DarkLordOfOptics
Politics • Science & Tech • Sports
SunwayFoto TCM3560 with IB-60 inverted ballhead
Back to tripods
July 25, 2023
post photo preview

Tripods have been coming up here with reasonable regularity and I have several for which I have not yet published a review.  Ideally, I should go to the range and make a proper video, but it is approximately eight thousand degrees outside in the Southwest and when you try to look up the UV index for this altitude in New Mexico, it basically says "are you f-ing retarded? this is when you stay home".  Perhaps, I should go back to making videos in my living room.

Either way, I have several SunwayFoto tripods here for review and I will do a video or two on them.  Now, that I have been using them for a while, I have to admit that they are well made and that they hold up well.  They also offer one hell of a deal.  The latest one I received is the 2830 and I will absolutely go on the record that if you are new to tripods and shooting off of them, this is the best deal going: https://sunwayfoto-store.com/products/t2830cs-carbon-fiber-tripod-for-hunting-with-inverted-ball-head-arca-swiss-picatinny-rail-adapter-clamp?ref=DLO&variant=42653765468318

This bundles a proper shooting tripod with Arca//Picatinny clamp and a cradle for conventionally stocked rifles. It is a pretty lightweight tripod, so it is not as sturdy as some with larger diameter legs, but the low axis head is very good.  The tripod is light.  Three section legs are quick to work.  It is plenty sturdy enough for most things you do with normal rifles.  If I were starting with tripod shooting, I'd focus on rimfire and midly recoiling ARs.  For that, it is perfect.  For typical hunting rifles, it is plenty sturdy enough for inside of 500/600 yards.

Sunway seems to be serious about the shooting market, so use "DLO" discount code to get another 5% off.

Now, I'll be clear: if you ask me what I will be taking to he field with me come hunting season, it will be the Gen2 Ascent from Spartan Precision.  The guys at Sunway will not like me saying it, but it is the truth.  However, for that, you have to buy into their magnetic stem ecosystem and the tripod itself is almost $1200 plus you'll need a few mounting adapters for your guns and optics.  If you are willing to spend this much money, it is the best made tripod I have.  However, if you are new to tripod shooting, I would suggest a smaller financial investment and more practice time. 

The tripod that is the subject of this article is the T3650 that is much beefier measurably heavier and undoubtedly sturdier.  Price-wise, it is a very good value for the money if you are looking for something that can carry a lot of weight yet collapse into a package that will fit into your luggage in a pinch.

Purely for shooting, having too many leg segments is not ideal.  The more segments you have, the longer it will take to deploy the legs and every interconnect between the legs adds weight.  T3650, as the name suggests, uses 36mm diameter carbon fiber tubes and has five leg segments.

I started putting together a spec table of all the different tripods I have.  There will be more columns here as I go along:

 Field Optics Research SequoiaField Optics Research Pro32-Mil ASFPLSpartan Precision Ascent Gen 2 Davros, WoodlandSunwayFoto TCM3650 with IB-65SunwayFoto TC2830CS
Weight, lbs3.955.53.75.62.9
Folded Length, in2723.7292325.2
Max Height, in58.558.3706656.5
Min Height, in4.57.171274.7
Leg max diameter, mm3232 3628
Leg wall thickness, mm11.2   
Max Load, lbs60115446644
Leg Segments33353
Pitch, deg+/-30+/-20+/-35, with 90deg portrait mode+/-47.5+/-35
Detachable LegsNoYesYesNoNo
Leg locksTwistTwistTwistTwistTwist
Pack diameter, in3.45.53.654
Head typeDome topBowl TopMagnetic stemIntegrated ballhed/flat top/bowl topEnbedded ballhead
ClampArcaArca/PicatinnyNAArca/PicatinnyArca/picatinny
Price$599$825$1,150$738$250
      
Best useShooting supportShooting supportShooting/ Hunting/ Photo/ ObservationShooting/ ObservationShooting/ Hunting/ Observation

As the specs suggest, it is a burly tripod that gets pretty tall, carries a lot of weight and packs into a fairly small size.  It comes with the usual accessories like spike feet, allen wrenches, adapter plate, etc.  More importantly, it also comes with a couple of different options to fit nearly any head onto the tripod body.  Mine arrived with the IB-65 head and also flat top and bowl adapters.  I ended up swapping the head for the IB-60 inverted ballhead which is also in these pcitures.

They have a few IB-65 heads from the first batch that did not lock all the way.  It locks, but if I mount a rifle in it toward the front of the stock, it can't quite hold it.  

Also, something I found with a large diameter integrated ball head is that when changing the shooting angle, the rotation axis is offset sufficiently far that the rifle buttpadtranslates forward or back a fair bit.

The IB-60 with the rotation axis much closer to the gun, keeps the back end of the stock more consistently.

Also, IB-60 has a tightening clamp where I can more easily adjust the ballhead tension.   The long lever of the IB-65 is either on or off.  With the IB-60, I can lock it tight or leave with some tension yet movable.

https://sunwayfoto-store.com/products/ib-60-inverted-ball-head-for-hunting-tripod-load-55lb25kg?_pos=1&_sid=4251fd49d&_ss=r&ref=DLO

In theory, IB-60 is a little taller, so it might be slightly less stable for shooting, but in practice, I can't tell the difference.  On balance, bowl top tripods like the Pro32 from Field Optics I have are still the steadiest, but we are splitting hairs here.  TC3650 can be set up as a bowl top, but I was looking for more flexibilty here, so I settled on the inverted ballhead.

Overall height of the tripod ended up about eye level for me.  I am 6ft tall and the clamp is right at the same height as my eyes.

In terms of problems with the tripod itself, I really did not have any.  Everything works as it should, but also keep in mind that it had primarily range use for me.  It packs short, but it is not a lightweight tripod.  For hunting, I prefer tripods in the 4lbs and under range.  Another thing to keep in mind when thinking of tripods is that smallest diameter it can pack into it.  That can make a difference whether you can slide into a side pocket of your pack or have to bring an extra bag for it.  It does come with a respectable carry bag.

TC3650 clocks in at just over 6 lbs with the IB-60 head.  However, given how stable it is, the weight is reasonable.  The height becomes very useful when shooting off of complicated terrain since it has enough leg length to accomodate slopes and inclines.  Another advantage of shorter leg segments is that if I want to collapse the legs and open them to the widest splay angle, I do not need quite as much space.  It is a very flexible tripod in terms of accomodating weird terrain.  The clamp natively works for both Arca and picatinny Rails, so you can adapt almost anything to it.

What is my final conclusion?  It is not a cheap tripod.  For how much you get, it is not an expensive one either.  Build quality is very good.  The issues with the IB-65 head that I had appear to be isolated to a couple samples from an early batch.  There is very little you can not do with this tripod be it hunting, shooting, observation or photography, but the price of flexibility is weight.  It is not obsenely heavy by any means and to go lighter you will give something up.  If you are looking for a "one and done" tripod, you could do a lot worse than this one.

community logo
Join the DarkLordOfOptics Community
To read more articles like this, sign up and join my community today
3
What else you may like…
Videos
Posts
Articles
Burris XTR PS HUD

Here is a better look at the Heads Up Display (HUD) in Burris' XTR PS scopes. In this case, I am looking through a 3.3-18x50, but the HUD is the same in both models.
https://alnk.to/4qN7csi

AFF10 code gets you extra 10% off on just about anything on Opticsplanet website starting at midnight tonight.

The more time I spent with HUD equipped scopes, the more I think that this is a significant step forward.

If they ever get a WMLRF to connect to this thing, it will be amazing, but even as is, I think it is a meaningful advantage.

00:09:18
Through the scope view at the STR-MIL reticle in Steiner H6Xi 2-12x42

Here is a quick look at the reticle through the scope. As I watch the video, it looks thinner in the picture than it does in real life. I have a suspicion that those relatively dense 0.2mrad hashmarks make the primary stadia stand out more than they would otherwise.

One one hand, I'd prefer for this reticle to be a little bolder or have some high visibility features.

On the other hand, it is pretty usable as is and the scope is quickly becoming one of my favourite MPVO designs currently on the market.

Next step will be to get it back on the gun, mount a piggy-backed RDS and do some shooting from 10 yards to 800 yards.
https://alnk.to/9bvy9a9

00:04:19
Zeiss SFL 12x50

Zeiss makes quite a few binoculars. Aside from an occasional misstep (Terra...), most of them are pretty good.
As with any product line, some models come together better than others.
Zeiss' SFL product line is something I looked at briefly, but never dwelled on it too much. They seemed like nice binoculars, but I never really looked at them carefully.
Imagine my surprise when the folks at Zeiss reached out and asked if I want to take a look at their new 12x50 version of the SFL.
They know I live out west, so they must have heard I have the space to really work out where the limits of a 12x50 binocular are.
Given that sending me a product to look at involves certain risks (until I am pretty much done with the review, I ignore marketing literature and any and all attempts from any company to tell me what to say), I figured that they either decided to live dangerously or that they are pretty damn confident of how good the product is.
I do not know for sure which one it is, but the ...

00:11:45
Burris Fullfield 3-12x56

For several years now I have been saying that I should look at hunting scopes a bit more carefully. I always get distracted, but not entirely.

Just got my hands onto the re-designed Burris Fullfield 3-12x56.

Just received the 3-12x56 Fullfield with #4 reticle and illuminated dot.

Optically, it looks quite nice. I was not sure if they would be able to pull off a 56mm lens on a scope this short at this price, but it looks like they did. It seems to be very nicely corrected.

Eye relief is pretty consistent. It looks to be a hair over 3 inches on 12x. Once I got it set up on12x, I did not have to make any adjustments to my head position at other magnifications.

On lower power, there is enough eyerelief flexibility to accommodate sitting and standing shooting positions. I do not have to crane my neck when shooting sitting or standing.

The turrets have surprisingly decent feel, but I plan to keep them covered once the scope is sighted in.

The reticle is very visible and the illuminated ...

Do you remember what the turrets felt like on your Zeiss LRP S5? Did your elevation and windage turrets feel similar? Mine are quite different.

The elevation turret on mine doesn't feel nearly as good as the windage turret.

The windage turret is very tactile and audible, you can feel each click thunk into place.

My elevation turret is barely audible and the clicks aren't nearly as positive as the windage. It's easy to skip past click detent in the elevation turret, this not a problem on the windage turret.

I also posted this question on snipershide as "Gil P."

Douglas Murray's latest is definitely worth a read

As is often the case these days, I am a little under the weather, so rather than work through the weekend as I usually do, I figured I can play hooky for a few hours and read a book.

The book happened to be Douglas Murray's "On Democracies and Death Cults: Israel and the Future of Civilization" that came out a couple of weeks ago.
https://amzn.to/4lVdR9c

I like his writing style which makes this very difficult subject matter a little bit of an easier reading. Still, he goes through a lot of eyewitness testimony of Palestinian atrocities and it is far from easy reading.

Easy or not, it should be required reading for all of our brainwashed college students demonstrating on campuses and chanting genocidal Hamas slogans.

It really should be required reading for anyone looking to understand the conflict in the Middle East.

A first look at Steiner H6Xi 2-12x42
MPVOs are finally getting some attention

Here are some initial thoughts on the Steiner H6Xi 2-12x42.

I finally had a chance to shoot with it both supported and unsupported, which is an important part of figuring out how usable an optic is.

I found what looks to be more accurate specifications in the manual that came with the H6Xi, so the spec table is now updated:

To re-iterate from an earlier post, Eurooptic is selling the H6Xi 2-12x42 for $1350 and at that price, it is easily the best deal going in this category: https://alnk.to/90ALO3C

Only for Supporters
To read the rest of this article and access other paid content, you must be a supporter
Read full Article
AAC Ammo: Trouble In Paradise
I think this is the almighty telling me to start reloading again

Well, since I was running a little low on AAC Precision 175gr 308 ammo, I ordered another batch.  This one came from a different lot than the batch I had before.

Only for Supporters
To read the rest of this article and access other paid content, you must be a supporter
Read full Article
Deep into the 40s
42-44mm Riflescopes

I have about 13 months left to be in my 40s, so I figured this is my last opportunity to get cheeky with this project title.

As I mentioned during last week's livestream, I am kicking off a large review encompassing seven different riflescopes that really share only one thing in common: their objectives are in the 42-44mm range.

Here is a comparison table of the specs for the scopes I have on hand.  Note that the Swampfox Warhawk 2-10x44 is not going to be in this comparison very much.  I'll do a separate video on it.  The biggest reason for that is simply that this spec table is becoming too long and comparing so many scopes all at the same time is exponentially more difficult.  I was going to take out either the Warhawk or the Blackhound since neither of them have a zero stop, so I flipped a coin and Blackhound got to stay.  I will go over it a little bit below the table.

I did not set out to have this particular line-up in mind, but I like this riflescope type, so I ended up with all of these on hand.  

Some of these scopes I have lready reviewed quite thoroughly, namely the Blackhound and Tract.

If you look at the specs carefully, you'll see that these range from true ultrashort designs (GPO and March), to "kinda short" designs (Leapers, Delta, Leupold and Blackhound) to a conventionally sized Tract Toric.  Some of these lean toward the MPVO category.  Some are unabashedly aimed at the Crossover market.  Tract stands alone as a relatively conventional hunting scope, except configured very nicely to do everything as necessary.  Another scope that would fit this category very well also that is no longer here is Vortex Strike Eagle 3-18x44.  I might reference it occasionally.

I have a good amount of mileage with all of these, although I have not yet released a final review on every design.  Still, I can offer some initial thoughts in order of ascending price.

Only for Supporters
To read the rest of this article and access other paid content, you must be a supporter
Read full Article
Available on mobile and TV devices
google store google store app store app store
google store google store app tv store app tv store amazon store amazon store roku store roku store
Powered by Locals