I had an interesting question pop up: what would I choose between these two Vortex LPVOs: PST Gen2 1-6x24 and the new Strike Eagle 1-8x24 FFP. The first is made in the Phillipines. It is SFP with a fiber illuminated dot. The second is made in China, albeit by a pretty good OEM, and has a FFP reticle with regular etch and fill illumination.
It so happened that I was at Vortex for a few days and they have a nicely outfitted showroom there. They happened to have all of their LPVOs, mounted on AR-15s with collapsible stocks sitting next to each other: Razor Gen3 1-10x24, Razor Gen2 1-6x24, PST Gen2 1-6x24, Strike Eagle 1-8x24FFP, Strike Eagle 1-8x24SFP.
I put them all on 1x, adjusted the eyepieces to my eye, the stocks to the right length of pull, turned on the illumination and started experimenting with presenting them from a low ready position. There is a taxidermied bear on the opposite side of the showroom that made for a convenient target. There was, obviously, no ammo and the bear is still there in exactly the same condition in which I found it.
I had plenty of time on my hands, so I went back and forth between the scopes quite a lot. I also made it a point to not always be standing in an optimal position, so some of the presentations were pretty wonky on purpose (yes, a lot of it probably looked idiotic, but the good people at Vortex politely looked away).
For the most part, I ended up simply re-enforcing some of the previously existing notions. Keep in mind that is all on 1x only:
-In terms of ease of use and eyebox, the 1-6x24 Gen2 Razor still has a slight edge over the others. It is not surprising SF people from a few countries like it as much as they do (no, contrary to some opinions circulated on the web, they are not gragile and they do not shift zero randomly. This is likely the most battle proven LPVO on the market today).
-The 1-10x24 Gen3 Razor is almost as quick, but if your presentation is a bit off and the dominant eye is not quite properly lined up to the scope, the illuminated dot is not visible. That's the case with all FFP scopes. With SFP scopes, even when your eye is a bit to the side and the image is blacked out, the bright dot is often still visible in the eyepiece. If you keep both eyes open, it can be almost like an OEG.
-The PST Gen2, in many ways, feels very much like the Gen2 Razor, but it is not quite as good optically and the FOV is not quite as well corrected. It is still very good though, especially given the cost. In terms of engagement speed it felt very close to the Gen3 Razor and slightly behind the Gen2 Razor.
-Both of the Strike Eagle 1-8x24 scopes are not really my cup of tea. The FFP one is a little better than the earlier SFP model, so if you are set on a 1-8x, the FFP version is better. However, I have to admit that I really preferred the PST Gen2 to both of them. With the Strike Eagles, the eyebox was tighter, the distortion was not as well corrected and the reticles are a little questionable.
To re-iterate: this was all on 1x only.