DarkLordOfOptics
Politics • Science & Tech • Sports
GRS Bipod
Not a lightweight
October 15, 2023
post photo preview

One of the oddly positive sideeffects of having COVID again is that staying away from people is somewhat encouraged.  That gives me an opportunity to wrap up with a few things that I have been meaning to write for a while.  As is always the case, the plan is to do a video later as well, but writing is faster, so at least I can get some information to you.

With my studio in complete disarray after the flood and the wind making sound recording tricky outdoors, making videos is a little more involved than it used to be.

Since I have been preparing for hunting season for a little while, my focus has been, to a significant degree, on lightweight gear.  However, it is sometimes nice to take a detour and focus on simply looking for precision.  In one of the recent livestreams I joined (by SlavGuns), the subject of intro-to-precision optics came up and I opined that if I were starting out with a basic rpecision setup, I'd be looking at Vortex Venom or Element Helix FFP.  I'll talk about the Venom separately, but as I was talking I realized that I still ahve the Venom here, so I dug it up and decided to go do some shooting.  It was zeroed a couple of years ago and I simply wanted to see if it has remained zeroed.  The rifle it is on ended up crash landing on the concrete floor of my garage as I was shuffling things around a couple of times.  I was not particularly concerned about the scope shifting zero, but spring loaded QD mounts are notorious for this kind of stuff.  They really do not like side impact.  Well, I am happy to report that the Burris XTR one piece mount stayed zeroed just fine and once I pulled the rifle out, I decided to give you an update on the GRS bipod I was shooting off of.

Before you read further, this bipod is neither cheap nor light.  Together with the picatinny spigot adapter it tips the scale at a bit over two pounds and costs a bit over $500.

https://shrsl.com/49l1s

https://bit.ly/3Qiklkw and https://bit.ly/3rRsxik

You can also by the spigot only if you have GRS Bifrost stock. https://bit.ly/46uq7Fv

I suppose you can say that price and weight are negatives for this bipod.  The other negative is that on some picatinny rails, it will not work.  You need to have crosslots go all the way to the fron of the rail, so on my Fix, for example, I can not use this bipod in the top mounted configuration. 

It works fine if I reconfigure the adaptor to mount on the bottom of the handguard.

Also, while you can adjust for tilt, the bipod does not have a panning feature.

That's pretty much a wrap for the negatives. 

Let's move onto the positives, then.

In the top mounted configuration (which is why I got it).  This bipod is stupid sturdy.  The geometry helps (top mounted bipods are generally sturdier).

The rifle it is currently on is not a particularly heavy kciker, but I have tried it on a few.  It is seriously sturdy.  Everything in this bipod is either aluminum or steel.

The feet are reversible with a flat smooth surface or clawed feet.  I shoot of of a concrete bench fairly regularly, so I wrapped the smooth side with a little electrical tape to avoid metal on concerete contact.

So far, tripod feet have been very secure on any surface I have tried to date.  The legs extend and there are notches that help with granularity.

Splay angle is not adjustable, but forward angle is.  You can set the legs at 90, 68 and 34 degrees, in addition to fully folded parallel to the barrel.

In every position, the legs are extremely secure.  I've had the rifle index on the barricade using the legs (one or both), load it against a variety of surfaces and it was always sturdy and secure.

Beyond this, I really do not know what else to add.  When something is wrong, I can always offer a lto of commentary.  However, when the bloody thing just works no matter what I throw at it, there really isn't much I can say that does not sound like a sales pitch.  

It is not a bipod I would take hunting simply because of weight.  However, I have a long running heavy precision rifle project that will eventually get completed.  The GRS bipod is going to go on that.  Until then, it will stay on the large frame AR you see in these pictures.

community logo
Join the DarkLordOfOptics Community
To read more articles like this, sign up and join my community today
17
What else you may like…
Videos
Posts
Articles
Burris XTR PS HUD

Here is a better look at the Heads Up Display (HUD) in Burris' XTR PS scopes. In this case, I am looking through a 3.3-18x50, but the HUD is the same in both models.
https://alnk.to/4qN7csi

AFF10 code gets you extra 10% off on just about anything on Opticsplanet website starting at midnight tonight.

The more time I spent with HUD equipped scopes, the more I think that this is a significant step forward.

If they ever get a WMLRF to connect to this thing, it will be amazing, but even as is, I think it is a meaningful advantage.

00:09:18
Through the scope view at the STR-MIL reticle in Steiner H6Xi 2-12x42

Here is a quick look at the reticle through the scope. As I watch the video, it looks thinner in the picture than it does in real life. I have a suspicion that those relatively dense 0.2mrad hashmarks make the primary stadia stand out more than they would otherwise.

One one hand, I'd prefer for this reticle to be a little bolder or have some high visibility features.

On the other hand, it is pretty usable as is and the scope is quickly becoming one of my favourite MPVO designs currently on the market.

Next step will be to get it back on the gun, mount a piggy-backed RDS and do some shooting from 10 yards to 800 yards.
https://alnk.to/9bvy9a9

00:04:19
Zeiss SFL 12x50

Zeiss makes quite a few binoculars. Aside from an occasional misstep (Terra...), most of them are pretty good.
As with any product line, some models come together better than others.
Zeiss' SFL product line is something I looked at briefly, but never dwelled on it too much. They seemed like nice binoculars, but I never really looked at them carefully.
Imagine my surprise when the folks at Zeiss reached out and asked if I want to take a look at their new 12x50 version of the SFL.
They know I live out west, so they must have heard I have the space to really work out where the limits of a 12x50 binocular are.
Given that sending me a product to look at involves certain risks (until I am pretty much done with the review, I ignore marketing literature and any and all attempts from any company to tell me what to say), I figured that they either decided to live dangerously or that they are pretty damn confident of how good the product is.
I do not know for sure which one it is, but the ...

00:11:45
16 hours ago

Hey ILya, are you doing OK? Read on the Hide that you were pretty worn out and trying to get over an illness. Hope you're feeling better.

Burris Fullfield 3-12x56

For several years now I have been saying that I should look at hunting scopes a bit more carefully. I always get distracted, but not entirely.

Just got my hands onto the re-designed Burris Fullfield 3-12x56.

Just received the 3-12x56 Fullfield with #4 reticle and illuminated dot.

Optically, it looks quite nice. I was not sure if they would be able to pull off a 56mm lens on a scope this short at this price, but it looks like they did. It seems to be very nicely corrected.

Eye relief is pretty consistent. It looks to be a hair over 3 inches on 12x. Once I got it set up on12x, I did not have to make any adjustments to my head position at other magnifications.

On lower power, there is enough eyerelief flexibility to accommodate sitting and standing shooting positions. I do not have to crane my neck when shooting sitting or standing.

The turrets have surprisingly decent feel, but I plan to keep them covered once the scope is sighted in.

The reticle is very visible and the illuminated ...

Do you remember what the turrets felt like on your Zeiss LRP S5? Did your elevation and windage turrets feel similar? Mine are quite different.

The elevation turret on mine doesn't feel nearly as good as the windage turret.

The windage turret is very tactile and audible, you can feel each click thunk into place.

My elevation turret is barely audible and the clicks aren't nearly as positive as the windage. It's easy to skip past click detent in the elevation turret, this not a problem on the windage turret.

I also posted this question on snipershide as "Gil P."

A first look at Steiner H6Xi 2-12x42
MPVOs are finally getting some attention

Here are some initial thoughts on the Steiner H6Xi 2-12x42.

I finally had a chance to shoot with it both supported and unsupported, which is an important part of figuring out how usable an optic is.

I found what looks to be more accurate specifications in the manual that came with the H6Xi, so the spec table is now updated:

To re-iterate from an earlier post, Eurooptic is selling the H6Xi 2-12x42 for $1350 and at that price, it is easily the best deal going in this category: https://alnk.to/90ALO3C

Only for Supporters
To read the rest of this article and access other paid content, you must be a supporter
Read full Article
AAC Ammo: Trouble In Paradise
I think this is the almighty telling me to start reloading again

Well, since I was running a little low on AAC Precision 175gr 308 ammo, I ordered another batch.  This one came from a different lot than the batch I had before.

Only for Supporters
To read the rest of this article and access other paid content, you must be a supporter
Read full Article
Deep into the 40s
42-44mm Riflescopes

I have about 13 months left to be in my 40s, so I figured this is my last opportunity to get cheeky with this project title.

As I mentioned during last week's livestream, I am kicking off a large review encompassing seven different riflescopes that really share only one thing in common: their objectives are in the 42-44mm range.

Here is a comparison table of the specs for the scopes I have on hand.  Note that the Swampfox Warhawk 2-10x44 is not going to be in this comparison very much.  I'll do a separate video on it.  The biggest reason for that is simply that this spec table is becoming too long and comparing so many scopes all at the same time is exponentially more difficult.  I was going to take out either the Warhawk or the Blackhound since neither of them have a zero stop, so I flipped a coin and Blackhound got to stay.  I will go over it a little bit below the table.

I did not set out to have this particular line-up in mind, but I like this riflescope type, so I ended up with all of these on hand.  

Some of these scopes I have lready reviewed quite thoroughly, namely the Blackhound and Tract.

If you look at the specs carefully, you'll see that these range from true ultrashort designs (GPO and March), to "kinda short" designs (Leapers, Delta, Leupold and Blackhound) to a conventionally sized Tract Toric.  Some of these lean toward the MPVO category.  Some are unabashedly aimed at the Crossover market.  Tract stands alone as a relatively conventional hunting scope, except configured very nicely to do everything as necessary.  Another scope that would fit this category very well also that is no longer here is Vortex Strike Eagle 3-18x44.  I might reference it occasionally.

I have a good amount of mileage with all of these, although I have not yet released a final review on every design.  Still, I can offer some initial thoughts in order of ascending price.

Only for Supporters
To read the rest of this article and access other paid content, you must be a supporter
Read full Article
Available on mobile and TV devices
google store google store app store app store
google store google store app tv store app tv store amazon store amazon store roku store roku store
Powered by Locals