DarkLordOfOptics
Politics • Science & Tech • Sports
Guns, Optics, 2nd Amendment and resisting the Left in everything they touch.
Interested? Want to learn more about the community?

Learn more first
Visiting Primary Arms

Primary Arms visit turned out to be quite surprising. I have been talking to the gentleman who runs PA on and off for a while now, but somehow I still wasn't grasping the entire scale of their operation. Now, to be fair, I am certainly still not aware of everything they do. However, looking back on it, I really shouldn't have been that surprised. They have a seriously substantial warehouse since they stock they stuff they sell and, looking at their website, it should have been apparent that requires space and manpower.

What I didn't know is that they have a pretty solid engineering group in-house and how much effort and resources go into the Primary Arms branded optics. When PA optics line started, what they had were just comparatively standard OEM scopes that stood out because of the ACSS reticles. As I have elaborated previously, some ACSS reticles I like and some I do not. A lot of it is just personal preference, to be honest, and some is just stylistically differences. However, all of the ACSS reticles I have seen to date are intelligently conceived and I can clearly see what the design goals were and how they went about achieving them. That's more than I can say about most reticles out there.

PA optics line still has the various ACSS reticles, but there is a lot more to them now which is how they ended up within my field of view, so to speak.
Many of their products stopped looking like "me too" designs with good reticles. The line of micro-prisms that I have been talking about is unique to them. Other small prismatics out there come from different OEMs.

The new PLxC 1-8x24 LPVO is just exceptional and easily clears the bar to make it onto my list of recommendations (with room to spare, frankly). Optomechanically, it is clearly going after scopes like Razor Gen3 and ATACR. Given the price, if they ever add a diffractive reticle to it, they will absolutely be in the same conversation.

The interesting part is that when I first saw that scope, it absolutely threw me for a loop. At this stage in the game, when I look at a scope, I can usually make a pretty good guess which OEM it is from, especially which Japanese OEM. This scope sorta looked like a LOW design, except I had never seen that exact version (and for a good reason since it turned out to be entirely new and likely proprietary to PA). The turrets, however, did not look like it and did not feel like it. Click feel was different and when I took the removable part off, the insides were kinda sealed. I generally do not take scopes apart beyond what is expected of a consumer (sort of a courtesy to the manufacturers; although there are exceptions to that), so I did not go further.

Now, that I got a chance to spend a little time with the team at PA, it all makes sense. There is a good size engineering group in-house and an increasing number of the PA optics have some elements of their own design, with turrets being at the top of the list. There are other things coming though. For example, they are a bit cagey about what is happening there, but they are building a cleanroom. You do not need a cleanroom like that for QC.

Now, one of the things I look for when I visit companies is the quality of the team. If you have a cohesive team, a couple of smart engineers and company support you can get a lot of stuff done. The gentleman who is in charge of engineering at PA looked strangely familiar. It turned out that we had crossed paths in the past (through my dayjob) a decade or so ago. More importantly, we have some mutual friends who speak highly of his abilities. That's the kind of stuff I pay attention to and that also explains why I am seeing increasingly sophisticated opto-mechanical designs coming out of PA, with more on the way. Also, I got a glimpse into the insides of one of his turrets designs (looking at the CAD screen over his shoulder) and it is a clever system that should be durable.

For another example, PA has a few red dot sights in different price ranges and the new one I got to play with is the SR-10. It is a part of their SLx line, so it is on the budget end of things. We'll see how it does, but offhand, it looks like a pretty straightforward Docter-pattern open emitter red dot sight for use on both pistols and long guns. However, for a couple of hundred bucks, it comes with a picatinny mount and a very slim Glock MOS adapter. I'll confirm, but I am pretty sure it will sit low enough to co-witness with standard Glock sights. Decent collimation quality with a 3MOA dot.

The product line I have been paying most attention to lately was probably GLx. Don't get me wrong, the new PLxC seems good enough to satisfy even my optics snobbery and the SLx are very good budget options (admittedly, I am mostly familiar with SLx red dots and micro-prisms). GLx, however, might be the best bang for the buck of the bunch, starting with the 2x prismatic I looked at a little while back. Then, I looked at the 2.5-10x44 that is very feature rich and just excellent mechanically (it also has their own turret design and, now that I met the engineering team, I understand why it is excellent). Optically, it is better than adequate, but not exceptional. It is good enough for me to recommend it overall, though. I knew they had new GLx scopes coming, and that is what I really wanted to see while I was there. They were refreshingly open about their upcoming products. A couple of them they asked me to not talk about yet, but there are several that are coming soon enough to discuss. There were four new variable scopes I saw. One was the 1-10x24 FFP LPVO made in Japan by JOL. Three were made in the Philippines, all with FFP reticles: 1-6x24, 3-18x44 and 4.5-27x56. I got a chance to see near-production quality prototypes of all four and I was, honestly, pretty impressed.

General disclaimer: there isn't all that much I can immediately say from looking at scope indoors, but there are a few things to look for and I did not see any glaring problems. Mechanically, everything had a good feel and all had PA's own turrets that I noted earlier. I am not entirely sure what the final pricing will be and I suspect they are still finalizing that. Once I know the specifics, I'll let you know.

The 1-10x24 is a bit on the heavy side of the LPVO world, but I have seen this optical system before and it really is quite good with a well designed eyepiece, so it is easy to get behind. It should play nicely against other LPVOs out there that are used in a DMR-ish role, i.e. on accurate AR carbines that have to work from up-close and personal out to a few hundred yards.

The 1-6x24 was completely new to me. I had no idea it was in the works. Of the two LPVOs, this one is probably the one I am more curious about since I have not seen that optical system before. It did look quite respectable. Reticle illumination seemed adequately bright, but I was indoors the whole time. That's something to check. The eyepiece, however, is done very well, so I expect it to be quite easy to get behind. We had a long warehouse to use, so I set the scopes up on a tripod and spent some time peering through them on different magnifications. The 1-6x24 had good detail and good flare control best I could tell.

The scope I was arguably most impressed with was the 3-18x44. It has the same excellent zero-lock and zero-stop turrets I liked on the 2.5-10x44, but a better magnification range for crossover use and likely better image quality. With this one, we are getting into magnification ranges where there isn't a ton I can really say indoors, but it looked promising. This scope should be a contender as a crossover scope for anything from accurate ARs to lightweight precision rifles. I'll post full specs once available.

Same goes for the 4.5-27x56 model. It appeared to have more or less the same mechanical features, so I have reasonable confidence it will work well. I did not see anything obviously wrong optically, so that is encouraging too.

All of these GLx scopes showed some commonality of mechanical design and eyepiece design, which is a good thing. GLx scopes seem to sit in that rough sweetspot where you can get a lot for your money, but these are not cheap scopes. That's roughly the same market where Vortex' PST Gen2 plays. Various Athlon Ares scopes are in there as well as several others. This is where you can find decent quality Japanese scopes and higher end Phillipine-made and Chinese designs. This is really where the battle of the OEMs is happening right now, I think.

Lastly, I wanted to look at how they do QC and it turns out that every PA branded optics that comes in, no matter how expensive, is looked at. Every single one is taken out of the box and checked. That, I did not expect. To the best of my knowledge, for the inexpensive chinese optics, noone else checks every single one. With higher end products that is pretty common, but checking EVERYTHING is pretty unusual.

Overall, it was an interesting visit. PA is located in the part of the country I visit with reasonable regularity, so I'll make it a point to check on them every once in a while. I kinda want to know what they plan to do with that cleanroom.

Interested? Want to learn more about the community?

Learn more first
What else you may like…
Videos
Posts
Articles
Leupold Mark 4HD 2.5-10x42 Wrap-up

Here is the final overview of the Mark 4HD 2.5-10x42. https://alnk.to/af13zN9
I liked the scope overall. It does harken back to the times of simpler scopes though with a bolder reticle, fixed parallax and lighter weight.
There is value in that simplicity.
Image quality is quite good. Flare control is good. FOV is midpack. Elevation turret has zerosop and zerolock. Clicks are decent, but unexceptional. The scope stayed zeroed without any issues and has rather nice eyebox.

Its most direct competitor is Steiner H6Xi 2-12x42 https://alnk.to/dApsdiV and while similar on paper, they are very different in real life. Steiner is clearly the more precision shooting oriented setup with a more sophisticated and thinner reticle accompanied by side focus.

Mark 4HD has a bolder and simpler reticle, lacks parallax adjustment and stays a bit lighter.

Choose what's more important for you.

00:17:42
Vortex Defender XL Green

This is the second time Vortex' Defender XL crosses my path. I was very impressed with the original red dot version, so I was curious to see how the one with the green dot works for my eyes.
To get the details, see the attached video.
The cliff's notes version is that I am just as impressed with this one. In terms of collimation quality and parallax control, it is quite exceptional.
https://alnk.to/881BEV1

00:10:20
Primary Arms HTX-1 US Made red dot sight

I've had this RDS for a bit over two months now and I am beyond pleased with it.
Despite some spirited abuse, it keeps soldiering on.
https://alnk.to/1C9z5dw
It is a very nice RDS and being fully made in the US does not hurt either.

00:13:03
Telson Affiliate discount is now 15%

Quick heads up.
Telson sent out an email a few days ago saying that the affiliate discount is now 15% instead of the original 6%.
I changed the discount code to DLO15. If that does not work, try to DLO6. It will be the same 15% discount whichever code works.
https://telsonoptics.com/shop/toxin-3-18x50-ir-ffp/?ref=llkqsdus

As a reminder, what I am doing with Telson is a little different from what is normally done with affiliate marketing.

Whatever affiliate commission I generate with Telson will be converted to Telson gift certificates and raffled off to the supporters here during my livestreams.

My dad should be out of the hospital in a week or so, so my schedule will, hopefully, go back to semi-normal depending on what his mobility ends up being.

Waiting for Monday

October 7th attach happened on the Jewish holiday of Simchat Torah.
The anticipated release of the remaining hostages ny Hamas it’s also on Simchat Torah two years later.
It has been an interesting couple of years.
Trump is supposed to go to Israel on Monday to be there in person when hostages return.
It will be interesting to see if Hamas decided to got a misguided power play there.
Trump has many flaws, but he certainly does not appreciate being played.
We might have a few interesting days ahead of us.
https://open.substack.com/pub/darklordofoptics/p/anticipation?r=y4q3j&utm_medium=ios

Two Years

It is the second anniversary of the Hamas' October 7th massacre.
The consequences of it were quite startling, most critically the overwhelming wave of sympathy for Hamas among the Western intellectuals and groypers, among others.
As I write this, Hamas is still holding hostages in inhuman conditions and hundreds of thousand of people across Europe (and quite a few in the US) are celebrating October 7th.
There is no way to sugar coat it: if you are celebrating 2nd anniversary of October 7th, you are celebrating the day when thousand of Islamist terrorists murdered over a thousand Jews. There is no other way to look at this that I can think of.
I will leave you with that somber thought and with this short clip from Triggernometry that I thought was very well communicated.

post photo preview
Zenith Rifle by Alpine Riflecraft
First Look at The Ultimate Mountain Rifle

As many of you are likely aware, I am heading out to Montana for a mule deer hunt in a few days.  I will also have an additional cow elk tag, since I did not draw anythign in New Mexico.

My original plan was to borrow one of the MegaFix prototypes from Q.  However, all three properly fucntioning prototypes of the MEgaFix they have are in Africa taking down a broad range of animals.  The way I go hunting usually involves two rifles.  One primary, which is typcially something I am doing an article on and one backup which is something I know works in case I need it in a pinch.

My backup rifle is the OG Fix chambered for 308Win.  You have seen this gun many times over the years.  It was the subject of a dedicated video.  

I hunt with it and occasionally shoot NRL Hunter matches with it (shot two this year).  

As configured, it clocks in at a bit under 11lbs with the scope, https://alnk.to/af179CG, bipod, full length Arca rail from Sawtooth and LSP vertical grip.  I could make it a little lighter, but after some consideration, I decided to keep it in this configuration.  Eventually, I will upgrade it to Area 419 rings (I have been slowly switching to them almost across the board), but beyond that I plan to do absolutely nothing with it until I finally shoot the barrel out.  Ammo is a different ballgame and I am about to embark on an experiment with NAS3 cases, but that's a story for another day.

I still wanted somethign new to test, so I reched out to my Guns & Ammo editor to see if he has any ideas.  He usually does and this case was not the exception.  He connected me with a gentleman who owns a Canadian company called Alpine Riflecraft.  They are on a mission to make the world's best mountain hunting rifle and the Zenith is the product of their efforts.

I have now spent a couple of days at the range with it and have some early impressions to share.

Only for Supporters
To read the rest of this article and access other paid content, you must be a supporter
Read full Article
Reference Standard, 2025
Quite a few changes

 

As a reminder, the plan is to choose scopes as my reference standards in a few categories and make sure I keep them on hand for at least a year or so.  If they move on somewhere, I have to designate something else as the reference standard in that category.  There might be a couple of reference standard designs in each category to split them by price range.

Here is the riflescope categorization that I like to use https://darklordofoptics.locals.com/post/5212669/riflescope-type-classification 

Do keep in mind, that some categories I am not as well versed in as I'd like to be.  Also, there might be scopes in each category I consider exceptional, but do not have on hand.  Reference standard has to be something I have here and will use as a basis for comparisons.  I will endeavor to use optics that I believe to be at the top of their category, but it is not always possible.  Natirually, these will lean heavily toward mrad designs.  I avoid MOA like the plague whenever possible.

 

Fixed 1x
Interestingly, I do not actually have any 1x prismatics at the moment.  However, a friend of mine inherited the PA GLx 1x and my brother has Primary Arms SLx 1x Microprism.  https://bit.ly/3uLqu0E I Most of the differences between modern 1x prismatics come down to reticles and eyebox.  On balance, GLx is probably the yardstick for the rest of them.

 

Fixed mag small prism
No changes here.  This can go in a variety of different directions depending on personal preferences and price.  It is not practical to have a reference standard for every magnification and with compact prismatics I do like 3x as a good compromise magnification.  These scopes are a step up from people who have been using red dots with magnifiers and want a better experience at distance.  This one will also go to Primary Arms.  Technically, I like GLx 2x more than SLx 3x, but 2x is such a unique magnification that it is not a very good yard stick for comparisons.  SLX 3x Microprism it is, then.  

 

Fixed mag large prism

Somewhat oddly, with large prism scopes, I start leaning toward higher magnifications.  I want these in 4x or 5x.  I view these differently.  These are, to me, alternatives to LPVOs and spiritual successors of old general purpose 4x and 6x fixed power scopes, except more compact and with wider FOV.  There a couple of good options and, unsurprisingly, my favourites are Element Immersive 5x30  and the discontinued Elcan Spectre OS 4x.  The dual power Spectre DR is still thriving, as expensive as it is.    I have the single magnification 4x and it is a very good yardstick for what a high end prismatic should be.  With the Element, I am clearly biased since I designed the reticle for it.  In other words, I got to put a reticle I could not get other people to make into a scope I like.  You should not be terribly surprised to see it here.

 

LPVO

This one gets tough and there will be several options here.  Keep in mind that I like FFP LPVOs once we get up in price.  One of the reasons it gets tough is that as I keep putting together ARs for various family members, different LPVOs I have tend to migrate elsewhere.

With budget LPVOs, for now, I think Primary Arms SLx 1-6x24 with Nova reticle is the one to beat, but I no longer hae one here.  I should probably get another one and keep it here for comparison purposes.

On the mid-range, it is a battle between SAI6 1-6x24 with mrad reticle and the new PA PLxC 1-8x24 with day bright reticle illumination.  With PA, the reticle got a bit better sicne they went to diffractive illumination, but I would prefer a short mil tree of some sort.  It is light and short with an excellent eyepiece.  With SAI6, I like the whole reticle line-up but lean toward the mrad designs for general purpose use.  The X-Wing style high visbility feature is not for everyone, but it works for me.  I suppose I will keep both here.  

If you go up in price, my basic opinion has not changed.  Vortex Razor Gen3 1-10x24 is the one to beat if you want a nuclear bright reticle.  However, the notably less expensive PA PLxC with RDB reticle is absolutely giving it a run for its money.  The mrad reticle in the Vortex is more my cup of tea, though.

This leaves a little of a "no-man's land" with LPVOs that are designed to be true general purpose designs, like the side focus equipped March Shorty 1-10x24 and Delta Stryker 1-10x28.  They are a little too different to serve as a useful yardstick for anything but each other.  I ended up keeping the Delta.  Side focus really helps behind clip-ons.

 

Dangerous Game

I may have to skip one because I do not really have anything on hand right now (rifle-wise) that fits the description.  If I were to buy one, let's say a traditional 375H&H or 416Rigby, it would get Primary Arms' PLxC 1-8x24 SFP with fiber reticle.  In case it has not come through too well, I really like the PLxC line-up.

 

MPVO

For the time being, the one to rule them all is the dual focal plane March 1.5-15x42 https://bit.ly/4bjm15X  This category, almost by definition, is the one where compromises are made for the most flexibility.  This March is not perfect, but it is the best we currently have.  On the budget end, the yardstick should be Athlon's excellent Helos BTR Gen2 2-12x42, but it is sitting on top of a friend of mine's rifle two states to the West.  It can't be a reference standard if it is not here.  In the meantime, the old reliable SWFA SS 3-9x42 will do.  I have a couple of them.  https://swfa.com/swfa-3-9x42-ss-hd-mil-quad-reticle-30mm-tube-1-mil-clicks-ffp/

There is a big gap between a $600 SWFA and a $3100 March.  In the mid-range, Steiner H6Xi 2-12x42 with STR-Mil reticle is easily my favourite.  If I were going to have only one MPVO and I was payign for it out of my own pocket, Steiner would probably be it, so it is staying here.

 

Tweener

I do not like to use a discontinued scope as a yardstick, but Razor HD LH 1.5-8x32 has got to be it.  It is not a common scope category, so we will hoble along like this until I come up with something still manufactured (that fits the profile and I like).  On the low-ish end of the price range,  I do like SWFA 2.5-10x32 Ultralight and have a couple of them.  https://swfa.com/swfa-2-5-10x32-ss-ultralight-msr-556-bdc-reticle-1-tube-25-moa-clicks/ 

GPO makes a 1.5-9x32, but I do not have one.

 

Crossover

For once, this one is easy and I'll keep it all within a sane-ish price range.  Vortex Razor HD-LHT 4.5-22x50 and Delta Stryker 3.5-21x44 https://annexdefense.com/delta-stryker-hd-3-5-21x44-rifle-scope/ are the purest expressions of the crossover idea I have seen to date, this side of Tangent TT315M that you will see a couple of categories down.

 

Traditional Hunting

This get difficult again because it is not a type of a scope that is common around these parts and the ones I look at do not stick around too long.  I simply happen to be an FFP guy.  However, some hunting scope articles are very much overdue and I do have an excellent Delta Titanium 1.5-9x45.  In sticking with sane prices, let's add Tract Toric 2.5-15x44 with illuminated reticle to this list. 

These two should give me a decent ability to compare.  On the high end, there is the rather remarkable Tangent Theta Long Range Hunter that is the one to beat which is why it is not going anywhere.

 

General Purpose Practical Precision

Given how much this crosses over with, pun intended, crossover designs above, I could have merged them into signle category.  It would make too much sense so here we are.  Tangent Theta TT315M 3-15x50 is still it to me.  It does have limited elevation travel, so you have to be somewhat careful with how you mount it (in extreme cases, Burris XTR Signature rings where you can use their inserts to adjust slope may be needed).   Still, I have found nothing better yet.

If you want something more reasonably priced, I am going to go with the Telson Toxin 3-18x50 which repalces the very nice Burris XTR3i 3.3-18x50.  Both are very solid scopes, but Telson reticle has better visibility and it controls flare a little better.

 

Long Range Practical Precision

I might catch a lot of flack for this one, but so be it.  

High end: There are several spectacularly capable options, but there is a reason I shoot with the different Tangent Thetas, 5-25x56 and 7-35x56

Best bang for the buck on the high end: Vortex Razor Gen3 6-36x56 https://alnk.to/74xn2BV

Mid-range: Delta Stryker 4.5-30x56 (there is a bunch of simlar scopes in this category and I happen to have this one) and Burris XTR PS 5.5-30x56.  I think the heads up display in the XTR PS is a meangful innovation and is the way of the future.

Budget long range: Meopta Optika6 5-30x56 is a pretty decent scope and the one I have(again, there are several to choose from that are similar, but this one is on hand).  Unfortunately it is discontinued.

DNT The One 7-35x56 is easily one of the better budget options and it is here for now.  I am not sure if I will use the DNT as the reference standard since I have a couple of other heading this way that might occupy this role.  I'll know soon.

 

Short Range Target:

I'll have to skip this one for now since I do not do anything along these lines.  The closest I get is my rimfire trainer and I use Vortex Razor Gen3 on that rifle with good success.

 

Long Range Target:

Ditto.  It is not a category I look at much, so I do not have anything on hand that will fit.  I will rectify that.  Until then, the best paper shooting scope I have and intend to keep is March 5-42x56.  It bridges several categories nicely since it is FFP, but it pulls target shooting duty for me.  If I decide to do a comparison review on target scopes, this March will serve as the reference standard.  https://bit.ly/3TdABox

Field Target:

I do not have a Field Target setup, so this category is going to be skipped for now.  Hopefuly, not for too long.  If I were to start shooting Field Target, I'd be using the 5-42x56 March mentioned above.

Read full Article
post photo preview
Black Rifle Match at Del Norte
Slow. Just Slow.

There is a saying out there that "slow is smooth and smooth is fast".  Watching good shooters do this, I agree.

In my personal practice, I think I've mastered the slow part.  Now, I need to work on smooth and not worry about fast.

This was a one gun match.  Everyone I saw was using ARs, though it could be done just as easily with an AK.

The stages were all inspired by John Wick movies:

  1. High Table Highway
  2. The Catacombs
  3. Under The Table
  4. Nowhere to Run
  5. No Blood On Continental Grounds
  6. Dammit Perkins: Hallway Edition
  7. Continental Rooftop
  8. Guns, Lots of Guns
  9. Yeah, I thnking I'm zeroed

I took videos of all the stages, but Stage 3 for some reason:

For stage 4, I asked someone to take a video of me going through the stage.

Since I've never done a match like this, I elected to not push the pace and just try to hit everything on my own time.  It was quite a bit of fun, I must admit, and I will try to shoot more of these if they are local.  Having now done this once, I think I can comfortably go about 20% faster without losing accuracy.

Most of the shooting was pretty close, so it did not requie any precision.  A couple of stages did involve plates somewhere between 80 and 175 yards.  I did not expect that, so the gun I used was zeroed with Mk262 ammo, while I was shooting 55gr XM193.  I prefer to not mess with the zero of this gun too much, so next time I will load 3 30round mags with 77gr ammo to use on the stages where that is required.  Still, it did not slow me down too much.  It took two shots to figure out where 55s were shooting and then I was good.

As is usually the case, the difficult part in a match like this comes down to speed and efficiency, not ultimate accuracy.

They have several divisions and I chose to shoot in the Tactical Optics one.  That basically means you get to have one sighting system only, either an LPVO or prismatic or red dot with magnifier (single red dot is a different division).  You are allowed magazines of no more than 30 rounds and you can not use any shooting support supplements (no bags, bipods, etc).  You can have a sling, but on most stages it gets in the way.  We only needed one for Stage 4 since it started with breeching a door with a provided shotgun.

The gun I used is the recently build AR-15 where I used Q's 1-5" 5.56 barrel that is 9.68" long.  The handguard is Q's 9" OTP.  The suppressor is also from Q: The Southpaw.  The gun was not really broken in, but it is all broken in now.  I saw several guns go down during the match due to dirt and/or mechanical issues (broken charging handle, for example), but I had zero reliability issues with mine.  Most people were shooting unsupressed, but I would not change anything.  

The optic I used was Primary Arms' new PLxC 1-8x24 RDB and it was absolutely excellent.  It was rainy in the morning and overcast the rest of the day.

On 1x with that nuclear bright dot, it was stupid fast on target.  However, for more distant targets it was nice to dial in to 3x or so.

Interestingly, I had to dial down the dot brightness as the match proceeded since it was a little too bright.  On some of the more distant targets, the brightness got in the way a little.  I shot one stage on 1x with the illumination turned off.  I am not convinced it slowed me down much, but that could be due to me being new at this.  Still, I was able to figure out the aiming point without any issues.

My original plan was to eventually transition this gun to an Elcan 4x with a piggybacked red dot, but now I am having some reservations about it.  Both the PLxC and the Elcan use BDC reticles that do not work great with the reduced velocities out of a sub-10" barrel, but I can adapt them in a pinch, I suppose.

Given how light and compact the PLxC is, now that it has a diffractively illuminated reticle, it may very well be the best bang for the buck in the high end LPVO world.  It still uses the center chevron that many do not like, but it seems to work fine for my purposes.  The reticle is better (simpler) than on the previous FFP PLxC. It is somewhat similar to the original Meters PLxC reticle that is pretty good.

The eyepiece design on PLxC scopes is just spectacular.  The eyepiece bezel around the image is barely visible at all and the scope is exceedingly easy to use.

Overall, this gun the way it is set up now, is rapidly becoming my favourite general purpose AR variant I own.  I'll do a separate video on it at some point.

I did inadvertently learn what happens if you throw a gun with a blazing hot suppressor into a soft case.

We had to case the guns when walking from stage to stage.  I think I need a new case...

Funny thing is that I have a suppressor cover for the Southpaw, but for some reason I do not recall now I pulled it off.  It is gong back on.

The Q-cert OTP hanguard is just the right diameter for my hand and I appreciate the front grip that comes with it.  With a short-ish 9" handguard, I can't C-clamp it with a nearly straight arm, so hook the bottom three fingers of my support hand on the front grip with the index finger pointing forward and the thumb on top of the handguard.  The elbow is somewhat bent, but it is very easy to drive the gun that way and pull it a little bit back into my shoulder for a consistent hold during transitions.

Since I was worried about the 180 rule and concerned about my inexperience with running around with a gun, I did not try to push the pace at all and, in retrospect, that was the right move.  I was not rushed at any point.  I did not time out at any point.  I did not have any accuracy issues.  I did lose focus on one of the stages and forgot about three of the targets.  I was more or less on point the rest of it.

This particular match happens twice a year at the Del Norte shooting range, so I will make sure they are on my calendar.  While my primary interest with shooting sports is still with NRL Hutner and PRS stages, the faster tactical mataches are a nice diversion and offer a possibility of dragging my brother into it.  I do not know if he has the patience for precision rifle, but he would definitely enjoy this match.  I'll see if I can drag him into shooting the next one with me.

Another interesting thing is that one of the gentlemen in my squad turned out to be Parker Tomasi, the owner of Legacy Ranch.  Legacy Ranch is a new-ish private shooting facility about 45 minute drive from my house.  They are constantly expanding and, apparently, are planning to add a 1000 yard range to what they offer (currently, 450 yards is the max they have).  Parker, aside from being an exceptionally capable shot, seemed like a stand up gentleman.  I am going to go visit Legacy Ranch and see if I want to become a member.

Legacy Ranch could also be an interesting venue if I ever were to organize a shooting class or a match as a get together for those willing to travel.  They do have classrooms available.  Two of the owners are Scout snipers and they do not have any issues with guest instructors, so I can potentially invite someone like Phil Velayo or Tony Cowden or Frank Galli to come teach a class for us (assuming there is interest).

 

 

Read full Article
Available on mobile and TV devices
google store google store app store app store
google store google store app tv store app tv store amazon store amazon store roku store roku store
Powered by Locals