DarkLordOfOptics
Politics • Science & Tech • Sports
Guns, Optics, 2nd Amendment and resisting the Left in everything they touch.
Interested? Want to learn more about the community?

Learn more first
Choosing a general purpose AR-15

If you are in the market for an AR-15 of some sort, options are numerous, to put it mildly. I have a bunch of them and most I have built myself from pieces. For quite a few years, I would build something, play with it, note what I'd like to change, sell it, and build a new one. Lather, rinse, repeat.
For a little while now, my line-up of different ARs has not really been changing very much, which probably means that I have gotten to the point where I actually like the builds that I have and they range from an ultra-light to folding to DMR-type ARs in 5.56x45/223Rem. Then there are a couple of 300Blackout AR-pistols, one 6.5Grendel AR that has been with me the longest of all the ARs I have on hand, one 458SOCOM, one 6ARC I built recently and a weird AR/AK hybrid (KS-47) that shoots 7.62x39 and takes AK magazines.
A friend of mine approached me recently with a somewhat differently phrased question than I have heard before. It was something along these lines: "you lost all of your guns in a massive fire/tragic boating accident/pick a disaster of your choice. You have nothing left. Knowing what you know now, where do you start rebuilding your collection? What AR do you buy first?"
I gave him a lengthy treatise on what I would do, but as far as ARs go, I would just recreate a couple that I already have since I like them, most notably, the one I talked about in this post:
https://darklordofoptics.locals.com/post/1252977/guns-of-the-dark-lord-part-3-ar-15

He looked at that and said: this looks to be expensive and a lot of work. I tried to make a feeble argument that once all the pieces are in, I can put this together in less than an hour. He made a compelling argument that it does not quite work this way for sane people who have not spent last few decades obsessively tinkering with guns.

He was specifically trying to get me to identify an AR or two that I would buy as a complete gun. I brought up the Honey Badger. He looked at the pricetag and laughed in my face. Now, I happen to think it is worth the money, but it is certainly not a budget option.

As an aside, if I did not have budget limitations, the first ARI would buy if I lost all of my guns, would be Q's 300Blackout Honey Badger pistol with Tash Panda Suppressor, Steiner CQT sight (https://bit.ly/38EgP0h) and PA's tiny micro magnifier (https://bit.ly/3DnfGFR). That's around $14k, so I totally see why that is unlikely to be a popular option.

Since the conversation wasn't going anywhere, we pretty much started haggling on the boundary conditions. He wanted to limit it to a few hundred dollars and you can get a decent enough AR for under $1k, but there will be some compromises made that I would rather avoid.

We decided to take a step up from the low end stuff, but significantly moderate my snobbish tendencies at the same time.

Once you take that one step up, you end with a plethora of increasingly competent choices.

Before I get to those choices, I will still mention, that I really STRONGLY prefer to build the lower part myself with the trigger, grip and stock I prefer. Then again, I am kinda particular in this regard.

With that out of the way, in terms of best bang for the buck, your best choice is probably one of the rifles from Palmetto's PSA Custom line. PSA has really stepped up in terms of quality in recent years. There is a bunch of good options there and I would go for something like this 16" barrel rifle: https://bit.ly/39xLzAV. It comes with a 223Wylde chamber and upgraded trigger. They have a bunch of different color options, so there is a lot to choose from. At $1100, I do not think I could do better price-wise building one if choosing similar quality components.

Historically, in this category, I would just recommend something from BCM like the RECCE-16 (https://bit.ly/3F4Sihh). It is on the upper end of the price range I would prefer to stay in given the boundary conditions ($1700), but BCM does good work. My one beef with it is that it has a 5.56 NATO chamber, while I generally prefer 223 Wylde or something along those lines. The trigger is essentially a cleaned up Mil-spec trigger, but it is serviceable.

As another side note, Matt at Everyday marksman has a couple of really detailed articles on choosing general purpose ARs. I always thought it was odd how he can use such sound thinking to come up with completely incorrect conclusions... (I am sure he would read this anyway, but I figured I should tag him just in case @TheMarksman ). Interestingly, the exact BCM rifle I talk about above is also on his list. That may be the first time he and I agree on an AR configurations.

That brings us back to what I would go with for similar money, which is one of the FoldAR offerings. I do not recall if I talked about FoldAR in any detail in the past, but if I havn't I should.

I have a thing for takedown ARs and theirs is the best one I am aware of. I have their Gen1 folding upper from the very first batch they manufactured years ago (naturally I put it on a lower I built myself, but I already covered that), and they have made several meaningful improvements since then. It is available with three chambers: 223Wylde, 300Blackout and 6.5Grendel. For a general purpose AR, 223Wylde is the way to go (https://bit.ly/3s4oPP5), but if you want to hunt with it, 6.5Grendel should be at the top of your list). They recently started using an adjustable bolt carrier from Bootleg (I have been switching all of my builds to it as well), so that if you choose to get a suppressor at a later point, you can adapt the gas system to it. The trigger is ALG's cleaned up Mil-Spec trigger, i.e. more or less the same thing as what BCM uses.
The barrel is nitrided vs BCM's phosphated barrel with chrome-lined bore. Both are good options, although I tend to lean toward nitrided barrels more often than not. Chrome-lined barrels are harder to make accurate, but BCM does pretty well with them.
Then, of course, there is a trick to it: the bloody thing folds in half. Then, it unfolds and returns to zero. Mine has been returning to zero for a few years now. They rethought the interface between the barrel and the upper receiver and it seems to re-engage very consistently.
It adds around six ounces to the weight of the rifle if memory serves me right, but it still clocks in barely above six pounds as equipped.
Mine is set up with a fixed length ultralight stock, so it is bit lighter than that.
When folded, the rifle neatly fits into a 22" long Pelican Air 1525 case, which is how I store it. FoldAR ships all of their guns with a backpack. This is a very easy gun to transport discreetly.
At the moment, I have PA's 3x Microprism (https://bit.ly/3KuU7oL) on it with XS' XTI DWT sights (https://bit.ly/3y4J1nO). It is a very lightweight sighting combination for not a lot of money. The added benefit is that it is of comparatively low profile, so it does not catch on things all that much. That handguard has M-lok slots, so adding accessories is pretty straightforward. I've got a Streamlight flashlight attached that I added at some point for a night class and kept it there.
Is it worth the premium over the much less expensive PSA? To me it is.

post photo preview
Interested? Want to learn more about the community?

Learn more first
What else you may like…
Videos
Posts
Articles
Blast From The Past: Millett ZoomDot RDS

I dug this thing up purely by accident. It has been a long time since I used it for anything, but I am thinking I should, especially as I work on a magnifier video.

MIllet's ZoomDot was a unique red dot sight that had auto brightness and variable dot size from 1MOA to 10MOA.

Early ones, like mine, were made in the US. Millett had some aspirations of selling these to the US military.

I do not think they got very far, then the company was bought by Bushnell and essentially shut down after a little bit. At some point, the manufacturing for the ZoomDot moved to China and it was not really the same.

00:05:44
Scout Scopes: Burris 2.75x20

Scout scopes are almost like a forgotten art form these days. There is an occasional discussion either on how they are the greatest thing since sliced bread because 1) THE colonel said so 2) if you do not think they are, refer to rule number 1.
Alternatively, the prevailing thought is that they are completely useless and if LPVOs existed in Jeff Cooper's time, there would never be such a thing as scout scopes.
The truth, as is usually the case, resides somewhere in the middle.
Scout scopes do have their place, but they are definitely a niche product. It is, however, an interesting niche.
Scout scope pickings are relatively slim in terms of what's on offer.
Leupold makes a 1.5-4x28 https://alnk.to/gKSibYj
Burris makes a 2-7x32 and 2.75x20
Vortex has a 2-7x32 in the Crossfire line
There are also a few out there from UTG, Aimsports, etc.

I strongly lean toward compact fixed power designs, so Burris 2.75x20 https://alnk.to/cSJCBQx is probably my favourite and is the subject of this ...

00:11:58
Integrix M1 MRAD Reticle in the 3-18x44

Wind was really making things difficult, but at least this gives you a look at the reticle.
It is a respectable design that is conceptually closer to SKMR reticles than to the ones I usually gravitate to. They also have an M2 that is, I think, a little better.
In the grand scheme of things, the M1 did not take me long to get used to and it is not giving me any real issues.
https://alnk.to/9TaI2kH

00:06:33
Integrix 3-18x44 Tracking Follow-up

I reached out to Leapers to relay the issues I found with reticle sizing and tracking in the 3-18x44 scope they sent me.

They confirmed that the scope I have here is an engineering model. They also talked to engineering and, apparently, they found the same issues I did with the mrad model and fixed them for the production run.

The MOA model (https://alnk.to/eZIJo9a) is, according to them, spot on. The issues were only present in pre-production mrad scopes.

Once they get production scopes going, I plan to re-visit them. I think the first one to become available will be the 4.5-27x model with the M2 Mrad reticle. I saw it during SHOT and I think it will be more up my alley than the M1, though the latter is still serviceable.

This is strange but once in my lifetime I felt fortunate to be not smart enogh to be in Harvard University...

Memorial Day Sales

I am beginning to see some early Memorial Day Sale emails in my inbox.
If I see anything interesting, I'll add it to this post which will be pinned to the top, rather than inundate you with incessant "it's a sale!" emails. Better keep it all in one spot.

The first one I see is from Opticsplanet. https://alnk.to/cwU58u8
They have all sorts of stuff rom Burris and Steiner discounted including the recently introduced Burris XTR PS 5.5-30x56 for $2199 https://alnk.to/d3Em4Su and the rather unusual Steiner T6Xi 3-18x56 https://alnk.to/ge7ZJBN
Eliminator 6 gets you $400 of bonus bucks to use on something else. https://alnk.to/flycPy8

Tract Optics will be running a 10% storewide sale starting Thursday with the discount code "REMEMBRANCE". While I generally like their products, the one that is really agreeing with me the most is the new 2.5-15x44 with MRAD Eagleman reticle. https://tractoptics.com/toric-uhd-30mm-2-5-15x44-ffp-illuminated-mrad-eagleman-long-range-hunting-rifle-scope/
I am sure ...

First PRS Match is behind me
High Noon at Del Norte

My first PRS match is officially behind me.  It was, I think an officially sanctioned regional PRS match at the shooting range called Del Norte about an hour from me (just east of Rio Rancho).
As I discussed previously, rather than using the rifle I originally prepared for it, I ended up having to change gears at the last moment and slapping a 5-25x56 Tangent on my daughter's 6ARC MiniFIx.  A lightweight 16" Proof barreled 6ARC is not an ideal set up for PRS competition, but, in the grand scheme of things, the rifle did hot hold me back at all.  I had a couple of weights that fit the Q-cert handguard, so I slapped them on there as well, which got the rifle to right around 12lbs.  The balance point was almost where I want it, but not quite.  In all other ways, this was a very handy rifle to shoot.  I am actually thinking of getting a couple more weights that I can stack on it (Sawtooth weights are stackable), so that I can shoot some future local matches with it.  It shoots Hornady's Black 105gr ammo very well (it also shoots 108gr ELD-M and 103gr ELD-X well, but I had a larger supply of Hornady Black ammo on hand).

It chrono'ed pretty consistently for factory ammo.  Here are the measurements for a 20 shot group.

If I were to take out the fastest shot, SD drops down to 8fps.  

In terms of wind performance, it is a 5mph rifle, so slightly better than the 308 ammo I was going to use originally, but not as good as the 6.5CM that was my intended match rifle for this year (we make plans, but then life happens).

I do have to admit that I really enjoyed shooting the match with the MiniFix.  So much so, that I am seriously thinking of building another one for myself, since this rifle is technically my daughter's.

The closest shot we had was a bit over a couple of hundred yards.  The furthest was around 1150.  That was a bit challenging for the 16" barreled 6ARC, especially since the terrain there is tricky and wind is doing strange things.  Morning was relatively quiet wind-wise, but then the wind becamse gusty with changing directions.

It was a one day match with about 30 shooters (six squads) and ten stages.  The 17 year old kid who won the match was in my squad with his dad.  Apparently he is on the US team, so it should not be surrpising that he won.  He was very good.

Overall level of the shooters in the match was quite good.  I really was not sure what to expect.  Somewhat paradoxically, the only matches that I have shot in so far are the much larger two day NRL Hunter matches.  In those, I am just out of the bottom third in terms of skill level.  In this match, it was pretty much in the same spot, I think.  

The terrain was a little bit like Cameo, I think (I have been there, but not shot there), with some angle changes and sufficient vegetation to make getting on target occasionally troublesome. 

Only for Supporters
To read the rest of this article and access other paid content, you must be a supporter
Read full Article
post photo preview
Updates
Getting back on the horse, little by little

My original plan was to do a livestream on Thursday of this week, but I think I'll push it out to next week.  A few days at home is doing wonders for my recovery, but my voice is still not quite there.  I do not think any of you are looking to listen to me cough for two hours straight.

Also, I am going to try to shoot that local PRS match this coming Saturday, so doign a livestream next week after the match is likely to be more productive.  It is my first one, so I fully expect that I will screw it all up.  It should be a good learning experience.  I do not have a dedicated PRS rifle and I am not looking to set one up jsut yet.  If I like it, I'll put something together, but as far as competition goes, my focus is really on UKD matches like NRL Hunter, Competition Dynamics, etc.  My 6.5CM is not back yet, so I'll just shoot it with my 308 FIx.  It is not ideal, but it will do just fine for my purposes.  I am in no danger of winning anything either way and this will stress my ability to read wind.  A secondary purpse here is that I am not 100% certain what rifle I will take on a mule deer hunt with later this year, but it will be either something new to test or this 308.  Now that I think about it, the 308 is going with me regardless either as a primary rifle or as backup.  The rifle shoots, so if I miss, I know it is on me.

For the match, I have Burris XTR PS 5.5-30x56 scope on the 308 Fix.  I think the way they did the heads up display in these is a meaningful improvement over conventional riflescopes.

https://alnk.to/d3EjPHC or https://alnk.to/8iVRlGN

Optically, I think XTR Pro is a little better, but the EO integration in the XTR PS is, I think, in advantage.

In parallel, I am looking at the replacement AAC ammo (they replaced the faulty ammo and I have chrono results on it) and testing the optics of the 40mm scopes in parallel.

 

Only for Supporters
To read the rest of this article and access other paid content, you must be a supporter
Read full Article
A first look at Steiner H6Xi 2-12x42
MPVOs are finally getting some attention

Here are some initial thoughts on the Steiner H6Xi 2-12x42.

I finally had a chance to shoot with it both supported and unsupported, which is an important part of figuring out how usable an optic is.

I found what looks to be more accurate specifications in the manual that came with the H6Xi, so the spec table is now updated:

To re-iterate from an earlier post, Eurooptic is selling the H6Xi 2-12x42 for $1350 and at that price, it is easily the best deal going in this category: https://alnk.to/90ALO3C

Only for Supporters
To read the rest of this article and access other paid content, you must be a supporter
Read full Article
Available on mobile and TV devices
google store google store app store app store
google store google store app tv store app tv store amazon store amazon store roku store roku store
Powered by Locals