Back-up optics and Primary Arms
PA is sort of an interesting company and their ACSS reticle family has a really rabid following. I have to fully admit that I am not really onboard with some of those reticle designs, but they are always well thought out. I just do not always agree with how they frame the problem they are looking to solve.
That having been said, I have been looking at three of their prismatic scopes: SLx Micro 1x and 3x (3x is not officially out yet) and GLx 2x. All three are going onto my list of recommendations. I think PA did a very good job for the money with those. I have talked about the GLx 2x in the past. SLx Micro 1x video is in the works and will be out soon. Micro 3x review will be out a little later once they actually release the product.
Prismatic scopes are not the "be all do all" some people make them out to be, but they do work well and do a lot of things well while maintaining a compact overall package.
Another PA-ish product that I have not issued a full review on, but it is going onto my list of recommendations is the Holosun 507C with ACSS Vulcan reticle.
Why do I bring them up now? Well, I have been thinking about picking up a couple more of these for different guns, so they are among the products I monitor as we get to Black Friday. These are not so expensive that I have to think long and hard about buying one if I see a good deal pop-up.
More importantly, I have this paranoid streak in me that makes me have back up optics and spares. For many rifles that I have, I keep some pre-sighted in optics as a spare or backup and I want these to be robust, light weight and reasonably inexpensive. I am not going to have an extra $2k Razor Gen3 laying around as a spare. With conventional scopes, that always brings me back to the sub-10 ounce SWFA 2.5-10x32 Ultralight.
With fixed power designs for ARs and AKs, I am sorta converging on PA's micro prisms and Holosun's solar powered 507C with Vulcan reticle for the same purpose.
Here are the specific ones on my shopping list and if I run into any additional discounts on these, I'll edit this post.
SLx Micro 1x: https://bit.ly/3HR2YRM
GLx 2x w/300BO or 7.62x39 reticle: https://bit.ly/3kCiJR8
GLx 2x with 5.56 reticle: https://bit.ly/3FKijRV
Holosun 507C Vulcan: https://bit.ly/3cGA48A
To address the invariable question that comes up whenever I say something nice about a PA optics: "they are all amazing-est, best-est, most remarkable-est, etc. Why aren't you listing them all in every post?"
For several reasons. The most obvious one is that I have not tested them all and I absolutely refuse to recommend anything I have not tested. Another reason is that for many of their other products, there is a lot of competition and often times, in those categories, I prefer the competition.
A good example of that is the PLx 1-8x24 that gets brought up quite a bit. It is a really nice robust design and Griffin Mil reticle works really well in it. However, at 27 ounces, it is heavier than I want in an LPVO. This is the version I am referring to: https://bit.ly/3DMhyaC
There is nothing wrong with it overall, but given the balance of features, for the same money and application there are other designs I prefer.
Or, let's take the GLx 2.5-10x44 that I happen to really like (I have the Griffin Mil version: https://bit.ly/3xu8EMN and for $650 it really kicks ass, but the reticle is really designed for LPVOs, not scopes with excellent exposed turrets). That will likely end up on my list of recommendations, but someone mentioned that they have an updated version of Griffin Mil coming that will work better with this scope. I want to see what that looks like before endorsing it.
I really do consider the specifics very carefully before I recommend something.
That is one of the things that annoys me about many gun bloggers: they throw links around just to get you to buy something. Anything at all, so that they can make an affiliate commission. That is really not the way I approach this. I am sure optics manufacturers hate when I do that, but I am not really here for them.