DarkLordOfOptics
Politics • Science & Tech • Sports
Apex Summit Pro 12x50 Binocular
Binocular with a reticle: long overdue
October 01, 2023

12x is quite a lot of binocular magnification.  Well, it is for me.  My normal go to binocular is a 10x50 since I moved to New Mexico and started hunting out here.  Historically, it was a 8x42.  However, when distances open up, you need magnification.  I have an antelope hunt in a week, which is a perfect opportunity to work out a nice pair of high magnification binoculars.  

I have had the Summit Pro 12x50 binocular from Apex for a little while now (first saw it SHOT) and, up to now, I have mostly used it at the range.  When I first saw this thing at SHOT, I talked to the gentleman behidn Apex Optics and quietly advised him that he should charge more for these than he was planning to.  Looking at the price, I was a little concerned that people will underappreciate how nice this thing really is. 

He did not listen to me and the price for the version I have is sitting at $850.  If the one I have is a representative sample of how the rest of them are, it is a very good deal.

https://apexoptics.co/summit-ed/

I have not made a detailed study of all available 12x binoculars on the market, but I have seen a good number.  Like with most high magnification optics, I have not seen an inexpensive one (under $500) worth buying.  With binoculars, since aside from the normal considerations, the alignment between two barrels is exceedingly critical, I am even more leery of budget options because I have had plenty of bad experiences with budget binocualrs staying properly collimated and with the focusing in both barrels remaining identical.  The Summit Pro, so far, has stayed nicely consistent.

Also, rather importantly, with higher magnification optics, I really prefer to have a ranging reticle.  There are two reasons for this.  One is that it is very helpful when spotting shots.  Another is that ranging with a reticle is a perishable skill.  It is much easier to grab a binocular and go practice range estimation than do so with a riflescope on a rifle.

Apex' Summit Pro combines a good quality Japanese 12x50 binocular with a reticle for well under $1k.  

The reticle in a binocular is a bit of a different proposition than a reticle in a riflescope.  In a binocular, I want it to be there when I need it, but out of the way when I am just looking at things.  Apex' take on a binocular reticle, TR2, is what we call "just right" in terms of sizing and line thicknesses.

It gives me 0.2mrad hashes, so the basic look and ranging process is very similar to how I would go about it with a riflescope.  The reticle is fairly thin, which fits the application well.

Since the orientation of binocular barrels changes when you adjsut interpuplarry distance, reticle orientation also changes.   To mitigate that, the left barrel that contains the reticle, has an adjustment to rotate it.  If memory serves me right, Kenko (a prominent Japanese OEM) had a patent on that, so I suspect they are the ones building it for Apex.  

The right barrel has the eye-focus adjustment.  It is non-locking, but has enough friction to stay in place.  

The center focusing knob looks to be well calibrated.  There appears to be a slight amount of hysterisis, but if I was not looking for it, I would never find it.

At 32 ounces, the binocular is a little lighter than I would typically want in a high magnification optic, but that is a good thing if you have to hike with it.  It is well balanced and my hands naturally settle in a  spot where the focus knob is right under my index finger.  That's probably individual though.

Optically, it looks like a very good optic, especially for the money.  12x Razor UHD is better.  So is 12x Leica Ultravid.  Both of these are a lot mroe expensive though.

The most direct competitor price-wise is probably Leupold BX-5.  I have not spent a ton of time with it, but if my recollection is accurate, it is pretty close, but Apex has a reticle.

I have some mileage with Vortex 12x binoculars, of which I have seen three: Viper, Razor HD and Razor UHD.  In terms of pure image quality, the Summit Pro is somewhere between Viper and Razor HD, but closer to the Razor.

It has a little less FOV than Razor HD and I think Razor has a large sweetspot.  However Summit Pro looks to have a slight edge in center field performance.

FOV of the Summit Pro is about 5% narrower than the Razor.  The difference is not huge, but I can see it.  Apparent FOV is right around 62 degrees for the Apex, which is appropriate for a fairly compact 12x50 bino.  Razor is about 65degrees AFOV.

There is some CA on high contrast objects (mostly purple), but it was very difficult to capture it with a camera.  I'l make a few more attempts.  The objectives utilize ED lenses, so good CA performance is not surprising.

Depth of Field did not seem anythign out of the ordinary.  It was neither unusually shallow, nor unusually deep.

Contrast and color rendering are very natural.  Razor UHD has punchier colors in comparison.

Flare looked to be well controlled.  I could induce some veling flare with particularly obnoxious conditions on an open plain, but overall this was very good performance.

I have spent a lot of time with these during the dusk and dawn, as well as in good light.  However, I did not really do much evaluation when it is pitch black.  That is not how I use them, but I plan to do that for a little bit before I shoot the final video.  For the most part, I use those conditons to look for ghost images.

The interpupillary distance adjustment range was sufficient for my somewhat substantial mug and for my 10 year old son.  We'll call it flexible enough, but it is not intended as a kids binocular.

When we were out scouting, he was using my 6.5x32 Kowa with much more ease.  For what it's worth, that little Kowa has become my absolute go to general purpose binocular.  https://bit.ly/3J4XjcU  There is something spectacular about a very wide FOV of a moderate power bino. 

Still, for the open plains where we were, a 12x bino on a tripod was definitely the right tool for the job.  Summit Pro is compatible with all the normal tripod adapters.  In this picture, I am using a Vortex Pro binocualr adapter on a Spartan Precision Ascent Gen2 tripod  https://amzn.to/3rAU0Vk  It is not the best tripod for the money.  It is probably not the best starter tripod for people new to this.  However, if I am not out testing something, given a choice, this is the tripod that heads to the field with me.

I'll be useing the Summit Pro 12x50 binocular on a pronghorn hunt next week.  Given my skill level and luck, chances are I will not even see a pronghorn, but I will spend three solid days glassing.  I'll let you know how it goes.  So far, Summit Pro has been good in not inducing excessive fatigure, which is a promising sign.

In the meantime, I am exceedingly pleased with the Summit Pro.  It offers very good optomechancial performance for the money and a reticle that definitely pushes it up a notch against the competition in my view.

community logo
Join the DarkLordOfOptics Community
To read more articles like this, sign up and join my community today
15
What else you may like…
Videos
Posts
Articles
Blast From The Past: Millett ZoomDot RDS

I dug this thing up purely by accident. It has been a long time since I used it for anything, but I am thinking I should, especially as I work on a magnifier video.

MIllet's ZoomDot was a unique red dot sight that had auto brightness and variable dot size from 1MOA to 10MOA.

Early ones, like mine, were made in the US. Millett had some aspirations of selling these to the US military.

I do not think they got very far, then the company was bought by Bushnell and essentially shut down after a little bit. At some point, the manufacturing for the ZoomDot moved to China and it was not really the same.

00:05:44
Scout Scopes: Burris 2.75x20

Scout scopes are almost like a forgotten art form these days. There is an occasional discussion either on how they are the greatest thing since sliced bread because 1) THE colonel said so 2) if you do not think they are, refer to rule number 1.
Alternatively, the prevailing thought is that they are completely useless and if LPVOs existed in Jeff Cooper's time, there would never be such a thing as scout scopes.
The truth, as is usually the case, resides somewhere in the middle.
Scout scopes do have their place, but they are definitely a niche product. It is, however, an interesting niche.
Scout scope pickings are relatively slim in terms of what's on offer.
Leupold makes a 1.5-4x28 https://alnk.to/gKSibYj
Burris makes a 2-7x32 and 2.75x20
Vortex has a 2-7x32 in the Crossfire line
There are also a few out there from UTG, Aimsports, etc.

I strongly lean toward compact fixed power designs, so Burris 2.75x20 https://alnk.to/cSJCBQx is probably my favourite and is the subject of this ...

00:11:58
Integrix M1 MRAD Reticle in the 3-18x44

Wind was really making things difficult, but at least this gives you a look at the reticle.
It is a respectable design that is conceptually closer to SKMR reticles than to the ones I usually gravitate to. They also have an M2 that is, I think, a little better.
In the grand scheme of things, the M1 did not take me long to get used to and it is not giving me any real issues.
https://alnk.to/9TaI2kH

00:06:33
Updating the recommendations

Last week, I started thinking through and updating my scope recommendations.

The livestream last Thursday was largely focused on that and on the "only one" idea.

I started on the high end of the precision world and only made it down to about mid-range before I ran out of time.

This coming Thursday, I will continue with that and talk about precision oriented and tactical riflescopes from ~$1500 and downward from there.

I will also explore the "only one" idea with some budget limitations in mind.

In parallel, I started looking at the written recommendations I have and updating those as I go along.

While the livestream discussion gravitates into some mix of my specific recommendations and overall coverage of what's out there, the written down portion is a lot more narrowly focused to just a few options that I will comfortable endorsing.

Riflescopes "no price limit" section has been updated: https://opticsthoughts.com/?page_id=94

Binoculars "price no object" section is up to speed ...

A little more spring cleaning

Let's open this up to general public.

As I am looking through all the stuff in the safe, I found Delta Javelin 4.5-30x56 with SMR-1 reticle that has mostly been collecting dust.

I wrapped up my review of it a little while back:

It has been sorta my yardstick on high end Chinese-made scopes and now that I am done with the review of the Javelin and DNT's The One, it will likely just go back in the safe and collect dust for two more years.

Riflescopes should be used and since my safe is beginning to look like a hoarder's paradise... well, you get my drift.

Delta does not have enough of a following in the US. They do make very nice scopes and they should be out in the field, rather than collecting dust.

If I had been involved with the reticle, I would have kept it, but this reticle design was done for them by someone else. It is a competent design overall.

I have a tradition that if I am involved with the design of any aspect of the scope, it...

post photo preview
Riflescope Mount recommendations

We have had enough discussions on riflescope mounts that I figured I should have at least a small number of the ones I recommend summarized among the riflescope recommendations.
There is a huge number of mounts out there with many very serviceable ones.
This will be more along the lines of the ones that I actually use, rather than an exhaustive list of the good ones.
https://opticsthoughts.com/?page_id=3282

A morning with a chronograph

When I tell people that I am using Hornady's factory ammo for matches, I get occasionally surprised looks.  Occasionally.  Most of the time, I get fairly condescending looks from handloaders who would not let a factory round pollute the chambers of their precision rifles if their lives depended on it.

To be fair, if I had the time, I might be reloading as well.  I might be able to do better than modern factory ammo, but the truth is that I am not a quarter MOA shooter, so a lot of that would be lost on me.  The UKD matches I fidn most interesting can be done by a competent shooter with a 1MOA gun.  I am working on that first part.  I reload when I have to, but if I can get factory ammo that's not outrageously expensive and that shoots well, I will go with that every time.

I looked around and realized that I have about 600 rounds of Hornady 147gr 6.5CM factory ammo from two lots.  400 rounds from one that I will use during the match later this month.  The remainder I will likely use up practicing prior to that.

I woke up early and snuck out to the range while my family was still asleep earlier today.

I set up in the 100 yard tunnel we have.  I took my four shots to zero with the lot I plan to use for the match.  Then I fired a six shot ~0.7MOA group.  That's accurate enough for my purposes.

Here are the chronograph results:

It is slow, but accurate and consistent.

Then I shot a five round group of Hornady 147gr ammo from the other lot.

Both of those lots are not too shabby for factory ammo.  POI was within 0.2mrad between the two lots, all laterally.  

 

I had some other ammo on hand, so I fired two five shot groups with Berger 144gr hybrid target ammo and Sako TRG 136gr.

Here is what I got for five rounds of Berger:

That's not a ton of statistics, but it is a data point.  The group was ~1.1MOA

 

Here the data for the Sako TRG 136gr ammo:

This ammo showed some mild pressure signs, but not too significant.  

Again, this is not a ton of data, but Hornady is looking pretty decent here.

I'll repeat the zero retention and consistency tests a couple more times between now and June 18th when we head to Wyoming.

I might pick up a couple more boxes of Hornady 147gr from a different lot to get some more data.

More to come.

 

Read full Article
First PRS Match is behind me
High Noon at Del Norte

My first PRS match is officially behind me.  It was, I think an officially sanctioned regional PRS match at the shooting range called Del Norte about an hour from me (just east of Rio Rancho).
As I discussed previously, rather than using the rifle I originally prepared for it, I ended up having to change gears at the last moment and slapping a 5-25x56 Tangent on my daughter's 6ARC MiniFIx.  A lightweight 16" Proof barreled 6ARC is not an ideal set up for PRS competition, but, in the grand scheme of things, the rifle did hot hold me back at all.  I had a couple of weights that fit the Q-cert handguard, so I slapped them on there as well, which got the rifle to right around 12lbs.  The balance point was almost where I want it, but not quite.  In all other ways, this was a very handy rifle to shoot.  I am actually thinking of getting a couple more weights that I can stack on it (Sawtooth weights are stackable), so that I can shoot some future local matches with it.  It shoots Hornady's Black 105gr ammo very well (it also shoots 108gr ELD-M and 103gr ELD-X well, but I had a larger supply of Hornady Black ammo on hand).

It chrono'ed pretty consistently for factory ammo.  Here are the measurements for a 20 shot group.

If I were to take out the fastest shot, SD drops down to 8fps.  

In terms of wind performance, it is a 5mph rifle, so slightly better than the 308 ammo I was going to use originally, but not as good as the 6.5CM that was my intended match rifle for this year (we make plans, but then life happens).

I do have to admit that I really enjoyed shooting the match with the MiniFix.  So much so, that I am seriously thinking of building another one for myself, since this rifle is technically my daughter's.

The closest shot we had was a bit over a couple of hundred yards.  The furthest was around 1150.  That was a bit challenging for the 16" barreled 6ARC, especially since the terrain there is tricky and wind is doing strange things.  Morning was relatively quiet wind-wise, but then the wind becamse gusty with changing directions.

It was a one day match with about 30 shooters (six squads) and ten stages.  The 17 year old kid who won the match was in my squad with his dad.  Apparently he is on the US team, so it should not be surrpising that he won.  He was very good.

Overall level of the shooters in the match was quite good.  I really was not sure what to expect.  Somewhat paradoxically, the only matches that I have shot in so far are the much larger two day NRL Hunter matches.  In those, I am just out of the bottom third in terms of skill level.  In this match, it was pretty much in the same spot, I think.  

The terrain was a little bit like Cameo, I think (I have been there, but not shot there), with some angle changes and sufficient vegetation to make getting on target occasionally troublesome. 

Only for Supporters
To read the rest of this article and access other paid content, you must be a supporter
Read full Article
post photo preview
Updates
Getting back on the horse, little by little

My original plan was to do a livestream on Thursday of this week, but I think I'll push it out to next week.  A few days at home is doing wonders for my recovery, but my voice is still not quite there.  I do not think any of you are looking to listen to me cough for two hours straight.

Also, I am going to try to shoot that local PRS match this coming Saturday, so doign a livestream next week after the match is likely to be more productive.  It is my first one, so I fully expect that I will screw it all up.  It should be a good learning experience.  I do not have a dedicated PRS rifle and I am not looking to set one up jsut yet.  If I like it, I'll put something together, but as far as competition goes, my focus is really on UKD matches like NRL Hunter, Competition Dynamics, etc.  My 6.5CM is not back yet, so I'll just shoot it with my 308 FIx.  It is not ideal, but it will do just fine for my purposes.  I am in no danger of winning anything either way and this will stress my ability to read wind.  A secondary purpse here is that I am not 100% certain what rifle I will take on a mule deer hunt with later this year, but it will be either something new to test or this 308.  Now that I think about it, the 308 is going with me regardless either as a primary rifle or as backup.  The rifle shoots, so if I miss, I know it is on me.

For the match, I have Burris XTR PS 5.5-30x56 scope on the 308 Fix.  I think the way they did the heads up display in these is a meaningful improvement over conventional riflescopes.

https://alnk.to/d3EjPHC or https://alnk.to/8iVRlGN

Optically, I think XTR Pro is a little better, but the EO integration in the XTR PS is, I think, in advantage.

In parallel, I am looking at the replacement AAC ammo (they replaced the faulty ammo and I have chrono results on it) and testing the optics of the 40mm scopes in parallel.

 

Only for Supporters
To read the rest of this article and access other paid content, you must be a supporter
Read full Article
Available on mobile and TV devices
google store google store app store app store
google store google store app tv store app tv store amazon store amazon store roku store roku store
Powered by Locals