unless you are preparing for some truly massive recoil, it is not clear to me what the reason behind that is.  This is not unique to Griffin, of course.

All in all, it is a serviceable mount, but not my top choice.  The appeal is that you get a mount set up for accessory mounting for comparatively less money than a lot of the other brands out there.  The accessory mounting interface, however, is a little suspect.

 

 

community logo
Join the DarkLordOfOptics Community
To read more articles like this, sign up and join my community today
3
What else you may like…
Videos
Posts
Articles
Blast From The Past: Millett ZoomDot RDS

I dug this thing up purely by accident. It has been a long time since I used it for anything, but I am thinking I should, especially as I work on a magnifier video.

MIllet's ZoomDot was a unique red dot sight that had auto brightness and variable dot size from 1MOA to 10MOA.

Early ones, like mine, were made in the US. Millett had some aspirations of selling these to the US military.

I do not think they got very far, then the company was bought by Bushnell and essentially shut down after a little bit. At some point, the manufacturing for the ZoomDot moved to China and it was not really the same.

00:05:44
Scout Scopes: Burris 2.75x20

Scout scopes are almost like a forgotten art form these days. There is an occasional discussion either on how they are the greatest thing since sliced bread because 1) THE colonel said so 2) if you do not think they are, refer to rule number 1.
Alternatively, the prevailing thought is that they are completely useless and if LPVOs existed in Jeff Cooper's time, there would never be such a thing as scout scopes.
The truth, as is usually the case, resides somewhere in the middle.
Scout scopes do have their place, but they are definitely a niche product. It is, however, an interesting niche.
Scout scope pickings are relatively slim in terms of what's on offer.
Leupold makes a 1.5-4x28 https://alnk.to/gKSibYj
Burris makes a 2-7x32 and 2.75x20
Vortex has a 2-7x32 in the Crossfire line
There are also a few out there from UTG, Aimsports, etc.

I strongly lean toward compact fixed power designs, so Burris 2.75x20 https://alnk.to/cSJCBQx is probably my favourite and is the subject of this ...

00:11:58
Integrix M1 MRAD Reticle in the 3-18x44

Wind was really making things difficult, but at least this gives you a look at the reticle.
It is a respectable design that is conceptually closer to SKMR reticles than to the ones I usually gravitate to. They also have an M2 that is, I think, a little better.
In the grand scheme of things, the M1 did not take me long to get used to and it is not giving me any real issues.
https://alnk.to/9TaI2kH

00:06:33
Integrix 3-18x44 Tracking Follow-up

I reached out to Leapers to relay the issues I found with reticle sizing and tracking in the 3-18x44 scope they sent me.

They confirmed that the scope I have here is an engineering model. They also talked to engineering and, apparently, they found the same issues I did with the mrad model and fixed them for the production run.

The MOA model (https://alnk.to/eZIJo9a) is, according to them, spot on. The issues were only present in pre-production mrad scopes.

Once they get production scopes going, I plan to re-visit them. I think the first one to become available will be the 4.5-27x model with the M2 Mrad reticle. I saw it during SHOT and I think it will be more up my alley than the M1, though the latter is still serviceable.

This is strange but once in my lifetime I felt fortunate to be not smart enogh to be in Harvard University...

Memorial Day Sales

I am beginning to see some early Memorial Day Sale emails in my inbox.
If I see anything interesting, I'll add it to this post which will be pinned to the top, rather than inundate you with incessant "it's a sale!" emails. Better keep it all in one spot.

The first one I see is from Opticsplanet. https://alnk.to/cwU58u8
They have all sorts of stuff rom Burris and Steiner discounted including the recently introduced Burris XTR PS 5.5-30x56 for $2199 https://alnk.to/d3Em4Su and the rather unusual Steiner T6Xi 3-18x56 https://alnk.to/ge7ZJBN
Eliminator 6 gets you $400 of bonus bucks to use on something else. https://alnk.to/flycPy8

Tract Optics will be running a 10% storewide sale starting Thursday with the discount code "REMEMBRANCE". While I generally like their products, the one that is really agreeing with me the most is the new 2.5-15x44 with MRAD Eagleman reticle. https://tractoptics.com/toric-uhd-30mm-2-5-15x44-ffp-illuminated-mrad-eagleman-long-range-hunting-rifle-scope/
I am sure ...

First PRS Match is behind me
High Noon at Del Norte

My first PRS match is officially behind me.  It was, I think an officially sanctioned regional PRS match at the shooting range called Del Norte about an hour from me (just east of Rio Rancho).
As I discussed previously, rather than using the rifle I originally prepared for it, I ended up having to change gears at the last moment and slapping a 5-25x56 Tangent on my daughter's 6ARC MiniFIx.  A lightweight 16" Proof barreled 6ARC is not an ideal set up for PRS competition, but, in the grand scheme of things, the rifle did hot hold me back at all.  I had a couple of weights that fit the Q-cert handguard, so I slapped them on there as well, which got the rifle to right around 12lbs.  The balance point was almost where I want it, but not quite.  In all other ways, this was a very handy rifle to shoot.  I am actually thinking of getting a couple more weights that I can stack on it (Sawtooth weights are stackable), so that I can shoot some future local matches with it.  It shoots Hornady's Black 105gr ammo very well (it also shoots 108gr ELD-M and 103gr ELD-X well, but I had a larger supply of Hornady Black ammo on hand).

It chrono'ed pretty consistently for factory ammo.  Here are the measurements for a 20 shot group.

If I were to take out the fastest shot, SD drops down to 8fps.  

In terms of wind performance, it is a 5mph rifle, so slightly better than the 308 ammo I was going to use originally, but not as good as the 6.5CM that was my intended match rifle for this year (we make plans, but then life happens).

I do have to admit that I really enjoyed shooting the match with the MiniFix.  So much so, that I am seriously thinking of building another one for myself, since this rifle is technically my daughter's.

The closest shot we had was a bit over a couple of hundred yards.  The furthest was around 1150.  That was a bit challenging for the 16" barreled 6ARC, especially since the terrain there is tricky and wind is doing strange things.  Morning was relatively quiet wind-wise, but then the wind becamse gusty with changing directions.

It was a one day match with about 30 shooters (six squads) and ten stages.  The 17 year old kid who won the match was in my squad with his dad.  Apparently he is on the US team, so it should not be surrpising that he won.  He was very good.

Overall level of the shooters in the match was quite good.  I really was not sure what to expect.  Somewhat paradoxically, the only matches that I have shot in so far are the much larger two day NRL Hunter matches.  In those, I am just out of the bottom third in terms of skill level.  In this match, it was pretty much in the same spot, I think.  

The terrain was a little bit like Cameo, I think (I have been there, but not shot there), with some angle changes and sufficient vegetation to make getting on target occasionally troublesome. 

Only for Supporters
To read the rest of this article and access other paid content, you must be a supporter
Read full Article
post photo preview
Updates
Getting back on the horse, little by little

My original plan was to do a livestream on Thursday of this week, but I think I'll push it out to next week.  A few days at home is doing wonders for my recovery, but my voice is still not quite there.  I do not think any of you are looking to listen to me cough for two hours straight.

Also, I am going to try to shoot that local PRS match this coming Saturday, so doign a livestream next week after the match is likely to be more productive.  It is my first one, so I fully expect that I will screw it all up.  It should be a good learning experience.  I do not have a dedicated PRS rifle and I am not looking to set one up jsut yet.  If I like it, I'll put something together, but as far as competition goes, my focus is really on UKD matches like NRL Hunter, Competition Dynamics, etc.  My 6.5CM is not back yet, so I'll just shoot it with my 308 FIx.  It is not ideal, but it will do just fine for my purposes.  I am in no danger of winning anything either way and this will stress my ability to read wind.  A secondary purpse here is that I am not 100% certain what rifle I will take on a mule deer hunt with later this year, but it will be either something new to test or this 308.  Now that I think about it, the 308 is going with me regardless either as a primary rifle or as backup.  The rifle shoots, so if I miss, I know it is on me.

For the match, I have Burris XTR PS 5.5-30x56 scope on the 308 Fix.  I think the way they did the heads up display in these is a meaningful improvement over conventional riflescopes.

https://alnk.to/d3EjPHC or https://alnk.to/8iVRlGN

Optically, I think XTR Pro is a little better, but the EO integration in the XTR PS is, I think, in advantage.

In parallel, I am looking at the replacement AAC ammo (they replaced the faulty ammo and I have chrono results on it) and testing the optics of the 40mm scopes in parallel.

 

Only for Supporters
To read the rest of this article and access other paid content, you must be a supporter
Read full Article
A first look at Steiner H6Xi 2-12x42
MPVOs are finally getting some attention

Here are some initial thoughts on the Steiner H6Xi 2-12x42.

I finally had a chance to shoot with it both supported and unsupported, which is an important part of figuring out how usable an optic is.

I found what looks to be more accurate specifications in the manual that came with the H6Xi, so the spec table is now updated:

To re-iterate from an earlier post, Eurooptic is selling the H6Xi 2-12x42 for $1350 and at that price, it is easily the best deal going in this category: https://alnk.to/90ALO3C

Only for Supporters
To read the rest of this article and access other paid content, you must be a supporter
Read full Article
Available on mobile and TV devices
google store google store app store app store
google store google store app tv store app tv store amazon store amazon store roku store roku store
Powered by Locals