DarkLordOfOptics
Politics • Science & Tech • Sports
Delta Stryker HD 3.5-21x44
Seeing light at the end of a tunnel
October 08, 2023
post photo preview

As I write this, I was supposed to be out on a pronghorn hunt.

Naturally, we make plans and then life happens.  A couple of days before I was supposed to leave, kids brought some sort of a virus home from school.  FIrst they got sick, then my wife got sick, then I got sick.  What was supposed to be a three day hunt will be a one day hunt tomorrow.  I am feeling better today, but get winded from going up the stairs.  Hopefully, I will be in better condition tomorrow.

In the meantime, the insanity in Israel kicked off, but there is nothing I can do about that aside from quietly cursing at my computer screen.

I figured I need a distraction from all that and a brief first look at the new Delta Stryker 3.5-21x44 is going to be just that.

I set it up and sighted it in on my Fix rifle as a backup scope for the pronghorn hunt.  Given that It is turning out to be a one day hunt, I doubt I will need it, but I did end up doing a good amount of shooting with it as general training and preparation.  I have not yet taken it past 530 yards, but will in the next few weeks.

Just like the new 1-10x28 from Delta I have talked about a week ago, it is a new design and this scope is from a first production batch.  They should be making it to our shores shortly.  I just checked and I do not think Annex Defense have it listed on their website yet, but I am sure they will.  I think it should retail right around $2k, but we'll see how that works out.

The scope that I have is equipped with the new DPRC-1 reticle.

Here are some basic specs:

For the metrically challenged, that's 28.4 ounces of weight and 12.4 inches of length.  This scope fits rather squarely into my definition of a crossover.  Apparent FOV is 22.8 degrees which is pretty good.

Before I move on, I have a philisophical question: if you use a scope to look down a tunnel, does that mean it is tunneling?

There is no other kind of tunneling with this scope, which is a good thing.  It turned out to be pretty comfortabel to get behind.  As I was shooting with it, I could not help but think about Leupold's Mark 5HD 3.6-18x44.  The new Delta is a direct competitor and Leupold should be worried.

On paper, Delta is two ounces heavier and hald an inch longer.  In every other way possible, it is a better scope: closer focus, more adjustment range, broader magnification range, wider FOV.

Reticles are in the eye of a beholder, but until Leupodl puts an illuminated PR2 into the Mark 5, there is no modern tree reticle available for the Leupold.

Now, as a general disclaimer, the Delta reticle is not my design, but again, I had a chance to offer my suggestions.  As is usually the case, they adopted some of them and discarded others.  Overall, I like DPRC-1.  It looks busier on paper than it does when shooting with it.  In some ways, it is a fusion of a conventional tree reticle with an abbreviated grid reticle like Schmidt's GR2ID that I also like.  With only the main studia illuminated, it is a good general purpose design for people who like tree reticles.  You get prominent 0.5mrad holds and as you go up in magnification you also have 0.1 and 0.2 mrad holds.  Usign 0.5 mrad hodls quickly is very natural.  Going finer that under time pressure looks doable, but will require a little practice.  The design is a little different from what is commonly offered now, but it looks very viable from my limited use so far.

For people who do not like tree reticles, I think it will eventually also be availabel with Delta's DLR-1 reticle (mil-hash design without a tree) that I also happened to like.

Turret configuraiton is a little different with the Delta.  WIndage turret is capped, while the elevation turret is not locking, but has zerostop.

At first blush, optical quality looks very good to me.  Now, I was looking at next to a 3-18x50 S&B and I will honestly tell you that optically S&B is a better scope in terms of image quality.  On the other hand, switching back and forth, I did not feel underscoped with the Delta.  There were no obvious optical issues that jumped out at me.

Mechanically, the turrets seemed to track as they should.  I did not harass them too much yet, but at moderate ranges where I was shooting, they dialed true.

As a brief aside, Badger's Unimount, when using a torque wrench remounted to well within my ability to shoot.  If Badger is indeed discontinuing these, maybe I should pick another one up while I can still fidn them under $200.  Opticplanet seems to have a few in stock: https://shrsl.com/482av

It is not as slick looking as some of the more modern designs like Reptilia, but it is rock solid and works wellf or under $200.

Going back to the optic, I am pretty pleased with what I see so far.  The magnification range is very appropriate for my needs.  It is not ideal behind a clip-on, but with 6.3degree FOV on 3.5x, it is perfectly workable.  Image quality looks very respectable so far.  The scope is not overy heavy for what it is and quite compact.  There is enough adjustment range for everything up to and including rimfire ELR.  45 mrad is a lot of adjustment.

Turret feel is reasonable.  It is no Tangent, but I did not miss any clicks either.  Turret reset is toolless, but you need a small allen wrench to reset the zerostop.

The new eyepiece of the 1-10x28 and 3.5-21x44 is a reasonable step up over the older Stryker models: FOV is wider and it is well corrected.

My 308 Fix is, in many ways, a perfect example of a true crossover rifle.  I can do everything with it from hunting to long rane precision to night hunting to you name it and the new Stryker is one of the best matched scopes for it I have seen to date.

 

 

 

community logo
Join the DarkLordOfOptics Community
To read more articles like this, sign up and join my community today
16
What else you may like…
Videos
Posts
Articles
PA GLx 2x Final Resting Place

Here is a final, likely, wrap up of where I think the GLx 2x from Primary Arms belongs.
It is likely the best general purpose optic for AKs and ARs I have seen in a while for shooting inside of $200. Definitely the best for the money and per ounce.
Now, when I say "inside of 200 yards" I do not mean trying to shave a hair of of a mosquito's left testicle. Assume shooting at typical subjects the size of a human torso, or a hog's vital zone.
Most of the time, I have the GLx sitting on a 300BLK pistol. I used it to teach one of my kids to shoot and it was a very easy and forgiving optic to use for a 7 year old. It is equally easy and forgiving for adults as well. It is just that easy to get behind and moderate magnification helps with the ease of use tremendously.
Now that pistol braces are verbotten, the GLx ended up on a 7.62x39 AK (a somewhat tricked out WASR-10) and I think it is going to stay there permanently.
https://alnk.to/ge40PLW
The ACSS reticle on this one is done just ...

00:12:30
SwampFox Sentinel red dot sight

This one is a very simple review:
-it is small
-it is robust
-it works they way it is supposed to
-it does not cost a huge amount of money
-the Ironside shield is a good idea
-RMSc footprint is a good idea

I messed up on price in the video. It is about $50 less than I thought at Brownells: https://alnk.to/a41u5D4

Ironsides stainless steel shield adds $40 to it: https://alnk.to/hDo4gJf

00:07:04
Kicking things off with 5x prismatics: SwampFox and Vortex

I plan to examine a few more prismatics as I go along, but here is the first installment that discusses SwampFox Saber 5x36 and Vortex Spitfire Gen2 5x25.
The interesting part is how little they have in common and how they do compromises differently.
Saber used a large CR123 battery, for example, but the housing gets in the way of a conventional offset red dots or irons should you choose to use one. However, the red dot mounted on the body of the sight, I think, works better.
Vortex, unlike the SwampFox comes with two different mount heights, so I was able to use it on both AK and AR platforms. It is more at home on a lightweight AR though.
The approaches to FOV, reticles, packaging and mounting are very different, which makes it all interesting to me.
The next video on 5x prismatics will talk about the Element Immersive 5x30 and Primary Arms SLx 5x Micro in some length.

00:24:28
May 16, 2024

Hey ILya, for a short range 16" 308 AR, would you go with a LPVO or something like the Helos 2-12x and an offset red dot?

May 15, 2024

Meopta Meostar R and/or Optika5?

I am building up a backup and/or “loaner” all-round hunting rifle… the basis of this build is a gently used Sauer 100 in .308 that I procured for a deal.

I am considering a basic 2-10x40ish or 3-15 ish, prefer quality and reliability over other considerations…

The Meoptas have peaked my interest (again).

The MeoSport R 3-15x50 seems to have a lot of features (PA/illum) and dialable (locking, no stop) turrets for a reasonable price. https://alnk.to/fHlyBbE

The Optika 5 in 2-10x42 or 3-15x44 also seem to have good (yet few) reviews. I would prefer PA, but that is not universal across the line.
https://alnk.to/e76JLQ0

Some inherent tradeoffs - weight is a bit higher than others, and the MeoSport allegedly has slightly degraded low-light performance vs the Optika5. All claim to be “assembled” in the Czech Republic.

I would let one any feedback or comparison on these scopes… or other options/brands worth considering ($600 ish).

Many thanks!

Shooting Tripod question:
One OEM guy was visiting my office yesterday and they were talking about OEM tripod products for Sig, assuming trying to compete against Athlon's in the more budget price range.
I was told that the one made for rifle shooting has a CF tube diameter of 46mm which I thought was really bigger than usual.
What is the minimal tube diameter for shooting a tripod in your opinion?

Element Immersive 5x30 Reticle Dimensions

The question of the reticle dimensions comes up occasionally.  I have shared them here and there, but figured I should post them in a more searchable post.  The scopes are available from Opticsplanet https://shrsl.com/4j1i0 and a few other places here and there https://alnk.to/3ngwfAT

There are two reticles LPR-1D MRAD and LPR-1D BDC

The mrad reticle is more of a general purpose design.

The BDC/MOA reticle is calibrated for 62gr SS109 ammo out of a 16" barrel and 200 yard zero.  It can be adapted to other loads with small modifications in zeroing process.

If you need help figuring out how either reticles works with a particular ammo/load you are working with, let me know.

They are designed to look veyr similar to each other when you have to quickly acquire the target: horseshoe is of very similar size, as is the primary aiming point.

If you have a chance to slow down and aim varefully, there are wind and lead holds in both designs.

I did a livestream on these when production samples first showed up here:

 

Read full Article
Non-magnifying Optic Parallax Error
A Dose Of Reality

The discussion of how much parallax red dot sights have pops up all the time.  It gets very emotionally charged.  Measured parallax error gets converted to MOA.  Everyone knows that MOA is right around one inch.  Large parallax error in MOA at close distances looks like a huge problem.
What is frequently forgotten is that 1MOA is exactly one inch at only one distance: ~95.5 yards.
At closer distances, it is a lot less than an inch.


Here is a table that calculates linear parallax error at different distances for a given angular error in MOA:

One of the problems is that most manufacturers of red dot sights claim their sights are parallax free.  What they really mean by that is that they are parallax free in the sweetspot (some center region) at one particular distance (usually 40 or 50 yards).

EoTech, apparently and to their credit, actually posted some numbers that are about right based on what I have seen:

The only othe rhologrpahic sight on the market, Vortex UH-1 is slightly better than that at the edges.  However, with both EOTech and UH-1, I can only see parallax error fairly close to the edges.  Most of the center portion of the window has sufficiently low parallax error that the natural dispersion of my shooting completely conceals it.  

Suppose you are doing a CQB drill and go really fast.  You end up taking a shot where the aiming point is somewhere toward the edge of the window of the sight.  Worst case, you are picking up about 10MOA of error from the optic.  That is 1.5 inches at 10 yards.  Does that constitue a problem for a CQB scenario?  Not in the slightest.  The only time I can think of when it might be an issue is a hostage-type drill, but every time I have done it, there was enough time to roughly center the aiming point in the sigh tpicture.  That brings parallax error down to zilch and you get to concentrate on dealign with gun wobble, accelerated heart rate and general stress (and that assumes noone is shooting back at you).

As the distances increase, so does the magnitude of linear parallax error, assumign a fairly constant angular error.  However, I am rapidly getting past the point where I should be taking shots at anything much beyond two hundred yards without magnification (I will be hunting deer with an iron sight muzzleloader in the fall, so I will test this out in preparation).

If I am shooting at something 100+ yards away, chances are I will have an extra second to center the aiming point.

Now, none of this means that we should not check for parallax with our holographics and red dot sights.  However, what I care about the most is the size of the sweetspot: the center area of the sight picture where parallax is negligible.  As long as it is not too small, I do not get too hung up on the parallax performance at the edges.

Read full Article
HET8: Top Level Summary

Since I am pathologically late on everything, I figured I should release at least a summary as I try to put the final video content together.  I plan to do a livestream as a wrap up as soon as I organize all the data.  Below is a run down of a few categories.  Let me know if I missed something and I will add more detail.

Only for Supporters
To read the rest of this article and access other paid content, you must be a supporter
Read full Article
Available on mobile and TV devices
google store google store app store app store
google store google store app tv store app tv store amazon store amazon store roku store roku store
Powered by Locals